Old Saxon Baptismal Vow

The Old Saxon Baptismal Vow, also called the Old Saxon Catechism, Utrecht Baptismal Vow and Abrenuntiatio Diaboli, is a baptismal vow that was found in a ninth-century manuscript in a monastery library in Mainz, Germany. The vow mentions three Germanic pagan gods of the early Saxons which the reader is to forsake: Uuôden ("Woden"), Thunaer and Saxnōt. Scholar Rudolf Simek comments that the vow is of particular interest because it is the sole instance of the god Saxnōt mentioned in a religious context. One of many baptismal vows, it is now archived in the Vatican Codex pal. 577.^[1]

Not withstanding the conventional name of the text, there is a dispute as to how the language of the text should be categorised, as it shows features of Old English, Old Low Franconian (Old Dutch) and Old Saxon (Old Low German).

The Vow

The text (with Latin italicised) runs as follows:^[1]

1. Forsachistu diobolae?	1. Do you forsake the Devil?
& respondeat. ec forsacho diabolae.	and (s)he should reply: I forsake [the] devil.
2. end allum diobolgelde?	2. And all idolatry?
respondeat. end ec forsacho allum diobolgeldae.	(S)he should reply: And I forsake all idolatry.
3. end allum dioboles uuercum?	3. And all the devil's works?
respondeat. end ec forsacho allum dioboles uuercum and uuordum,	(S)he should reply: And I forsake all the Devil's works and promises,
Thunaer ende Uoden ende Saxnote ende allum them unholdum, the hira genotas sint.	Thunaer and Woden and Seaxnot and all those devils who are their followers.
4. gelobistu in got alamehtigan fadaer	4. Do you believe/trust in God the Almighty Father?
ec gelobo in got alamehtigan fadaer	I believe/trust in God the Almighty Father.
5. gelobistu in crist godes suno	5. Do you believe/trust in Christ, God's son?
ec gelobo in crist gotes suno.	I believe/trust in Christ, God's son.
6. Gelobistu in halogan gast.	6. Do you believe/trust in the Holy Spirit?
Ec gelobo in halogan gast.	I believe/trust in the Holy Spirit.

Language dispute

While the manuscript of the vow is ninth-century, its language seems to be from the eighth. It is undoubtedly written in a mix of different West Germanic dialects, including features that could belong to Old High German, Old Low German, Old Saxon, Old Frisian, Old Dutch (also known as Old Low Franconian), and Old English. This has led to extensive debate about where the text originated, not least because the text would stand as an important early monument to the language and traditions of whatever modern country can claim it — yet it is possible that none of these distinctions seemed very important to the people who copied and adapted the text.^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5] Key layers seem to be:

Old English (probably specifically Northumbrian Old English). This would be consistent with production in Northumbria, or by a Northumbrian missionary active alongside Saint Boniface on the Continent.
Old Saxon or Old Dutch, which could be consistent with production at or transmission via a monastery at Utrecht (in the modern Netherlands).
Old High German, which would be consistent with copying of the surviving manuscript by a speaker of this variety, perhaps at Hersfeld Abbey.

Comparison to present-day Dutch and Low German

In the glossary below, the spelling has been normalised:

<u> is replaced with <w> when a consonant
<c> is replaced with <k> and <ch> with <kh>

Original word	Modern Dutch	Modern Low German (appr.)	Modern Low Saxon	Modern English
End	En	Un	En	And
e[k]	ik	ik	ik	I
forsa[kh]o	verzaak	versak	versake	forsake
allum	alle	all	alle	all
dioboles	duivelse	Deibels	düvels	devil's
[w]ercum	werken	Warken	warken	works
and	en	un	en	and
[w]ordum	woorden	Woorten	wöörde	words
Thunær	Donar	Donar	Dunar	Thunor
ende	en	un	en	and
[W]ôden	Wodan	Wodan	Wodan	Woden
ende	en	un	en	and
Saxnôte	Saxnot	Saxnot	Saxnote	Saxnot
ende	en	un	en	and
allum	allen	all	alle	all
thêm	(van) deze	diesen	dee	those
unholdum	ontrouwen	Unmannen	unheiligen	unfaithful
thê	die	de	dee	who
hira	hun	h(i)er	öäre	their
genôtas	(bond)genoten	Genoten	genoten	companions
sint	zijn	sient	sint	are

Editions

Media related to Sächsisches Taufgelöbnis at Wikimedia Commons

Capitularia Regum Francorum I, ed. by A. Boretius, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Legum sectio 11 (Hanover, 1883), p. 22 (no. 107)
'Abrenuntiatio diaboli et prefessio fidei', ed. by E. Wadstein, Kleinere altsächsische Sprachdenkmäler, Niederdeutsche Denkmäler, 6 (Norden: Soltau, 1899), pp. 119-21
Hodgkin, R. H., A History of the Anglo-Saxons, 3rd edn., 2 vols (Oxford, 1952), I, 302 [facsimile]

References

^ ^a ^b Simek, p.276.
^ D. H. Green, Language and history in the early Germanic world (Cambridge, 1998), pp. 344-45.
^ N. van der Sijs, Calendarium van de Nederlandse Taal (2006).
^ Marco Mostert, 'Utrecht zwischen York und Fulda: Anfänge niederländischer Schriftlichkeit im Frühmittelalter Archived 2012-09-20 at the Wayback Machine', in »Wider den Müßiggang ...« Niederländisches Mittelalterim Spiegel von Kunst, Kult und Politik, ed. by Ulrike Zellmann, Angelika Lehmann-Benz and Urban Küsters (Düsseldorf: Grupello, 2004), pp. 21-37 ISBN 3-89978-018-3
^ Marco Mostert, 'Communicating the Faith: The Circle of Boniface, Germanic Vernaculars, Frisian and Saxon Converts', Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik, 70 (2013), 87-130.

Sources

Simek, Rudolf (1993), 'Saxon Baptismal Vow', in Dictionary of Northern Mythology, trans. by Angela Hall. D.S. Brewer. p. 276. ISBN 0-85991-513-1

[SIMEK276-1] Simek, p.276.

[2] D. H. Green, Language and history in the early Germanic world (Cambridge, 1998), pp. 344-45.

[3] N. van der Sijs, Calendarium van de Nederlandse Taal (2006).

[4] Marco Mostert, 'Utrecht zwischen York und Fulda: Anfänge niederländischer Schriftlichkeit im Frühmittelalter Archived 2012-09-20 at the Wayback Machine', in »Wider den Müßiggang ...« Niederländisches Mittelalterim Spiegel von Kunst, Kult und Politik, ed. by Ulrike Zellmann, Angelika Lehmann-Benz and Urban Küsters (Düsseldorf: Grupello, 2004), pp. 21-37 ISBN 3-89978-018-3

[5] Marco Mostert, 'Communicating the Faith: The Circle of Boniface, Germanic Vernaculars, Frisian and Saxon Converts', Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik, 70 (2013), 87-130.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]