Jump to content

Department of Justice v. House Committee on the Judiciary

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Masem (talk | contribs) at 15:40, 3 July 2020 (→Background). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

United States Department of Justice v. Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Full case name In re Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, for an Order Authorizing the Release of Certain Grand Jury Materials — Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives v. United States Department of Justice
ArguedJanuary 3, 2020
DecidedMarch 10, 2020
Citation19-1328; No. 19-5288
Case history
Prior historyApplication granted, In re Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, for an Order Authorizing the Release of Certain Grand Jury Materials,[1] No. 1:19-gj-00048-BAH (D. D.C. 2019)
Court membership
Judges sittingCircuit Judges Judith W. Rogers, Thomas B. Griffith, Neomi Rao
Laws applied
Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Department of Justice v. House Committee on the Judiciary (2020), No. 19-1328[2] (previously In re Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, No. 19-5288), is a case pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. The case weighs whether a committee of the House of Representatives can assert the House's "sole power of impeachment" to subpoena materials gathered as part of a federal grand jury investigation which are ordinarily secret.

Background

Main articles: Special Counsel investigation (2017–2019) and Mueller Report

Robert Mueller had been appointed as Special Counsel by United States Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to investigate possible Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. The investigation ran from 2017 to 2019. Among his investigation, Mueller assembled a grand jury empowered to subpoena documents, require witnesses to testify under oath, and issue indictments for targets of criminal charges if probable cause was found. Proceedings of the grand jury were keep in confidence. Mueller delivered his final report, Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election but informally called the Mueller Report, to United States Attorney General William Barr on March 22, 2019. A heavily-redacted version of the Mueller report was issued on April 18, 2019, which President Donald Trump stated later was due to executive privilege.[3] The redacted report omitted much of the grand jury proceedings. While Mueller's Report concluded there was no evidence of Russian interference, and while there was no conclusive evidence of any crime committed by Trump, it "does not exonerate him".[4]

The Mueller Report findings gave a strong basis for the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives to consider starting impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump. Mueller testified to several House committees on July 24, 2019 on details of the report, but still limited to what he could speak by the prior executive privilege.[5][6]

On July 26, 2019, the House Judiciary Committee filed an application with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to release certain grand jury materials associated with Mulluer's investigation.[7] In October 2019, based on precedent established during the impeachment of Richard Nixon, the court granted the application. However, the Department of Justice immediately sought a stay for the subpoena. [1]

Case history

On December 13, 2019, the D.C Circuit's panel of Rogers, Griffith, and Rao ordered a briefing to address whether the House Judiciary Committee has Article III standing.[8]

On December 16, 2019, House General Counselor Douglas Letter filed a brief outlining the importance of obtaining the grand jury materials.[9][10]

On December 18, 2019, the D.C. Circuit ordered the parties involved to file supplemental briefings by December 23, 2019 addressing whether articles of impeachment render the case moot and whether expedited consideration is still necessary. The D.C. Circuit also suggested the House Judiciary Committee address whether it still seeks the materials from Robert Mueller's grand jury.[11][12]

On December 23, 2019 the House Judiciary Committee and Justice Department filed supplemental briefings explaining their positions on standing and mootness.[13]

The case was argued earlier before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Friday, January 3, 2020. The case was heard by a panel of three Circuit Judges: Judith W. Rogers, Thomas B. Griffith, and Neomi Rao.[1]

On March 10, 2020, the court ruled 2–1 in favor of the Judiciary Committee, ordering the release of the grand jury materials; Judge Rogers wrote the opinion, joined by Judge Griffith, and Judge Rao dissented.[14] Shortly before the court-mandated deadline to produce the material, the DOJ petitioned SCOTUS to stay the ruling and review the case. The Court stayed the Circuit's mandate on May 8, 2020. In June, the Department of Justice and the House Judiciary Committee filed petitions for and against a writ of certiorari.[15]

On July 2, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the Justice Department request for a writ of certiorari appealing the decision of the D.C. Circuit court, which it will plan to hear during the 2020–2021 term.[16]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives v. United States Department of Justice" (PDF) – via Politico.
  2. ^ "Docket for 19-1328". Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
  3. ^ Mangan, Dan (May 8, 2019). "Trump asserts 'executive privilege' over Mueller report in fight with House Democrats". CNBC. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  4. ^ "Main points of Mueller report". Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on April 20, 2019. Retrieved April 20, 2019.
  5. ^ Desiderio, Andrew; Cheney, Kyle (July 24, 2019). "Mueller refutes Trump's 'no collusion, no obstruction' line". Politico. Retrieved July 24, 2019.
  6. ^ Gregorian, Dareh (July 24, 2019). "Mueller clarifies comments on whether he could indict Trump". NBC News. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  7. ^ Herb, Jeremy; Raju, Manu (July 3, 2020). "House Democrats escalate impeachment fight with suit to obtain Mueller grand jury information". CNN. Retrieved July 3, 2020.
  8. ^ Appeals Court Appears Unsure If House Can Sue To Get Mueller Grand Jury Docs
  9. ^ House vows to continue impeachment probes regardless of Senate outcome
  10. ^ [1]
  11. ^ Appeals court wants answers on impact of impeachment
  12. ^ [2]
  13. ^ DOJ, House Weigh In On How Impeachment Affects Mueller Grand Jury Doc Case
  14. ^ Legare, Robert; Quinn, Melissa (March 10, 2020). "Appeals court orders DOJ to turn over secret Mueller grand jury docs to Congress". CBS News. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
  15. ^ de Vogue, Ariane (May 8, 2020). "Roberts agrees to put lower court mandate on temporary hold in Mueller grand jury secrets case". CNN. Retrieved 17 June 2020.
  16. ^ [3]

Further reading

  • Anderson, Derrick (2019). "Executive Privilege, the Trump Administration, and the Mueller Investigation: Legal Crossroads of Privileges Waiting to be Defined". Working Paper. SSRN 3367982.
  • McKnight, Brent (2020). "Keeping Secrets: The Unsettled Law of Judge-Made Exceptions to Grand Jury Secrecy". Duke Law Journal. 70: ____. SSRN 3552949.
Flag of United StatesJustice icon

This article relating to law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Justice_v._House_Committee_on_the_Judiciary&oldid=965815342"