Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Blackpink/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cambalachero (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* '''Keep''': This is talk page history and should never be deleted. [[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 13:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) <!--VCB SmokeyJoe--> |
* '''Keep''': This is talk page history and should never be deleted. [[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 13:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC) <!--VCB SmokeyJoe--> |
||
*'''Comment''' It would be relatively trivial to simply overwrite the existing content with a new review without needing to delete anything, and even if that is disfavored for some reason, there is no shortage of space and therefore no need to "make room" for anything as new pages may always be created. Looking at [[Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Talk:|the prefix index]] these are sometimes deleted and sometimes retained though judging from a cursory review many of the deletions were actually [[WP:G7]]s done after the MFD was started. [[Special:Contributions/2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B|2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B]] ([[User talk:2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B|talk]]) 13:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' It would be relatively trivial to simply overwrite the existing content with a new review without needing to delete anything, and even if that is disfavored for some reason, there is no shortage of space and therefore no need to "make room" for anything as new pages may always be created. Looking at [[Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Talk:|the prefix index]] these are sometimes deleted and sometimes retained though judging from a cursory review many of the deletions were actually [[WP:G7]]s done after the MFD was started. [[Special:Contributions/2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B|2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B]] ([[User talk:2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B|talk]]) 13:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''': Keep the first review archived, and write a new review at Talk:Blackpink/GA2. The first one was closed with a reason that is not valid, yes, but it's not vandalism either. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 16:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:17, 28 April 2024
Talk:Blackpink/GA1
Delete to make space for a proper GA review. It seems like one of the editors has blanked the page so it's most likely that they also want it to be deleted. Okmrman (talk) 05:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per rationale. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The Sydney Morning Herald 05:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- user:750h+, your signature is not ok. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: This is talk page history and should never be deleted. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It would be relatively trivial to simply overwrite the existing content with a new review without needing to delete anything, and even if that is disfavored for some reason, there is no shortage of space and therefore no need to "make room" for anything as new pages may always be created. Looking at the prefix index these are sometimes deleted and sometimes retained though judging from a cursory review many of the deletions were actually WP:G7s done after the MFD was started. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:49B:2883:34FC:225B (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Keep the first review archived, and write a new review at Talk:Blackpink/GA2. The first one was closed with a reason that is not valid, yes, but it's not vandalism either. Cambalachero (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)