Jump to content

Siegel's lemma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 01:53, 2 April 2020 (Alter: volume. Add: doi, issue. Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Activated by AManWithNoPlan | All pages linked from User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox2 | via #UCB_webform_linked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In transcendental number theory and Diophantine approximation, Siegel's lemma refers to bounds on the solutions of linear equations obtained by the construction of auxiliary functions. The existence of these polynomials was proven by Axel Thue;[1] Thue's proof used Dirichlet's box principle. Carl Ludwig Siegel published his lemma in 1929.[2] It is a pure existence theorem for a system of linear equations.

Siegel's lemma has been refined in recent years to produce sharper bounds on the estimates given by the lemma.[3]

Statement

Suppose we are given a system of M linear equations in N unknowns such that N > M, say

where the coefficients are rational integers, not all 0, and bounded by B. The system then has a solution

with the Xs all rational integers, not all 0, and bounded by

[4]

Bombieri & Vaaler (1983) gave the following sharper bound for the X's:

where D is the greatest common divisor of the M by M minors of the matrix A, and AT is its transpose. Their proof involved replacing the Dirichlet box principle by techniques from the geometry of numbers.

See also

References

  1. ^ Thue, Axel (1909). "Über Annäherungswerte algebraischer Zahlen". J. Reine Angew. Math. 1909 (135): 284–305. doi:10.1515/crll.1909.135.284. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  2. ^ Siegel, Carl Ludwig (1929). "Über einige Anwendungen diophantischer Approximationen". Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. Kl.: 41–69. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help), reprinted in Gesammelte Abhandlungen, volume 1; the lemma is stated on page 213
  3. ^ Bombieri, E.; Mueller, J. (1983). "On effective measures of irrationality for and related numbers". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 342: 173–196.
  4. ^ (Hindry & Silverman 2000) Lemma D.4.1, page 316.