Jump to content

Natural gas in Papua New Guinea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tenryuu (talk | contribs) at 02:29, 12 July 2020 (Second copyedit done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

PNG Gas, or Papua New Guinea Gas, has been an exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in Papua New Guinea since 2014.[1] The LNG sector is important in the PNG's economy: the value of LNG exports in 2017 was estimated to be at US$3.6 billion while GDP[2] was estimated to be at US$20.5 billion. On a global scale, PNG is a minor producer. In 2017, PNG acquired the 17th rank on the list of exporting countries; its exports covered 1.5% of the world's total exported LNG.[3] There are four LNG projects in PNG; only the Hides Project is fully operational. An agreement was made between the PNG government and a consortium of companies to develop the second project: the "Elk/Antelope" field. These companies cooperate under the Papua-LNG project. The development of the third project, the "Pn’yang Gas Field", is in an advanced planning stage. The fourth LNG project in development is the "Western Gas" field. The benefits of LNG development for the country is a controversial issue. Government participation in the projects is controversial and has been a dominant theme in PNG politics in the past decade. It became a major issue in the events leading to the resignation of Peter O'Neill as prime minister.

PNG/LNG

The Hides gas field is the main field operated by LNG/PNG and was discovered in 1987 by BP, who sold it to Oil Search company. Originally, the idea was to transport the gas through a pipeline to Australia. Chevron was the big fossil fuel company that would carry it forward. It came close to a production phase but the project was dropped in 2007 after Australian customers dropped out of the conditional sales agreements.[4] At present Australia exports a manifold of LNG compared to PNG and the project would not be of interest for that market anymore. In 2008 ExxonMobil assumed leadership to develop a gas project sourcing the Hides field to export LNG to the Asian market. The project was completed in 2014 after rapidly completing planning and construction phases:[5]

  • 2008 (a): Cooperating partners came to an agreement. Shareholding in LNG/PNG is distributed as follows: Exxon Mobil (32.2%) ; Oil Search Ltd. (29%); Kumul holdings representing the PNG government)(16.2%) Santos Limited (13,5 %%); Mineral Resources Development Company (MRDC)representing landowners, (2.8%): JX Nippon Oil and Gas exploration (4.7%)[6]
  • 2008 (b): The fiscal and legal environment was established through a Gas agreement between the participating partners (ExxonMobil; Oil Search, Santos, the IPBC and MRDC) and the government of PNG. It also laid down the proposed government equity in the project.
  • 2008 (c): An economics impact study was commissioned by ExxonMobil from the Australian consulting firm Acil/Tasman, nowadays ACIL Allen Consulting. It outlined many beneficial effects of the project for PNG.[7]
  • 2008 (d): At the end of the year the FEED (Front End engineering and Design) stage was reached.
  • 2009 (a): In October agreement was reached on environmental impact with the PNG government, The environmental Impact Statement was based on 16 studies.
  • 2009 (b): Final agreement among partners paving the way for production.
  • 2010: Sales and marketing agreements were completed with four major customers: JERA (for the Tokyo Electric Power Company); Osaka Gas, Sinopec (China Petroleum and chemical Corporation);CPC Corporation, Taiwan [8]
  • 2011: Financing arrangements with the lenders to the project completed. The project was heavily geared. Loan capital (US$14 billion) was much bigger than share capital (US$3.3. billion)[9] These loans were sourced in the first place from export credit agencies and were therefore government-guaranteed (US$8.3 billion) Commercial Banks were the second source for loan capital (US$1.95 billion) a Thirdly, Exxon Mobil, the company executing the project lent money (US$3.95 billion).[10]
  • 2009-2014: The construction of the LNG project consisted of a distinct number of sub-projects. Seven gas fields supply the project; the primary field is the Hides gas field in Hela province. It required drilling eight boreholes 3600 m deep. A gas conditioning plant was built in Hides where the gas is separated from oil and water. The gas is then transported to the coast for shipping, which required a pipeline of 290 km to the mouth of the Omati river. This pipeline was extended under water for 407 km to Caution Bay near where the LNG processing plant is in Port Moresby. At Caution Bay gas is chilled to -161 °C to liquefy it for transportation. Two processing plants – called trains – were built. Two huge storage tanks were built auxiliary to this. A loading pier for LNG tankers was constructed. The Hides gas field produces a mixture of oil and gas (condensate). The oil is separated in the highlands and transported in a separate pipeline to Oil Search's loading facilities for the Kutubu oilfield at the Kumul Marine Terminal offshore in Gulf Province. The construction of these projects was in extremely difficult terrain consisting either of very steep mountain ranges in the highlands or swamps near the coast. The project built at Hides a special long runway that could take Antonovs – the largest cargo planes in the world – to bring in material as road transport could not cope with this.[11][12][13] Oil Search acquired the management contract for the Hides installations and Exxon Mobil managed the installations at Caution Bay.

