Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Horses in World War I/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
previous peer review |
addition |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Comment''': Has the primary contributor, [[user:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]], been consulted about this nomination? I don't see that you have any history in editing the article, and FAC doesn't typically take kind to drive-by noms. <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[User talk:Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">habla</span>]] con[[Special:Contributions/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">migo</span>]])</small> 20:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''': Has the primary contributor, [[user:Dana boomer|Dana boomer]], been consulted about this nomination? I don't see that you have any history in editing the article, and FAC doesn't typically take kind to drive-by noms. <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[User talk:Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">habla</span>]] con[[Special:Contributions/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">migo</span>]])</small> 20:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
:*I was thinking the same thing. I know Dana has plans to bring this article here eventually, but think she will do so when she's ready. [[User:Bradjamesbrown|Bradjamesbrown]] ([[User talk:Bradjamesbrown|talk]]) 20:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
:*I was thinking the same thing. I know Dana has plans to bring this article here eventually, but think she will do so when she's ready. [[User:Bradjamesbrown|Bradjamesbrown]] ([[User talk:Bradjamesbrown|talk]]) 20:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
::*There was a previous Peer Review, and all the points have been met, the best I can tell. I will withdraw, if that's better. [[User:mynameinc|mynameinc]] ([[user talk:mynameinc|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Mynameinc|c]]) 20:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
::*There was a previous Peer Review, and all the points have been met, the best I can tell. I will withdraw, if that's better. Also, I thought the community would perceive 'drive-by noms' better, since it was by a third party who thinks it's ready, rather than a contributor. [[User:mynameinc|mynameinc]] ([[user talk:mynameinc|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Mynameinc|c]]) 20:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 20:52, 7 April 2010
Horses in World War I
Horses in World War I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured article candidates/Horses in World War I/archive1
- Featured article candidates/Horses in World War I/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that it addresses the subject completely and fully and meets the quality standards of a Featured Article. mynameinc (t|c) 19:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: Has the primary contributor, Dana boomer, been consulted about this nomination? I don't see that you have any history in editing the article, and FAC doesn't typically take kind to drive-by noms. María (habla conmigo) 20:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing. I know Dana has plans to bring this article here eventually, but think she will do so when she's ready. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- There was a previous Peer Review, and all the points have been met, the best I can tell. I will withdraw, if that's better. Also, I thought the community would perceive 'drive-by noms' better, since it was by a third party who thinks it's ready, rather than a contributor. mynameinc (t|c) 20:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)