Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan audio leaks controversy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:20, 24 April 2024

Pakistan audio leaks controversy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:SINGLEEVENT. This fails WP:GNG. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 13:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 13:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Politics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This isn't about a single event, and coverage has been ongoing for months and months at this point (see here, here, and here). The article needs an update, but as usual, AfD isn't clean-up. Cortador (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But this article discusses audio leaks involving Pakistan's prime ministers, but the sources you provided doesn't pertain to prime ministers. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article starts with the sentence "The Pakistan audio leaks controversy stems from several leaked audio conversations involving Pakistan's prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and former prime minister Imran Khan among others." Emphasis mine. The second article talks about "the recent audio leaks involving politicians, judges, and their relatives", confirming that sources treat the audio leaks controversy as one event, whether or not a given leak featuring a (former) prime minister or not. Cortador (talk) 06:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While the topic has indeed received extended coverage over a significant period, the accumulation of sources does not inherently justify the retention of an article. The core issue pertains to notability and whether the subject matter has sustained coverage that adds substantial information. The main concern is the notability and consistent, in-depth coverage. The provided references don’t seem to enhance the topic’s comprehension. While it’s true that the AfD isn’t just for clean-up, it does allow for evaluating an article’s significance. In this instance, the article seems to fall short of the expected encyclopedic depth and quality. samee converse 02:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:Notability. Also lack of depth. Wikibear47 (talk) 00:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would like to point out that WP:SINGLEEVENT (cited in the nomination) explicitly doesn't apply here as that is for articles about people, not articles about events. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:10, 23 April 2024 edit Wikibear47 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,323 edits →‎Pakistan audio leaks controversy ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:20, 24 April 2024 edit undo Elli (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 52,853 edits comment Next edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:Notability]]. Also lack of depth. [[User:Wikibear47\|Wikibear47]] ([[User talk:Wikibear47\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)		'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:Notability]]. Also lack of depth. [[User:Wikibear47\|Wikibear47]] ([[User talk:Wikibear47\|talk]]) 00:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
			*Would like to point out that [[WP:SINGLEEVENT]] (cited in the nomination) explicitly doesn't apply here as that is for articles about people, not articles about events. [[User:Elli\|Elli]] ([[User_talk:Elli\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Elli\|contribs]]) 17:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)