Project achievements

The construction of PNG/LNG is a major engineering achievement: it was a massive project in difficult terrain. The project was completed ahead of schedule in 2014, though there was an expenditure overshoot of US$3.3 billion.[14][15]

The project required PNG citizens to be extensively trained: 10,000 citizens during the time of construction. The project employed 2,600 citizens after construction and they constituted 82 percent of the workforce; 22 percent were women.[16]

The project produced above-planned capacity: it was expected to produce 6.9 million tonnes of LNG per year, but the actual average output was 8 million tonnes a year. In 2017 the production was 8.3 million tonnes. It decreased to 7.5 million tonnes in 2018 due to earthquake shutting down plants. The plant resumed operations after 8 weeks. It is estimated on the basis of the highest monthly figures that output may grow to 9.2 million tons

The project is an inexpensive producer. According to an analysis by consulting firm Wood Mackenzie and Credit Suisse, the project's break-even price of around $7.40 per million British Thermal Units compares favorably to an average over $10 per million BTU for eight recent gas projects in the region.[17]

The project does not only focus on the major Hides gas field. Project gas is sourced from seven fields: the Hides, Angore, and Juha gas fields, and the Oil Search-operated Kutubu, Agogo, Moran, and Gobe Main oil fields, provide approximately 20% of PNG LNG Project gas. Gas is also purchased on a third party basis from the SE Gobe field.[18]

Gas field reserves were re-evaluated in 2016, which resulted in an estimated increase of 50% when compared with the estimates made before construction in 2009.[19]

Negative aspects of the project

ExxonMobil commissioned a study to Australian consulting firm ACIL-Tasman to calculate the benefits and costs to PNG; they projected large gains for the PNG economy as a result of the project. However, in a study commissioned by Jubilee Australia, two Australian economists – Paul Flanagan and Luke Fletcher – compared the predictions of this report in 2018 with actual outcomes. They found an actual fall in employment, household incomes, employment, government income, and imports where the ACIL-Tasman study predicted increases. GDP was expected to double as a result of LNG/PNG in the ACIL-Tasman study, but the researchers found a mere 10% growth. The Jubilee study has been criticised because the researchers did not produce a credible counterargument: What would have happened in the absence of the PNG LNG project and to what extent are the observed effects related to PNG LNG?[20] Prime Minister Peter O’Neill rejected the Jubilee report and claimed low energy prices as the main factor.[21] ExxonMobil responded by mentioning the social and economic benefits of the project such as stimulating entrepreneurship and supporting local communities.[22]

