Aulacodes

Aulacodes
Aulacodes lunalis
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Arthropoda
Class:	Insecta
Order:	Lepidoptera
Family:	Crambidae
Genus:	Aulacodes Guenée, 1854
Synonyms
Hydrophysa Guenée, 1854

Aulacodes is a genus of moths of the family Crambidae. The genus was first described by Achille Guenée in 1854.

Species

• Aulacodes adiantealis (Walker, 1859)
• Aulacodes adjutrealis Schaus, 1924
• Aulacodes aechmialis Guenée, 1854
• Aulacodes bipunctalis Kenrick, 1907
• Aulacodes briocusalis (Schaus, 1924)
• Aulacodes caepiosalis (Walker, 1859)
• Aulacodes cervinalis (Hampson, 1897)
• Aulacodes chalcialis (Hampson, 1906)
• Aulacodes chionostola (Hampson, 1917)
• Aulacodes cilianalis (Schaus, 1924)
• Aulacodes citronalis (Druce, 1896)
• Aulacodes confusalis Schaus, 1906
• Aulacodes congallalis Schaus, 1924
• Aulacodes convoluta Hampson, 1897
• Aulacodes cuprescens (Hampson, 1912)
• Aulacodes delicata Schaus, 1912
• Aulacodes exhibitalis (Walker, 1862)
• Aulacodes filigeralis (Walker, 1866)
• Aulacodes fragmentalis (Lederer, 1863)
• Aulacodes gothicalis (C. Felder, R. Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875)
• Aulacodes halitalis (C. Felder, R. Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875)
• Aulacodes hodevalis (Druce, 1896)
• Aulacodes ilialis (Walker, 1859)
• Aulacodes julittalis Schaus, 1924
• Aulacodes lunalis Kenrick, 1907
• Aulacodes melanicalis (Hampson, 1917)
• Aulacodes mesoleucalis (Hampson, 1917)
• Aulacodes methodica Meyrick, 1936
• Aulacodes moralis Schaus, 1906
• Aulacodes obtusalis Dyar, 1914
• Aulacodes pampalis Schaus, 1906
• Aulacodes peribocalis (Walker, 1859)
• Aulacodes pulchralis (Rothschild, 1915)
• Aulacodes purpurealis Kenrick, 1907
• Aulacodes psyllalis (Guenée, 1854)
• Aulacodes pulcherialis (Druce, 1896)
• Aulacodes reversalis Dyar, 1914
• Aulacodes scaralis (Schaus, 1906)
• Aulacodes semicircularis Hampson, 1897
• Aulacodes templalis Schaus, 1906
• Aulacodes traversalis Dyar, 1914
• Aulacodes trigonalis (Hampson, 1906)

Former species

• Aulacodes hamalis Snellen, 1875

Furthermore, "A." eupselias was erroneously assigned to this genus at first; it is actually not very closely related by grass moth standards and nowadays placed in the monotypic genus Marasmianympha.