Wikipedia:Editor review/Smsarmad

Smsarmad

Smsarmad (talk · contribs) Hello! I am Sarmad and I joined Wikipedia, April last year. At start i didn't find much time for editing here but i started editing at regular bases from December 2007. I also got blocked for a week(said to be for vandalizing). But I thought to continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia, so I continued more regularly after the block was over. I want my editing to be reviewed so to know that am i really contributing constructively or not? SMS ^Talk 16:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

You need to remember to discuss changes on the article talk page prior to making them and wait until you and the other editors of the article reach a decision. Only after consensus is reached should you make the change if appropriate, using an edit summary that explains the change being made. You also seem to get into a lot of conflicts with other editors, although I believe this has been improving recently. Just remember to be civil, consider other editors' points of view, and be willing to admit when you are wrong. Amillion (talk) 02:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing, although your review seems to be based on only my recent 50 or at most 100 edits according to me. --SMS ^Talk 19:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are one of the responsible editors on Wikipedia and your neutral Point of view is your key talent. Your work specially the recent one of improving articles written by other editors is remarkable. I appreciate your assistance and encouragement to other editors.--Shahenshahkillz (talk) 11:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using TParis's 'X!'s edit counter' Tool

Comments

Stop editing the Awan Wikipedia entry, you don't seem to understand that it is below your pay grade. 205.156.188.254 (talk)

Finally someone got time to write something about me! Well bro! please read the talk page of the article you are referring to for your answer, User:Green Giant has written comprehensive note regarding your concern. --SMS ^Talk 18:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do only comment as part of ACC team, but what I have seen there, you doing a great job there and helping with our backlog. Please don't stop. ;-) mabdul 10:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[1] does not give confidence into your editing habits. i feel that you certainly need to look at Wikipedia:Assume bad faith to improve. Using bias towards Indian editors and editing controversial India-Pakistan articles (eg: Siachen conflict ) without a wp:NPOV is another issue that you have been found lacking. Also please take special care while dealing with newbies as they are not aware of rules, and not Bite them -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 16:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: i Second you here! --VI-007 (talk) 13:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you are single, who is heavily biased towards India,Kashmir and Pakistan. By saying you are single i mean only a single person bites people like you do. --39.55.62.216 (talk) 07:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC) This user is a suspected sockpuppet of Viii007 (talk · contribs)[reply]

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
Well! I am pleased regarding my contributions to the articles Pakistan Air Force Academy and Frontier Force Regiment because I think these articles are much better now than they were before.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
Yes! i have been involved in many edit conflicts and many of these were resolved peacefully(Thanks GOD!). And I do have a strong feeling that an editor gave me too much tension. I tried to be civil each time and tried to end the conflict ASAP! sometime I also avoided some editor, by not replying to them! but they still followed me everywhere and tried to revert what i edited! but i followed the principle of forgive and forget each time, so don't think it to be a problem. May be my dealing to conflicts up till now wasn't appropriate! but in future i will always try to be CIVIL and assume good faith while dealing a dispute and will try to calm down other users by offering them tea.

Question asked by Manakattu (talk · contribs)

Did it ever occur to you that you are heavily biased towards a Pakistani POV and has infringed on the neutrality of wikipedia ?
Actually sometimes I find out that at some articles only one side's point of view is mentioned which is duly sourced. As I am a Pakistani, I have knowledge of most of the issues related to Pakistan, so to bring Neutrality to the article if I find duly sourced content that may state the other POV as already in the article, I will add it along with the pov already in the article, which some (or very few) editors, not adhering to neutral pov object and may say that I am heavily biased towards Pakistani POV.

Reviews This user is heavily biased towards Pakistan and changes neutral topics towards Pakistani POV.

Example: Osama bin Laden was sheltered in pakistan at a stone throwing distance from one of the countries military acedemy. This universally known truth appeared to be impartial to this guy. What a JOKE!!