Jump to content

Rigidity theory (physics)

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rziff (talk | contribs) at 21:26, 20 July 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rigidity theory, or topological constraint theory, is a tool for predicting properties of complex networks (such as glasses) based on their composition. It was introduced by James Charles Phillips in 1979[1] and 1981,[2] and refined by Michael Thorpe in 1983.[3] Inspired by the study of the stability of mechanical trusses as pioneered by James Clerk Maxwell,[4] and by the seminal work on glass structure done by William Houlder Zachariasen,[5] this theory reduces complex molecular networks to nodes (atoms, molecules, proteins, etc.) constrained by rods (chemical constraints), thus filtering out microscopic details that ultimately don't affect macroscopic properties. An equivalent theory was developed by P.K. Gupta A.R. Cooper in 1990, where rather than nodes representing atoms, they represented unit polytopes.[6] An example of this would be the SiO tetrahedra in pure glassy silica. This style of analysis has applications in biology and chemistry, such as understanding adaptability in protein-protein interaction networks.[7] Rigidity theory applied to the molecular networks arising from phenotypical expression of certain diseases may provide insights regarding their structure and function.

In molecular networks, atoms can be constrained by radial 2-body bond-stretching constraints, which keep interatomic distances fixed, and angular 3-body bond-bending constraints, which keep angles fixed around their average values. As stated by Maxwell's criterion, a mechanical truss is isostatic when the number of constraints equals the number of degrees of freedom of the nodes. In this case, the truss is optimally constrained, being rigid but free of stress. This criterion has been applied by Phillips to molecular networks, which are called flexible, stressed-rigid or isostatic when the number of constraints per atoms is respectively lower, higher or equal to 3, the number of degrees of freedom per atom in a three-dimensional system.[8] The same condition applies to random packing of spheres, which are isostatic at the jamming point. Typically, the conditions for glass formation will be optimal if the network is isostatic, which is for example the case for pure silica.[9] Flexible systems show internal degrees of freedom, called floppy modes,[3] whereas stressed-rigid ones are complexity locked by the high number of constraints and tend to crystallize instead of forming glass during a quick quenching.

Derivation of isostatic condition

The conditions for isostaticity can be derived by looking at the internal degrees of freedom of a general 3D network. For nodes, constraints, and equations of equilibrium, the number of degrees of freedom is

The node term picks up a factor of 3 due to there being translational degrees of freedom in the x, y, and z directions. By similar reasoning, in 3D, as there is one equation of equilibrium for translational and rotational modes in each dimension. This yields

This can be applied to each node in the system by normalizing by the number of nodes

where , , and the last term has been dropped since for atomistic systems . Isostatic conditions are achieved when , yielding the number of constraints per atom in the isostatic condition of .

An alternative derivation is based on analyzing the shear modulus of the 3D network or solid structure. The isostatic condition, which represents the limit of mechanical stability, is equivalent to setting in a microscopic theory of elasticity that provides as a function of the internal coordination number of nodes and of the number of degrees of freedom. The problem has been solved by Alessio Zaccone and E. Scossa-Romano in 2011, who derived the analytical formula for the shear modulus of a 3D network of central-force springs (bond-stretching constraints): .[10] Here, is the spring constant, is the distance between two nearest-neighbor nodes, the average coordination number of the network (note that here and ), and in 3D. A similar formula has been derived for 2D networks where the prefactor is instead of . Hence, based on the Zaccone–Scossa-Romano expression for , upon setting , one obtains , or equivalently in different notation, , which defines the Maxwell isostatic condition. A similar analysis can be done for 3D networks with bond-bending interactions (on top of bond-stretching), which leads to the isostatic condition , with a lower threshold due to the angular constraints imposed by bond-bending.[11]

Developments in glass science

Rigidity theory allows the prediction of optimal isostatic compositions, as well as the composition dependence of glass properties, by a simple enumeration of constraints.[12] These glass properties include, but are not limited to, elastic modulus, shear modulus, bulk modulus, density, Poisson's ratio, coefficient of thermal expansion, hardness,[13] and toughness. In some systems, due to the difficulty of directly enumerating constraints by hand and knowing all system information a priori, the theory is often employed in conjunction with computational methods in materials science such as molecular dynamics (MD). Notably, the theory played a major role in the development of Gorilla Glass 3.[14] Extended to glasses at finite temperature[15] and finite pressure,[16] rigidity theory has been used to predict glass transition temperature, viscosity and mechanical properties.[8] It was also applied to granular materials[17] and proteins.[18]

In the context of soft glasses, rigidity theory has been used by Alessio Zaccone and Eugene Terentjev to predict the glass transition temperature of polymers and to provide a molecular-level derivation and interpretation of the Flory–Fox equation.[19] The Zaccone–Terentjev theory also provides an expression for the shear modulus of glassy polymers as a function of temperature which is in quantitative agreement with experimental data, and is able to describe the many orders of magnitude drop of the shear modulus upon approaching the glass transition from below.[19]

In 2001, Boolchand and coworkers found that the isostatic compositions in glassy alloys—predicted by rigidity theory—exist not just at a single threshold composition; rather, in many systems it spans a small, well-defined range of compositions intermediate to the flexible (under-constrained) and stressed-rigid (over-constrained) domains.[20] This window of optimally constrained glasses is thus referred to as the intermediate phase or the reversibility window, as the glass formation is supposed to be reversible, with minimal hysteresis, inside the window.[20] Its existence has been attributed to the glassy network consisting almost exclusively of a varying population of isostatic molecular structures.[16][21] The existence of the intermediate phase remains a controversial, but stimulating topic in glass science.


