Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/64.114 etc: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Suspected sockpuppets: remove master from suspect list |
Jack Frost (talk | contribs) Comment, marking case as closed (using spihelper.js) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===26 August 2023=== |
===26 August 2023=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1=64.114.239.31|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
{{sock list|1=64.114.239.31|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*Oh right. I was too fast with this case (twice). I just assumed block evasion, but the IP block being from October 2022, this is pretty much irrelevant. Closing. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 14:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC) |
*Oh right. I was too fast with this case (twice). I just assumed block evasion, but the IP block being from October 2022, this is pretty much irrelevant. Closing. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 14:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
*I initially closed this, see an extended rationale here: {{diff2|1172379133}}. However, after seeting {{checkuser|162 etc.}}, which seems to be related, I'm reopening for further consideration. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 07:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC) |
*I initially closed this, see an extended rationale here: {{diff2|1172379133}}. However, after seeting {{checkuser|162 etc.}}, which seems to be related, I'm reopening for further consideration. [[User:MarioGom|MarioGom]] ([[User talk:MarioGom|talk]]) 07:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
*Limited amount of crossover. Username similarity seems understandable. Doesn't appear actionable. Closing. --[[User:Jack Frost|Jack Frost]] ([[User talk:Jack Frost|talk]]) 22:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 22:28, 29 August 2023
64.114 etc
- 64.114 etc (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/64.114 etc/Archive.
26 August 2023
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
Block evasion. Read the User Page which introduces themselves as "Formerly known as 64.114.239.31", which has yet to serve its block duration. Graywalls (talk) 07:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Awaiting administrative action - Flagging admins to consider if a block of the new IP is required. I suggest CSD'ing this with G6 after that, whatever the decision about the block is. MarioGom (talk) 09:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)- Oops. I misread the report. Do not G6'd since it's actually a registered account. I will move the case. MarioGom (talk) 09:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. The userpage comment is certainly suspect, but it's literally the only thing here - is there a pattern of similar edits, or at least problematic edits? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oh right. I was too fast with this case (twice). I just assumed block evasion, but the IP block being from October 2022, this is pretty much irrelevant. Closing. MarioGom (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- I initially closed this, see an extended rationale here: [1]. However, after seeting 162 etc. (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), which seems to be related, I'm reopening for further consideration. MarioGom (talk) 07:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Limited amount of crossover. Username similarity seems understandable. Doesn't appear actionable. Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 22:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
