Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community College Futures Assembly
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
Print/export
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs) at 06:34, 2 August 2010 (→[[Community College Futures Assembly]]: link and template updates; editing per policy; see talk page using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:34, 2 August 2010 by AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs) (→[[Community College Futures Assembly]]: link and template updates; editing per policy; see talk page using AWB)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Community College Futures Assembly
- Community College Futures Assembly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedied once as advertorial and recreated. Two references, both passing mentions. One of them is just a namecheck. Guy (Help!) 19:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - advertising for non-notable entity. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree with Orangemike. I've speedied this mess once already. TNXMan 19:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article seems to have been much expanded, with several dozen references. Many are to papers given at the conference and published in what seems to be a major journal in the field, which are only indirectly relevant, but all in all, I think it's enough for an article. DGG ( talk ) 00:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The dozen references don't seem to demonstrate notability. A huge number of them are from one source: "Community College Journal of Research and Practice". Shadowjams (talk) 09:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unnotable entity, fails WP:ORG and WP:N; references assed are all from a single non-thirdparty source -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 22:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.