Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan audio leaks controversy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:51, 22 April 2024

Pakistan audio leaks controversy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:SINGLEEVENT. This fails WP:GNG. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 13:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 13:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Politics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This isn't about a single event, and coverage has been ongoing for months and months at this point (see here, here, and here). The article needs an update, but as usual, AfD isn't clean-up. Cortador (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But this article discusses audio leaks involving Pakistan's prime ministers, but the sources you provided doesn't pertain to prime ministers. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While the topic has indeed received extended coverage over a significant period, the accumulation of sources does not inherently justify the retention of an article. The core issue pertains to notability and whether the subject matter has sustained coverage that adds substantial information. The main concern is the notability and consistent, in-depth coverage. The provided references don’t seem to enhance the topic’s comprehension. While it’s true that the AfD isn’t just for clean-up, it does allow for evaluating an article’s significance. In this instance, the article seems to fall short of the expected encyclopedic depth and quality. samee converse 02:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 '''Keep'''. This isn't about a single event, and coverage has been ongoing for months and months at this point (see [https://pakobserver.net/cracks-develop-in-pti-as-fresh-audio-leaks-suggest-clash-between-bushra-bibi-and-imran-khans-sisters/ here], [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/pakistans-intelligence-agency-blames-ordinary-hackers-for-audio-leaks-of-politicians/articleshow/106308898.cms here], and [https://www.dawn.com/news/1817940 here]). The article needs an update, but as usual, AfD isn't clean-up. [[User:Cortador|Cortador]] ([[User talk:Cortador|talk]]) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 :But this article discusses audio leaks involving Pakistan's prime ministers, but the sources you provided doesn't pertain to prime ministers. --—[[User:Saqib|<span style="color:#005080">Saqib</span>]] ([[User talk:Saqib|<span style="color:#700090">talk</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Saqib|<span style="color:#996600">contribs</span>]]) 15:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
+'''Delete''' While the topic has indeed received extended coverage over a significant period, the accumulation of sources does not inherently justify the retention of an article. The core issue pertains to notability and whether the subject matter has sustained coverage that adds substantial information. The main concern is the notability and consistent, in-depth coverage. The provided references don’t seem to enhance the topic’s comprehension. While it’s true that the AfD isn’t just for clean-up, it does allow for evaluating an article’s significance. In this instance, the article seems to fall short of the expected encyclopedic depth and quality. <span style="border:1px solid #7f0063;padding:1px;"> [[User:Samee|<span style="color:#fff;background:#911175;">&nbsp;'''samee'''&nbsp;</span>]][[User talk:Samee|<span style="color:#fff;background:#a85796;">&nbsp;''converse''&nbsp;</span>]]</span> 02:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)