Wikipedia:Paid editing policy proposal: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Public relations and marketing: 5 pillars go beyond editorial standards, so linking to Wikipedia:Core content policies to provide guidance specific to the topic of discussion
Copyright
Line 27: Line 27:


Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Outing|"outing" policy]] expressly prohibits the disclosure of personal information of any editor, including editors who have disclosed a financial interest related to their participation in Wikipedia, based on sources outside of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] principle requires the Wikipedia community to expect editors to comply with [[#Paid editing disclosure|the requirement to disclose a financial interest in editing Wikipedia]], and not to investigate editors for conflicts of interest based on personal information.
Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Outing|"outing" policy]] expressly prohibits the disclosure of personal information of any editor, including editors who have disclosed a financial interest related to their participation in Wikipedia, based on sources outside of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] principle requires the Wikipedia community to expect editors to comply with [[#Paid editing disclosure|the requirement to disclose a financial interest in editing Wikipedia]], and not to investigate editors for conflicts of interest based on personal information.

== Copyright==

Due to Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]], editors may not take drafts from other people and merely post them. This would be a copyright violation. All contributions must be made by the author using their own account. [[Wikipedia:Role accounts|Shared accounts]] are forbidden.


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 13:53, 20 October 2013

Paid Editing Proposals
In November 2013, there were three main discussions and votes
on paid editing:

No paid advocacy (talk) (closed: opposed)
Paid editing policy proposal (talk) (closed: opposed)
Conflict of interest limit (talk) (closed: opposed)

Paid editing is the practice of accepting money to edit Wikipedia. Editors who intend to participate in paid editing are required to edit transparently and neutrally, and prohibited from introducing bias into Wikipedia's coverage or violating our core content policies – just like any other editors. To ensure the neutrality of paid editors, they must disclose that they are being compensated for their contributions.

Paid advocacy is being paid to promote or advocate against something or someone on Wikipedia, and is a subset of paid editing. All advocacy, paid or unpaid, is prohibited on Wikipedia.

Accepting money or rewards for editing Wikipedia is not inherently problematic. For example, it would be acceptable if a university asked one of its professors to write up its warts-and-all history for a Wikipedia article. The Wikipedia reward board – a place where editors can post incentives, financial or otherwise – is another benign example. In these examples, the paid editing is transparent and usually intended to improve the quality of articles, not to slant the articles toward a particular point of view.

Public relations and marketing

If you:

  • Are receiving benefits or considerations from the subject of an article, and you are a representative, contractor, or employee of the subject; or
  • Expect to get benefits or considerations from editing Wikipedia (for example, by being an owner, officer, or other stakeholder of an organization who would benefit; or having some form of close financial relationship with a topic),

then you must disclose your financial interest on your user page before editing Wikipedia pages where these external relationships could undermine your ability to edit neutrally. You must explicitly reiterate this disclosure in your first comment in any discussion related to the subject with which you have a financial interest. By making this disclosure, you help other editors to scrutinize your work for potential bias.

If you get into a dispute with other editors, you should seek advice from uninvolved editors (for example, on the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard). You may have to recuse yourself from further editing of the topics in question. You must exercise care not to become a tendentious editor, or else you could be blocked.

If your changes to an article could lead to controversy due to your financial interests, you should use the article's talk page to suggest changes, or the {{request edit}} template to request edits, instead of editing. You won't be ignored. Requested edits are subject to the same editorial standards as any other, and may be accepted or rejected.

Content intended to advertise, promote, or advocate a specific subject or viewpoint is strictly prohibited. Wikipedia is not a means of promoting or advertising something.

No investigation outside of Wikipedia

Wikipedia's "outing" policy expressly prohibits the disclosure of personal information of any editor, including editors who have disclosed a financial interest related to their participation in Wikipedia, based on sources outside of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's assume good faith principle requires the Wikipedia community to expect editors to comply with the requirement to disclose a financial interest in editing Wikipedia, and not to investigate editors for conflicts of interest based on personal information.

Copyright

Due to Wikipedia's copyright policy, editors may not take drafts from other people and merely post them. This would be a copyright violation. All contributions must be made by the author using their own account. Shared accounts are forbidden.

See also