Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law: Difference between revisions
Undid revision 316071164 by 75.154.186.241 (talk) I prefer it the way it was |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{essay|WP:HAMMER|WP:CRYSTALHAMMER|WP:HAMMERTIME}} |
{{essay|WP:HAMMER|WP:CRYSTALHAMMER|WP:HAMMERTIME}} |
||
{{nutshell|If you don't even know the name of an upcoming album, you probably don't know enough about it to write an article.}} |
{{nutshell|If you don't even know the name of an upcoming album, you probably don't know enough about it to write an article.}} |
||
[[File:Thor.jpg|thumb|right|If you do not want to feel the holy wrath of the thunder god, then do not title the article "[name of artist]'s [nth] studio album".]] |
|||
'''[[User:TenPoundHammer|TenPoundHammer]]'s Law''': If the name and track order of a future album are not yet known, the album is very likely to see its page [[WP:AFD|deleted]] from Wikipedia. Pages of this sort usually take the naming convention "[name of artist]'s [nth] studio album". There are occasional exceptions to this law, as sometimes a future album ''will'' contain enough verifiable information for a decent article even if the title is not known.<ref>For example, ''[[In Rainbows]]'' had a fully fledged article before its name was announced, because the page already contained sufficient sourced information for an article.</ref> But if all you can do is [[WP:CRYSTAL|look into a crystal ball]] or base your information off rumors posted to message boards, blogs or MySpace, then it's best ''not'' to create a page on the album until you've got something more to say. Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:There is no deadline|isn't going anywhere]]; it's not going to hurt you to wait.<ref>Also consider the fact that arguments like "''everybody'' knows it will be put out soon" or "this is going to be [name of artist]'s biggest album", or worst of all, "you just hate [name of artist], don't you?" don't hold water.</ref> |
'''[[User:TenPoundHammer|TenPoundHammer]]'s Law''': If the name and track order of a future album are not yet known, the album is very likely to see its page [[WP:AFD|deleted]] from Wikipedia. Pages of this sort usually take the naming convention "[name of artist]'s [nth] studio album". There are occasional exceptions to this law, as sometimes a future album ''will'' contain enough verifiable information for a decent article even if the title is not known.<ref>For example, ''[[In Rainbows]]'' had a fully fledged article before its name was announced, because the page already contained sufficient sourced information for an article.</ref> But if all you can do is [[WP:CRYSTAL|look into a crystal ball]] or base your information off rumors posted to message boards, blogs or MySpace, then it's best ''not'' to create a page on the album until you've got something more to say. Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:There is no deadline|isn't going anywhere]]; it's not going to hurt you to wait.<ref>Also consider the fact that arguments like "''everybody'' knows it will be put out soon" or "this is going to be [name of artist]'s biggest album", or worst of all, "you just hate [name of artist], don't you?" don't hold water.</ref> |
||
Revision as of 07:28, 25 September 2009
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: If you don't even know the name of an upcoming album, you probably don't know enough about it to write an article. |
TenPoundHammer's Law: If the name and track order of a future album are not yet known, the album is very likely to see its page deleted from Wikipedia. Pages of this sort usually take the naming convention "[name of artist]'s [nth] studio album". There are occasional exceptions to this law, as sometimes a future album will contain enough verifiable information for a decent article even if the title is not known.[1] But if all you can do is look into a crystal ball or base your information off rumors posted to message boards, blogs or MySpace, then it's best not to create a page on the album until you've got something more to say. Wikipedia isn't going anywhere; it's not going to hurt you to wait.[2]
Other applications
By extension, TenPoundHammer's law can also refer to any future subject for which a name is not yet known and no verifiable information from reliable sources yet exists.[3] This might include "future" video games, movies, computer hardware, consoles, books, DVDs, software and other types of media and products. It can even apply to a future band whose name and final members aren't known.[4]
Footnotes
- ^ For example, In Rainbows had a fully fledged article before its name was announced, because the page already contained sufficient sourced information for an article.
- ^ Also consider the fact that arguments like "everybody knows it will be put out soon" or "this is going to be [name of artist]'s biggest album", or worst of all, "you just hate [name of artist], don't you?" don't hold water.
- ^ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii 2 is the first deletion discussion to cite this essay beyond the scope of albums.
- ^ Yes, that actually happened; see this comment.