Specific questions about the depreciation allowed and tax concessions were asked before the project began. Mekere Morauta challenged the exemption of GST and interest withholding tax given to LNG PNG in parliament. The exemption of interest withholding tax is important as the project is highly geared and much income is needed to service these loans. Arthur Somare, the relevant minister at the time, stressed that a 30 percent corporation tax on profit remained despite these concessions.[23] A second concern was raised by Aaron Batten while presenting a seminal report by the Asian Development Bank: "Papua New Guinea: Critical Development Constraints". He mentioned the taxation concessions to the LNG project. The Internal Revenue Commission argued that companies need the time to extract, produce, export, and sell their products before they can generate a continuous income that is taxable. However, the Internal Revenue gave no definite and precise information of income flows from LNG PNG. As a result of these concessions, substantial income was not expected until after 2020.[24] The actual arrangements between government and companies are in a secret Resource Development Agreement. However, Flanagan and Fletcher suggested that Exxon and Oil Search should be paying AUD$500,000 to the PNG government every year, since the gas started to flow in 2014. Instead, they are paying a fraction of this amount, partly because of their use of tax havens in the Netherlands and the Bahamas as they do in Australia.[25]

The local beneficiaries of the project have not received their dues on time. In 2009 before the start of the project there was a large meeting of local stakeholders in Kokopo: representatives of provincial and local government as well as representatives of local communities that made claims to be landowners in the area involved, which resulted in a written agreement on the sharing of benefits.[26] There have been regular announcements that benefits would be distributed, but these do not seem to have been followed up.[27][28][29] Landowners have threatened to shut down the projects. The most serious clash took place in Angore in 2017 and involved destruction of property.[30][31] In 2018, protesting landowners destroyed property again and demanded a payment of US$10million as a fee for maintaining security at the plant. Payments for that purpose were not foreseen in stakeholders agreements.[32] ExxonMobil as well as Oil Search insist that they have paid the amounts due to landowners; the problem is a question of distribution and not of payment.[33] A few days later, Oil Search claimed that journalists misinterpreted a message where its intent was not to blame the government.[34] ExxonMobil says that it has a good working relationship with the Mineral Resources Development Corporation which is in charge of looking after the interests of the landowners.[35] Some money was released to downstream landowners along the pipeline and in Boera village near the loading bay landowners near the pipeline. The government argued that identification is most difficult in the upstream areas, as most of the royalties appear to be locked in trust accounts. The amounts mentioned are around US$200,000,000.[36] The PNG government argues that the delay comes from landowner identification: identifying actual resident clans are more difficult than expected. O'Neill blamed the previous government as being the ones responsible for this issue's resolution.[37] However, it can be argued that such an identification is almost impossible when oral testimony is the only source available to identify descent and territory. There are calls for revisions to the Oil and Gas Act 2018 to resolve the problem as well as calls for revisions to the entire process.[38][39][40][41]

The income dependent on profit is unsatisfactory.[42] ExxonMobil claims to have paid US$1.4[clarification needed] in royalties, development levies, taxes, and dividends to the PNG government. They argue that after 2025-2027 the amounts paid will significantly increase. The project is primarily financed by loans, which would eventually be paid off; Income from corporation tax and income from equity would rise as a result.[43] Nevertheless, there is strong agreement that the PNG government has been outdone in negotiations with the companies, which inspired an important debate among politicians about the mining and taxation legislation.[44] Charles Able said: "We need to develop a mineral and petroleum regime where we take a smaller equity for free and a higher royalty rate, introduce domestic market obligation and local content. We need to understand why a large current account surplus (from mineral and petroleum exports) still leaves us with a foreign exchange shortage.”[45]

PAPUA LNG: the second LNG company in PNG

When the proposals for an LNG facility in PNG were denied there were two factions in the cabinet: one headed by Prime Minister Michael Somare, who advocated a partnership with Interoil to development of the Elk-Antelope gas field, and the other by his son Arthur Somare, who advocated a partnership with ExxonMobil/Oil Search to develop the Hides gas fields.[46] Somare's son won, but once PNG/LNG became operational, attention went to Interoil's Elk-Antelope Gas Field. The fields are located in a marshy area in the eastern margin of the Papuan Basin to the west of Port Moresby (90 km from the Gulf of Papua coast). [47][48] The size of the gas field is certified at about 6.5 trillion cubic feet, compared to the estimated 7.1 trillion cubic feet in Hides and associated fields.[49] While planning and implementation of the LNG PNG project did not encounter problems, the Elk-Antelope gas field project was mired in political and technical controversies.

