Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Shapley-Folkman lemma: new section |
FleetCommand (talk | contribs) →Shapley-Folkman lemma: Excellent |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Thank you! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;"> '''Kiefer'''</font>]].[[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top|Wolfowitz]]</span></small> 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
Thank you! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;"> '''Kiefer'''</font>]].[[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top|Wolfowitz]]</span></small> 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
:All I can say about its illustrations is that "I am impressed". Excellent. [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand|talk]]) 13:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:06, 8 October 2011
Text and/or other creative content from Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration was copied or moved into Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illustration has been archived to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce/Archive 1.
Move?
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Pages moved. Ucucha 23:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce → Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce —, and suggested moves of several related pages. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Discussion copied from User talk:Anthony Appleyard
- Hi, thanks for taking a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce. I'm not sure what to do with that and some related pages. I was looking at the histmerge largely because of there being a talk page on Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration with useful information, which is the main issue I had with doing a simple redirect. Also the "Taskforce" name isn't descriptive. Would
- Moving Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce to Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce
- Moving Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illustration to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce/Archive 1
- Redirecting Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration (and its talk) to Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce
- Starting the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration task force with a {{copied}} template for the WP:Illustration copy.
- Merging/redirecting Wikipedia:WikiProject SVG (after a discussion on related pages or via MFD) to the Illustration task force.
- sound like an ok solution to you? I know there's several discussions need to take place, but I recently updated Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Wikipedia#Files and its a mish mash of overlapping projects there. -Optigan13 (talk) 23:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- I could not perform the history-merge requested because the first 33 edits of Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration are WP:Parallel versions; the move from Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Taskforce to Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration was not a plain cut-and-paste move but a textmerge. See WP:Parallel versions. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Continued discussion
- Comment the current name is quite weird... an anonymously named taskforce... 70.29.210.242 (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The featured-article candidate Shapley-Folkman lemma would benefit from a review of its illustrations. The article has 3 supports and no opposes; the supports did not discuss the illustrations. A FA-specialist editor asked for a review of the illustrations.
There are two new images for the page, as well as an animation.
Thank you! Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- All I can say about its illustrations is that "I am impressed". Excellent. Fleet Command (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)