Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DMB112: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above t...'
 
DMB112 (talk | contribs)
Line 19: Line 19:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>


It is mine. Had I wanted to hide, I wouldn't have left my signature. My bad. [[User:DMB112|DMB112]] ([[User talk:DMB112|talk]]) 21:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 21:05, 1 January 2014

DMB112

DMB112 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DMB112/Archive.
01 January 2014

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


User:DMB112 was blocked for 2 weeks beginning December 16 for edit warring. RedPill1785 was created on December 21 and edited a variety of academic-related articles, an area on which DMB112 also concentrates. Today RedPill1785 made an edit to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football, here. A few moments later, DMB112 - whose block expired on December 30 - edited RedPill1875's comment to substitute his own signature, here. I am not requesting a CU as I think there is no other explanation for this sequence of events than puppetry and block evasion. JohnInDC (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

It is mine. Had I wanted to hide, I wouldn't have left my signature. My bad. DMB112 (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments