Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2021 January 24: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Auth0: allow recreation as draft
Jclayc (talk | contribs)
Line 19: Line 19:
*'''Endorse''' but that isn't the question. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 02:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
*'''Endorse''' but that isn't the question. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 02:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
*'''Allow Re-Creation''' only in draft, as is required for paid submissions. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 02:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
*'''Allow Re-Creation''' only in draft, as is required for paid submissions. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 02:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] Thank you for the feedback. I have [[Draft:Auth0|re-created the article in draft format]] and marked it for review via the articles for creation process.

Revision as of 15:03, 25 January 2021

24 January 2021

Auth0

Auth0 (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

Notice that this is a WP:PAID contribution. jclayc has been paid by ForwardPMX on behalf of Auth0. History of the deletion conversation is here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Auth0 Since the time of deletion, the company has met notability guidelines through reliable coverage by independent sources. See revised article in my sandbox. In addition to the content there, I believe the company is notable because of all of the derivative works that the open source community has built around their solution, a partial list of which is below, but I was unsure of the best way to include in the article revision.

Robert McClenon Thank you for the feedback. I have re-created the article in draft format and marked it for review via the articles for creation process.