Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Fuhrmeister: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Glenfarclas (talk | contribs) →Chris Fuhrmeister: delete |
→Chris Fuhrmeister: delete |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Speedy Delete''' unreferenced, non-notable (Google just returns facebook etc.) Looks like a student making his own vanity page. Should probably have been tagged as a speedy. [[User:Maccy69|Maccy69]] ([[User talk:Maccy69|talk]]) 05:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Speedy Delete''' unreferenced, non-notable (Google just returns facebook etc.) Looks like a student making his own vanity page. Should probably have been tagged as a speedy. [[User:Maccy69|Maccy69]] ([[User talk:Maccy69|talk]]) 05:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''', non-notable. In my view, completely unsourced, unelaborated claims that a subject is "famous" shouldn't defeat speedy, but others' mileage may vary. [[User:Glenfarclas|<span style="background:#003F87;color:#EDEDED" vlink="color:#EDEDED">''' '''Glenfarclas''' </span>]]''' ([[User talk:Glenfarclas|<span style="color:#003F87">talk</span>]]) 06:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', non-notable. In my view, completely unsourced, unelaborated claims that a subject is "famous" shouldn't defeat speedy, but others' mileage may vary. [[User:Glenfarclas|<span style="background:#003F87;color:#EDEDED" vlink="color:#EDEDED">''' '''Glenfarclas''' </span>]]''' ([[User talk:Glenfarclas|<span style="color:#003F87">talk</span>]]) 06:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Speedy delete''' Article makes a vague assertion of "talent," but no assertion of notability. [[WP:BOLD|Being bold]], I have nominated it for [[WP:A7|A7]]. --[[User:SquidSK|SquidSK]] [[User_talk:SquidSK|<sup>(1MC</sup>]]<sup>•</sup>[[Special:Contributions/SquidSK|<sup>log)</sup>]] 06:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:49, 31 December 2009
Chris Fuhrmeister
- Chris Fuhrmeister (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced WP:BLP that has either no mention of, or weak mention of, notability. Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as nonnotable. I live in Bloomington, and know a lot of musicians here, and I have never heard of this guy. I doubt he's even notable enough to be listed in Bloomingpedia. Why is this not speedied as db-bio? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 05:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't speedy it because it seemed to make a claim of notability with "one of the most talented music producers to attend Indiana University." It's not verifiable, but it is a claim, and that's all WP:CSD#A7 requires. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Would a prod have been appropriate then? It seems pretty open and shut as it stands. Maccy69 (talk) 05:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but that's mostly irrelevant now. The end result is the same.... --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Would a prod have been appropriate then? It seems pretty open and shut as it stands. Maccy69 (talk) 05:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't speedy it because it seemed to make a claim of notability with "one of the most talented music producers to attend Indiana University." It's not verifiable, but it is a claim, and that's all WP:CSD#A7 requires. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete unreferenced, non-notable (Google just returns facebook etc.) Looks like a student making his own vanity page. Should probably have been tagged as a speedy. Maccy69 (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. In my view, completely unsourced, unelaborated claims that a subject is "famous" shouldn't defeat speedy, but others' mileage may vary. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Article makes a vague assertion of "talent," but no assertion of notability. Being bold, I have nominated it for A7. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 06:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)