See also


References

  1. ^ Phillips, J. C. (1979). "Topology of covalent non-crystalline solids I: Short-range order in chalcogenide alloys". Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 34 (2): 153–181. Bibcode:1979JNCS...34..153P. doi:10.1016/0022-3093(79)90033-4.
  2. ^ Phillips, J. C. (1981-01-01). "Topology of covalent non-crystalline solids II: Medium-range order in chalcogenide alloys and A-Si(Ge)". Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 43 (1): 37–77. doi:10.1016/0022-3093(81)90172-1. ISSN 0022-3093.
  3. ^ a b Thorpe, M. F. (1983). "Continuous deformations in random networks". Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 57 (3): 355–370. Bibcode:1983JNCS...57..355T. doi:10.1016/0022-3093(83)90424-6.
  4. ^ Maxwell, J. Clerk (April 1864). "XLV. On reciprocal figures and diagrams of forces". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 27 (182): 250–261. doi:10.1080/14786446408643663. ISSN 1941-5982.
  5. ^ Zachariasen, W. H. (October 1932). "The Atomic Arrangement in Glass". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 54 (10): 3841–3851. doi:10.1021/ja01349a006. ISSN 0002-7863.
  6. ^ Gupta, P. K.; Cooper, A. R. (1990-08-02). "Topologically disordered networks of rigid polytopes". Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. XVth International Congress on Glass. 123 (1): 14–21. Bibcode:1990JNCS..123...14G. doi:10.1016/0022-3093(90)90768-H. ISSN 0022-3093.
  7. ^ Sharma, Ankush; Maria Brigida Ferraro; Maiorano, Francesco; Francesca Del Vecchio Blanco; Mario Rosario Guarracino (2014). "Rigidity and flexibility in protein-protein interaction networks: A case study on neuromuscular disorders". arXiv:1402.2304 [q-bio.MN].
  8. ^ a b Mauro, J. C. (May 2011). "Topological constraint theory of glass" (PDF). Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull.[permanent dead link‍]
  9. ^ Bauchy, M.; Micoulaut; Celino; Le Roux; Boero; Massobrio (August 2011). "Angular rigidity in tetrahedral network glasses with changing composition". Physical Review B. 84 (5): 054201. Bibcode:2011PhRvB..84e4201B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.054201.
  10. ^ Zaccone, A.; Scossa-Romano, E. (2011). "Approximate analytical description of the nonaffine response of amorphous solids". Physical Review B. 83 (18): 184205. arXiv:1102.0162. Bibcode:2011PhRvB..83r4205Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.184205. S2CID 119256092.
  11. ^ Zaccone, A. (2013). "Elastic Deformations in Covalent Amorphous Solids". Modern Physics Letters B. 27 (5): 1330002. Bibcode:2013MPLB...2730002Z. doi:10.1142/S0217984913300020.
  12. ^ Bauchy, Mathieu (2019-03-01). "Deciphering the atomic genome of glasses by topological constraint theory and molecular dynamics: A review". Computational Materials Science. 159: 95–102. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.12.004. ISSN 0927-0256. S2CID 139431823.
  13. ^ Smedskjaer, Morten M.; Mauro, John C.; Yue, Yuanzheng (2010-09-08). "Prediction of Glass Hardness Using Temperature-Dependent Constraint Theory". Physical Review Letters. 105 (11): 115503. Bibcode:2010PhRvL.105k5503S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.115503. PMID 20867584.
  14. ^ Wray, Peter (7 January 2013). "Gorilla Glass 3 explained (and it is a modeling first for Corning!)". Ceramic Tech Today. The American Ceramic Society. Retrieved 24 January 2014.
  15. ^ Smedskjaer, M. M.; Mauro; Sen; Yue (September 2010). "Quantitative Design of Glassy Materials Using Temperature-Dependent Constraint Theory". Chemistry of Materials. 22 (18): 5358–5365. doi:10.1021/cm1016799.
  16. ^ a b Bauchy, M.; Micoulaut (February 2013). "Transport Anomalies and Adaptative Pressure-Dependent Topological Constraints in Tetrahedral Liquids: Evidence for a Reversibility Window Analogue". Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (9): 095501. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110i5501B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.095501. PMID 23496720.
  17. ^ Moukarzel, Cristian F. (March 1998). "Isostatic Phase Transition and Instability in Stiff Granular Materials". Physical Review Letters. 81 (8): 1634. arXiv:cond-mat/9803120. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..81.1634M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1634. S2CID 119436288.
  18. ^ Phillips, J. C. (2004). "Constraint theory and hierarchical protein dynamics". J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 16 (44): S5065–S5072. Bibcode:2004JPCM...16S5065P. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/44/004. S2CID 250821575.
  19. ^ a b Zaccone, A.; Terentjev, E. (2013). "Disorder-Assisted Melting and the Glass Transition in Amorphous Solids". Physical Review Letters. 110 (17): 178002. arXiv:1212.2020. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110q8002Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.178002. PMID 23679782. S2CID 15600577.
  20. ^ a b Boolchand, P.; Georgiev, Goodman (2001). "Discovery of the intermediate phase in chalcogenide glasses" (PDF). Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials. 3 (3): 703–720. Archived from the original on February 3, 2014.
  21. ^ Bauchy, M.; Micoulaut; Boero; Massobrio (April 2013). "Compositional Thresholds and Anomalies in Connection with Stiffness Transitions in Network Glasses". Physical Review Letters. 110 (16): 165501. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110p5501B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.165501. PMID 23679615.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rigidity_theory_(physics)&oldid=1166330252"