Competition for control over the Elk-Antelope gas fields

Two relatively small oil and gas companies were major players in the Elk-Antelope gas field: Interoil and Oil Search. Interoil was a minor company in the gas and oil industry that acquired exploration licenses for oil and gas in PNG in 2005. The driving force in Interoil was its founder: Phil Mulacek, who announced in 2007 the discovery of a large gas field on the edge of the Gulf of Papua in the south of the country. "The InterOil Corporation, made the kind of announcement investors crave: explorations near the refinery had uncorked a vast pool of natural gas potentially larger than the United States' total residential consumption of the fossil fuel in 2005. The size of the discovery was so large, Phil E. Mulacek, InterOil's [sic] chairman and chief executive, informed an analyst, that simply controlling its output 'was sort of like trying to stop the Mississippi.'"[50] An agreement was made between Interoil and the PNG government to proceed towards exploitation on one condition: Interoil had to partner with a company that had experience the development and management of a gas field.[51] Shell and ExxonMobil were mentioned as possible partners when Interoil entered negotiations.[52] The investment bank Merrill Lynch was also involved.[53] However, at the end of 2012 Interoil did not manage to find a partner to reach a Final Investment Decision (FID) and were in danger of losing the licence.[54] A proposal suggested that the PNG government would become a 50 percent shareholder instead of taking the proposed equity of 22.3 percent .[55] It was denied because the government did not have the money and it would not solve the problem of expertise. The French multinational Total is a major company in the oil and gas industry and they filled the void by buying a 60 percent interest in the gasfield.[56] Oil Search Company entered negotiations around the same time. It was already a stakeholder in the LNG PNG project and it extended its interests by buying into the Elk-Antelope gas fields, and they bought the Pac LNG group that had a 22.8% stake in the gasfields[57] and paid about US$900 million for participation. The money was sourced from equity bought by the PNG government and financed from a loan from the Swiss bank UBS.[58] Oil Search contested Total's participation before a London court of arbitration. Oil Search claimed to have priority rights (pre-emptive rights) in buying into Interoil because of its acquisition of Pac LNG.[59] Total continued to be present in Papua-LNG but at a reduced rate of 40% instead of 60%.[60] Interoil remained with an interest of about 40% in the Elk-Antelope gas field. Oil Search made a bid for Interoil's remaining shares in the gas field for US$3 billion.[61] OilSearch had to concede to ExxonMobil: they offered US$2.2.billion for the remaining shares of Interoil in the gasfield.[62] However, Mulacek had been replaced by Michael Hession as CEO in 2013.[63] Nevertheless, Mulacek challenged the deal in courts and in the shareholders meeting, but was defeated in both instances.[64]

The pattern of fierce competition and shifting alliances resulted in the following shareholding and proposed structure for the project: Total is the largest shareholder of the Elk-Antelope fields with a 31.1% interest. The partners are ExxonMobil (28.3%) and Oil Search (17.7%). The plan assumed that construction is 70% debt financed.[65]

Oil Search had the management contract for the upstream facilities while ExxonMobil managed the gas liquefaction plant and loading bay. The latter facilities would be built at the same place near Port Moresby as installations serving LNG/PNG.[66]

The agreement contained an obligation to provide gas for domestic use (a reserved 5%) so that PNG is for 70 percent self-sufficient for electricity supply in 2030. The State and landowners are not obliged to pay for their equity (US$900 million) before revenues start coming in. Payment for the Interoil shares by ExxonMobil is partly deferred until the FID and first shipments are made. Interoil retains residual rights to income from the gasfield if it performs above certain expectations.[67] Pac-LNG has retained residual rights to income if the output is beyond a certain expectation.[68] Total deferred cash payments for equity to the date of the FID (US$230 million).[69]

Reactions to the Elk-Antelope field agreement

The Memorandum of Understanding between the PNG government and the companies involved in the Elk-Antelope field was announced at the end of the APEC conference in 2018. Its intent was to support PNG's international status,[70] and it was followed by an agreement in April 2019 to start the Front End Engineering Design process. The Final Investment Decision (FID) that makes construction possible is expected in 2020. Output is expected to flow in 2024.[71]

In 2011 the FID was expected in the same year.[72] In 2017 the first LNG exports were expected in either late 2020 or early 2021[73] The new dates are also speculative because the financial underpinning of the announced agreement is virtually absent. There is only a commitment of a small proportion of the necessary cash for construction. The cash paid for the gas field is for the shareholders of Interoil and is not working capital for Papua-LNG. Nothing has been built or constructed with that money: it is merely a sum paid in the expectation of predicted income, which contrasts with investing in a company that started from scratch. The project is expected to be financed from loans for 70%; where the loan capital would come from is undetermined.[74]

The agreement was also politically controversial. Authoritative voices had argued that the mistakes of LNG PNG should have been avoided. O’Neill agreed, though he also said that there should be an "environment for our development partners to maximise returns on their investment".[75] He was under pressure from a comment in the March Monetary Policy Statement from the Bank of Papua New Guinea, which urged the government to be less generous with tax concessions. The policies with respect of tax and natural resource projects had led to less availability of foreign exchange and had not strengthened tax revenues. In 2018, PNG had a strong positive balance on the current account, which should have led to an increase in foreign exchange that never happened.[76] Deputy Prime Minister Charles Abel criticised the benefits of natural resource projects for PNG.[77][78] Abel collaborated with Minister of Mining Fabian Pok on the government negotiating team for the Papua-LNG project. He was content about the agreement: "We made compromises, but he considered it a significant improvement over the PNG LNG project: this Agreement provides earlier, less risky flows to the State, reduces the States financing burden to buys its shares, and provides some gas for domestic use at a discounted and fixed price. There are strong provisions for third party access to infrastructure and national content.” [79]

However, the agreement was immediately controversial. Some of the initial criticism came from Hela province, the locus of LNG PNG where benefits should have appeared. Philip Undialu, Governor of Hela Province, submitted a long list of critical questions.[80] Minister of Finance James Marape, who was from Hela, resigned.[81] More MPs followed him and resigned from the governing party (PNC). Four out of five resigning MPs originated from resource-rich areas [82]

The analysis of Mekere Morauta

Former Prime Minister Mekere Morauta criticised three areas in the agreement: first, the agreement was created without the necessary and required consultation. Landowner groups have not been properly identified in the PNG LNG project after ten years of operation. The government claimed that the money was reserved for when the process of identification is complete, without clarifying where the money was. It was seen as a cardinal mistake in the PNG LNG project that this identification was not completed before the start of the project.Therefore, landowner groups should have been identified before the APDL (Application for a Petroleum Development Licence) was submitted. Abel defended it as the agreement is provisional;[83] there was no APDL at the time. None of the members of the SNT (State Negotiating Team) publicly broke ranks with government, but there were strong statements claiming that this team, as well as the Department of Petroleum, have been sidelined. Morauta distributed a letter from the Department of Energy to the Secretary of the Government, which demanded that a proper APDL be made with the necessary documentation about the field's size and its economic viability.[84] Total should have provided ten documents that were absent or deficient, but they did not follow up on requests. The necessary information for decision making was not there and the required procedure was not followed.[85]

