Jump to content

Koszul–Tate resolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OAbot (talk | contribs) at 23:17, 15 April 2020 (Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In mathematics, a Koszul–Tate resolution or Koszul–Tate complex of the quotient ring R/M is a projective resolution of it as an R-module which also has a structure of a dg-algebra over R, where R is a commutative ring and MR is an ideal. They were introduced by Tate (1957) as a generalization of the Koszul resolution for the quotient R/(x1, ...., xn) of R by a regular sequence of elements. Friedemann Brandt, Glenn Barnich, and Marc Henneaux (2000) used the Koszul–Tate resolution to calculate BRST cohomology. The differential of this complex is called the Koszul–Tate derivation or Koszul–Tate differential.

Construction

First suppose for simplicity that all rings contain the rational numbers Q. Assume we have a graded supercommutative ring X, so that

ab = (−1)deg(a)deg (b)ba,

with a differential d, with

d(ab) = d(a)b + (−1)deg(a)ad(b)),

and xX is a homogeneous cycle (dx = 0). Then we can form a new ring

Y = X[T]

of polynomials in a variable T, where the differential is extended to T by

dT=x.

(The polynomial ring is understood in the super sense, so if T has odd degree then T2 = 0.) The result of adding the element T is to kill off the element of the homology of X represented by x, and Y is still a supercommutative ring with derivation.

A Koszul–Tate resolution of R/M can be constructed as follows. We start with the commutative ring R (graded so that all elements have degree 0). Then add new variables as above of degree 1 to kill off all elements of the ideal M in the homology. Then keep on adding more and more new variables (possibly an infinite number) to kill off all homology of positive degree. We end up with a supercommutative graded ring with derivation d whose homology is just R/M.

If we are not working over a field of characteristic 0, the construction above still works, but it is usually neater to use the following variation of it. Instead of using polynomial rings X[T], one can use a "polynomial ring with divided powers" XT〉, which has a basis of elements

T(i) for i ≥ 0,

where

T(i)T(j) = ((i + j)!/i!j!)T(i+j).

Over a field of characteristic 0,

T(i) is just Ti/i!.

See also

References

  • Brandt, Friedemann; Barnich, Glenn; Henneaux, Marc (2000), "Local BRST cohomology in gauge theories", Physics Reports. A Review Section of Physics Letters, 338 (5): 439–569, arXiv:hep-th/0002245, Bibcode:2000PhR...338..439B, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00049-1, ISSN 0370-1573, MR 1792979
  • Koszul, Jean-Louis (1950), "Homologie et cohomologie des algèbres de Lie", Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 78: 65–127, doi:10.24033/bsmf.1410, ISSN 0037-9484, MR 0036511
  • Tate, John (1957), "Homology of Noetherian rings and local rings", Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 1: 14–27, doi:10.1215/ijm/1255378502, ISSN 0019-2082, MR 0086072
  • M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton University Press, 1992
  • Verbovetsky, Alexander (2002), "Remarks on two approaches to the horizontal cohomology: compatibility complex and the Koszul–Tate resolution", Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 72 (1): 123–131, arXiv:math/0105207, doi:10.1023/A:1015276007463, ISSN 0167-8019, MR 1907621