Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of companies of Georgia (Country)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.117.1.254 (talk) at 14:46, 30 July 2009 (→‎List of companies of Georgia (Country)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

List of companies of Georgia (Country)

List of companies of Georgia (Country) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Too broad in scope of a list topic to provide much value. inappropriate list RadioFan (talk) 22:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note also this draft at the Wikiproject Companies Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Lists of companies by country 76.117.1.254 (talk) 03:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:SALAT. The topic of this list is too great to have an encyclopedic article written about it. When (theoretically) complete, this list would be immense and the comparison of one company to another would have little to no encyclopedic benefit. This is appropriate for a category, but not a list. ThemFromSpace 02:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's why this list should be split into categories (i.e. financial institutions, transport etc), so that if the list grows too large the categories can be moved out to a new page. That is actually what WP:SALAT says. Apart from that, how many notable companies do you think there are in Georgia? I mean, its not like the Georgian economy is particularly large. 76.117.1.254 (talk) 04:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Whether a small country or not, is is simply too braod a topic for a list.YobMod 11:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again, that is not a valid argument as per WP:Salat the list can easily be broken down into smaller lists (according to the categories) once it grows too large. Not that this will happen anytime soon, if ever, because there are just not many notable companies in Georgia. 76.117.1.254 (talk) 14:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]