Jump to content

Nonrecursive ordinal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheMathCat (talk | contribs) at 16:49, 28 August 2023 (a reference updated). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In mathematics, particularly set theory, non-recursive ordinals are large countable ordinals greater than all the recursive ordinals, and therefore can not be expressed using recursive ordinal notations.

The Church–Kleene ordinal and variants

The smallest non-recursive ordinal is the Church Kleene ordinal, , named after Alonzo Church and S. C. Kleene; its order type is the set of all recursive ordinals. Since the successor of a recursive ordinal is recursive, the Church–Kleene ordinal is a limit ordinal. It is also the smallest ordinal that is not hyperarithmetical, and the smallest admissible ordinal after (an ordinal is called admissible if .) The -recursive subsets of are exactly the subsets of .[1]

The notation is in reference to , the first uncountable ordinal, which is the set of all countable ordinals, analogously to how the Church-Kleene ordinal is the set of all recursive ordinals. Some old sources use to denote the Church-Kleene ordinal.[2]

For a set , A set is x-computable if it is computable from a Turing machine with an oracle state that queries x. The relativized Church–Kleene ordinal is the supremum of the order types of x-computable relations. The Friedman-Jensen-Sacks theorem states that for every countable admissible ordinal , there exists a set x such that .[3]

, first defined by Stephen G. Simpson[citation needed] is an extension of the Church–Kleene ordinal. This is the smallest limit of admissible ordinals, yet this ordinal is not admissible. Alternatively, this is the smallest α such that is a model of -comprehension.

Recursively ordinals

The th admissible ordinal is sometimes denoted by .[4][5]

Recursively "x" ordinals, where "x" typically represents a large cardinal property, are kinds of nonrecursive ordinals.[6]

An ordinal is called recursively inaccessible if it is admissible and a limit of admissibles. Alternatively, is recursively inaccessible iff is the th admissible ordinal,[5] or iff , an extension of Kripke–Platek set theory stating that each set is contained in a model of Kripke–Platek set theory. Under the condition that ("every set is hereditarily countable"), is recursively inaccessible iff is a model of -comprehension.[7]

An ordinal is called recursively hyperinaccessible if it is recursively inaccessible and a limit of recursively inaccessibles, or where is the th recursively inaccessible. Like "hyper-inaccessible cardinal", different authors conflict on this terminology.

An ordinal is called recursively Mahlo if it is admissible and for any -recursive function there is an admissible such that (that is, is closed under ).[2] Mirroring the Mahloness hierarchy, is recursively -Mahlo for an ordinal if it is admissible and for any -recursive function there is an admissible ordinal such that is closed under , and is recursively -Mahlo for all .[6]

An ordinal is called recursively weakly compact if it is -reflecting, or equivalently,[2] 2-admissible. These ordinals have strong recursive Mahloness properties, if α is -reflecting then is recursively -Mahlo.[6]

Weakenings of stable ordinals

An ordinal is stable if is a -elementary-substructure of , denoted .[8] These are some of the largest named nonrecursive ordinals appearing in a model-theoretic context, for instance greater than for any computably axiomatizable theory .[9]Proposition 0.7. There are various weakenings of stable ordinals:[1]

  • A countable ordinal is called -stable iff .
    • The smallest -stable ordinal is much larger than the smallest recursively weakly compact ordinal: it has been shown that the smallest -stable ordinal is -reflecting for all finite .[2]
    • In general, a countable ordinal is called -stable iff .
  • A countable ordinal is called -stable iff , where is the smallest admissible ordinal . The smallest -stable ordinal is again much larger than the smallest -stable or the smallest -stable for any constant .
  • A countable ordinal is called -stable iff , where are the two smallest admissible ordinals . The smallest -stable ordinal is larger than the smallest -reflecting.
  • A countable ordinal is called inaccessibly-stable iff , where is the smallest recursively inaccessible ordinal . The smallest inaccessibly-stable ordinal is larger than the smallest -stable.
  • A countable ordinal is called Mahlo-stable iff , where is the smallest recursively Mahlo ordinal . The smallest Mahlo-stable ordinal is larger than the smallest inaccessibly-stable.
  • A countable ordinal is called doubly -stable iff . The smallest doubly -stable ordinal is larger than the smallest Mahlo-stable.

Larger nonrecursive ordinals

  • The least ordinal such that where is the smallest nonprojectible ordinal.
  • An ordinal is nonprojectible if is a limit of -stable ordinals, or; if the set is unbounded in .
  • The ordinal of ramified analysis, often written as . This is the smallest such that is a model of second-order comprehension, or , without the powerset axiom.
  • The least ordinal such that . This ordinal has been characterized by Toshiyasu Arai.[10]
  • The least ordinal such that .
  • The least stable ordinal.

References

  1. ^ a b D. Madore, A Zoo of Ordinals (2017). Accessed September 2021.
  2. ^ a b c d W. Richter, P. Aczel, Inductive Definitions and Reflecting Properties of Admissible Ordinals (1973, p.15). Accessed 2021 October 28.
  3. ^ Sacks, Gerald E. (1976), "Countable admissible ordinals and hyperdegrees", Advances in Mathematics, 19 (2): 213–262, doi:10.1016/0001-8708(76)90187-0
  4. ^ P. G. Hinman, Recursion-Theoretic Hierarchies (1978), pp.419--420. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, ISBN 3-540-07904-1.
  5. ^ a b J. Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures (1976), pp.174--176. Perspectives in Logic, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 3-540-07451-1.
  6. ^ a b c Rathjen, Michael (1994), "Proof theory of reflection" (PDF), Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 68 (2): 181–224, doi:10.1016/0168-0072(94)90074-4
  7. ^ W. Marek, Some comments on the paper by Artigue, Isambert, Perrin, and Zalc (1976), ICM. Accessed 19 May 2023.
  8. ^ J. Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures (1976), Cambridge University Press, Perspectives in Logic.
  9. ^ W. Marek, K. Rasmussen, Spectrum of L in libraries (WorldCat catalog) (EuDML page), Państwowe Wydawn. Accessed 2022-12-01.
  10. ^ T. Arai, A Sneak Preview of Proof Theory of Ordinals (1997, p.17). Accessed 2021 October 28.