Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 34: Line 34:


Thank you! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;">&nbsp;'''Kiefer'''</font>]].[[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top|Wolfowitz]]</span></small> 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Kiefer.Wolfowitz|<font style="color:blue;background:yellow;">&nbsp;'''Kiefer'''</font>]].[[User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz#top|Wolfowitz]]</span></small> 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
:All I can say about its illustrations is that "I am impressed". Excellent. [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand|talk]]) 13:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:06, 8 October 2011

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Illustration has been archived to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce/Archive 1.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved. Ucucha 23:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]



Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/TaskforceWikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media/Illustration taskforce —, and suggested moves of several related pages. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion copied from User talk:Anthony Appleyard

Continued discussion

  • Comment the current name is quite weird... an anonymously named taskforce... 70.29.210.242 (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The featured-article candidate Shapley-Folkman lemma would benefit from a review of its illustrations. The article has 3 supports and no opposes; the supports did not discuss the illustrations. A FA-specialist editor asked for a review of the illustrations.

There are two new images for the page, as well as an animation.

Thank you!  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 13:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All I can say about its illustrations is that "I am impressed". Excellent. Fleet Command (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]