User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wikipedia talk pages are not a forum. They are used to discuss issues with the article itself. Montgomery' 39 (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Are you referring to the NEDM or the Twilight article? -- (talk) 02:26, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009[edit]

Information.svg Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Twilight (2008 film) for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Pmlinediter (talk) 14:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I will try to change into a question format. It was initially meant to be a genre categorization question, but I got off topic and the discussion because more of a "wonder / daydream" as oppose to a formal question. -- (talk) 03:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Guild Wars (series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 13:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page GunZ: The Duel has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwikia\.com\b (links:

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I might consider reverting, since it is not constructive and I don't think WP:EL doesn't have a policy for note form linking to talk page. -- (talk) 18:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Deleted content request[edit]

See Category talk:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles#Request 2xeno talk 19:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The editing style reminds me of someone.[edit]

Who could that be? Hmm, ah, yes. User:Ramu50. Still the same mind-map styled unconstructive edits. -- (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


Template box[edit]

  • Hello there, I read your note about liststyle and groupstyle and looked at the talk page. There are a couple of things that have been done with other templates. One is to nest templates within templates such as is done at Portal:Roads and its template Template:Highways topics, then the content is there without the length. Therefore a template named Computer Components could be made and another named Accessories to both nest within Template:Linux devices.
  • The other thing that helps is to do make a template like the Template:Alberta rivers and lakes where the high priority or articles searched for the most and viewed the most are added to the template, and the rest are in the template as more which is a Link or direct to an article with a complete list of Rivers etc. which may also work with various aspects of the template Template:Linux devices, as some technology will be current, some will be dinosaurs, and some will be new on the market, which will help to know what to rotate in and out of the template, whilst keeping an article named "List of Linux somethings" comprehensive and well cited. Do you think making this kind of changes would help. I could help if this may be what you are aiming for.SriMesh | talk 17:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


You have been blocked by User:Tiptoety for 2 Weeks for being a sockpuppet of indef blocked User:Ramu50. As such, you are not to "play" with templates on your talk page. If you do, your access to this talk page will be blocked. If you wish to appeal your block, type {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. - NeutralHomerTalk • 19:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Please see here for evidence of your sockpuppetry. - NeutralHomerTalk • 19:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Akashic Record[edit]

I don't understand this distinction that you are attempting to make between 'spiritual science' and religion/occult, and why you think the akashic record is part of one and not the other. The article mentions it being a theosophical concept in the intro, and several prominent theosophists are mentioned as being advocates of this idea, so it seems fairly reasonable to me that it should be included in Category:Theosophy. --Clay Collier (talk) 21:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

"Akashic Experience:Science and the Cosmic Memory Field" a collaborative book written by many system scientists theorist (Ervin László included). -- (talk) 21:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Philosophy topics[edit]

The color on the template were changed to match a consistent scheme among WP:PHILO. Please do not change it again without some proposal at WT:PHILO under the discussion about the color scheme.Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 04:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Block evasion[edit]

Ramu50, please note that evading a user block is against the rules of WP (see WP:BLOCK). If you wish to appeal against the blocking of your account, please follow the instructions in WP:APPEAL - editing an closed investigation page is unlikely to help. Letdorf (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC).

Page Protection[edit]

For your blantant sockpuppetry and your continuous use of a page you are not allowed to use, I have requested this page been protected and if necessary your block on this IP extended. Wikipedia is not your "toy" that you can play with when you see necessary and I will not let any of your sandbox edits remain on this page. - NeutralHomerTalk • 02:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

I have adjusted the block to disable talk page editing. rootology (C)(T) 03:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of -graphy[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is -graphy. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-graphy (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Puppeter template.svg

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramu50 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dori ❦ (TalkContribsReview) ❦ 04:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)


This IP has been blocked for 3 months as it has been used for persistent block evasion by User:Ramu50. Access to the talk page has also been disabled. If you wish to request any unblock, then I suggest you log in under your "Ramu50" account and request through there as done in the past. MuZemike 19:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)