Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:1 Wild Turkey.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 109.152.147.122 (talk) at 18:27, 27 March 2015 (→‎Wild Turkey). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wild Turkey

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2015 at 09:15:08 (UTC)

Original – Plate 1 of Birds of America by John James Audubon depicting a Wild Turkey, engraved from a painting Audubon made in 1825
Reason
Beautiful Audubon colour engraving of the world's most fabulous fowl. Oh, that haughty posture—makes me hungry!
Articles in which this image appears
John James Audubon, The Birds of America, Turkey (bird)
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator
John James Audubon
  • Support as nominatorCurly Turkey ¡gobble! 09:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gorgeous... but is it just me, or are the margins a bit tight? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • That was done purposely to provide maximal turkey. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 11:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Perhaps, but I doubt the original engraving had the lower land right up to the margins. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • In the top left-hand corner there is some text that looks like it should say "No 1", but most of the "N" is chopped off. 109.153.225.26 (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Print techniques can differ from edition to edition, depending on how they use the paper and the plate. However the rest is ‎ 7,787 × 11,601 pixels and magnifique. Hafspajen (talk) 15:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that what we see is the true left edge of the print. Possibly the print has been cut out of a book, and the "No. 1" text disappeared into the spine. The left-hand edge is odd. At first it looks ragged, and I thought it was the actual cut edge, but looking more closely it seems to have been cropped in a series of slightly stepped exact straight lines, as if done in multiple stages in an image editor for some reason. I'm not saying it's a big deal; it's just puzzling. 109.152.147.122 (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of 'tight'