Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvest Tradings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Azamishaque (talk | contribs) at 19:18, 13 September 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Harvest Tradings

Harvest Tradings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There may be some sources in Pakistani, but the english sources I can find all appear to be press releases that are mirrored on other sites. This article has been subject to serious socking/tag-team editing. Though they appear to be hoping to become a major export company, at this time they do not appear to be one. Closing admin should examine editing patterns of users who comment on this discussion for blatant socking. Terrillja talk 20:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I can find no indepedent sources that indicate that this company might be notable - I note that two previous attempts to create an article on this subject were speedy deleted, once as an A7 and once as a G11. I don't speak Urdu, so I am open to persuasion if someone can find some appropriate sources. Rje (talk) 23:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As per comments, promotional issues. Lack of independent citations and reports. Off2riorob (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: sources in their entirety consist of press releases, blogs, and the company's official website; there's no indication of notability and clearly a search for third-party sources is coming up empty. The promotional nature of the bulk of the article is also cause for concern, but not a reason for deletion: promotional material should be removed and improved rather than the article deleted, unless it meets G11, which I don't believe it does. However, the article can and should be deleted on the notability issues and lack of verifiability alone. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 09:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do not Delete I don't think so that it may be deleted because, as i have seen the only single private owned organization in the South Asia who contribut to nation and working on the different authentic patrens. so rather to delete its better to improveHorticultures (talk) 11:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I agree with Horticultures (talk) point of view, it must not be deleted, and try to improve the article and deleted those things which we may feel appropriate. Azamishaque (talk) 12:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]