Henwood v Municipal Tramways Trust
| Henwood v Municipal Tramways Trust (SA) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | High Court of Australia |
| Decided | 30 June 1938 |
| Citations | [1938] HCA 35, (1938) 60 CLR 438 |
| Case history | |
| Prior action | [1937] SASR 390 |
| Appealed from | Supreme Court (SA) |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Latham CJ, Starke, Dixon and McTiernan JJ |
Henwood v Municipal Tramways Trust (SA),[1] was a significant Australian court case, decided in the High Court of Australia on 30 June 1938. The case was an influential decision in the law of negligence and is an authority for the proposition that the unlawful act of the deceased did not absolve the Trust from civil liability for its negligence.[2]
Brief overview
[edit]Henwood, while riding the tram, was overcome by a fit of nausea and stuck his head out the window. This breached a bylaw made by the tram authority as a safety precaution, and he was struck twice by standards outside the tram.
Ruling
[edit]It was held that although he was breaking the law, he was still under the protection of the law, and as such the Tramways Trust was liable for negligence in allowing him to be struck.
"It was there held that there is no general rule denying a person who is doing an unlawful act the protection of the general law imposing upon others duties of care for his safety."[3]
This makes more sense when you look at another example, again mentioned by Finnegan P, of an occupier who shoots someone breaking into the house, such as Revill v Newbery,[4] where the defendant shot the plaintiff who was breaking and entering. The defendant, or the occupier, was held liable for criminal damages, even though it was in defence of his home. In that case the plaintiff was also held liable for trespass.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Henwood v Municipal Tramways Trust (SA) [1938] HCA 35, (1938) 60 CLR 438 (30 June 1938), High Court (Australia).
- ^ Cowen, Z (1941). "Case notes: Henwood v Municipal Tramways Trust". Res Judicatae (University of Melbourne). (1941) 2 Res Judicatae 91.
- ^ Anderson v Cooke [2005] IEHC 221 (29 June 2005), High Court (Ireland) per Finnegan P.
- ^ Revill v Newbery [1995] EWCA Civ 10, [1996] 1 All ER 291.
 | This article related to Australian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |