Paul v NALGO

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legis (talk | contribs) at 18:30, 17 June 2018 (→‎Judgment: Nick Browne-Wilkinson, Baron Browne-Wilkinson). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Paul v NALGO
CourtHigh Court of Justice
Citation(s)[1987] IRLR 413
Keywords
Trade union, governance

Paul v NALGO [1987] IRLR 413 is a UK labour law case, concerning the governance of trade unions in the United Kingdom.

Facts

P and F, members of NALGO, claimed the union’s publications against the Tories were unlawful under Trade Union Act 1913, section 3(3)(f) providing funds could not be used to persuade people to not vote for a candidate – unless there had been a political objects clause, under what is now Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, section 72(1)(f).

Judgment

Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson VC held the literature was unlawful under the TUA 1913 s 3(3)(f) as its main purpose was to persuade people to not vote Tory, and so was unlawful.

See also

Notes

References

External links