Rex v. Scofield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Deccantrap (talk | contribs) at 01:13, 8 March 2019 (Added country of origin of court case (WP:EXPLAINLEAD).). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rex v. Scofield, Cald. 397 (1784), is a British criminal law case that made attempt part of the common law, emphasizing the intent of an actor over the incomplete criminal act.[1] Scofield lit a candle and placed it into flammable material in a house with the intent to burn it down, but the larger fire never happened.[1]: 669  Finding crime in the incomplete but intended act of arson, Lord Mansfield held that "completion of an act, criminal in itself, [was not] necessary to constitute criminality", and "The intent may make an act, innocent in itself, criminal..."[1]: 669 

References

  1. ^ a b c Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyora Binder, ISBN 978-1-4548-0698-1, [1]