Second, the tax arrangements are similar to the ones in LNG PNG. The State agreed with the ongoing operational and depreciation costs. Depreciation in the project was tied to the repayment of loans. Profitability was predicted to be low until the loans were repaid with interest. If the participating partners furnished the loan capital themselves they would have assured themselves of a steady income stream irrespective of profitability. The faster the depreciation the less profit would have been made. Tax on interest or dividends would not be withheld, which meant the companies could export their income to a destination where little or no tax was paid without any taxation by the PNG government. Two of the participating companies – Total and ExxonMobil – would also have a steady income stream from the management contract. The companies would also have been exempt from paying GST, import, duties, and taxes on project goods and consumables. The management of the project was virtually tax free which made the management contract more profitable. Morauta argues that nothing was learnt from the LNG PNG project and mentions two specific instances: first, there was no proper taxation for windfall profits and there was no mention of taxing the oil that came out of the well mixed with gas (condensate). The oil was sold to Oilsearch, which could have been seen as compensation for Oilsearch losing out on the management contract.[86][87]

The third area of criticism concerned the domestic gas obligations of the project. The domestic provision of gas was an option to 5% of the output in the agreement. The agreement was also in contravention to the National Energy Policy which demanded that 15% of all gas output was available for domestic use. The agreement mentions the only provision of gas for electricity supply ignores possible wider industrial use. Gas would also have been expensive as it would be indexed from a high base to the world market price while it is domestically supplied.[88]

Doubts over the field's value

At the time of the agreement's conclusion, doubts returned in regards to the field's value.[89] Interoil had always presented the Elk-Antelope gas field as their own original find. That is not true; there is an earlier explorative team in the area that found gas, but doubted whether the field was exploitable. A whistleblower in the Department of Energy has brought this in the open again at the time of signing the agreement.[90] According to the report, the field had five major problems: the gas was probably not as extensive as predicted, not easily extractable, high water content, low quality gas, required expensive treatment, and the field's geology is suspect.[91]

Government’s response

Fok, the Minister of Mining, replied to the Governor of Hela province, Philip Undialo, who had a concern about the gas agreement. He denied all accusations and considered them lies for political purposes. He stressed that none of the members of the State Negotiating Team had publicly spoken negatively about the agreement.[92]

Effects of the change of government

The agreement on the Elk-Antelope gas field became the core of political controversies about PNG’s policies with respect to natural resources. It led to O'Neill's resignation.[93] His successor, James Marape, announced changes in the management of PNG's natural resources in his maiden speech, though at the same time he was keen to reassure investors: “He did not intend to chase industry away, but asserting that reforms were needed to ensure benefits are spread more evenly.” [94] Oil Search's Peter Botten proclaimed immediately after Marape's appointment that it was likely that nothing would change and arrangements would remain the same when the third gas field Pn'yang came into production. Botten did not expect any significant new concessions on the dea,.[95] which led to a bristling reply from Marape, yet he remained vague as regards to envisioned changes.[96] Minister for Petroleum and Energy Kerenga Kua announced two months after the change of government that a revision of the “regulatory and commercial terms of the so called LNG agreement was ready for political approval”. The companies involved were unsympathetic to proposed changes. Total declared that no change in the agreement would be entertained. Oil Search warned that revisions may push back the FID to 2021 and projects elsewhere in the world may take precedence over Papua-LNG [97] Three government-backed lenders – Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), the US Overseas Private Investment Corp (OPIC) and Australia's Export Finance and Insurance Corp (EFIC) – announced an initial commitment to lend to Papua-LNG. [98] Kua negotiated with Total in Singapore in August 2019 to receive better terms, which resulted in a number of non-binding statements of intent. The Papua-LN project would proceed as planned. His most important statement was that in the future, contracts would be made on the basis of Production Sharing Agreements which would lead to early free cash flows in petroleum and mining contracts.[99]

The Pn'yang gas field

The Pn’yang gas field is the third project for PNG Gas. It is situated in the lowlands to the northwest of the Hides gas field. It was originally thought to be a relatively small gas field, but a certification exercise revised this as composing of 4.37 trillion cubic feet of gas.[100]For comparison, Hides is estimated to be at 7.1 trillion cubic feet and Elk-Antelope at 6.43 trillion cubic feet.[101] The development of this gas field would require relatively fewer expenses: the pipeline from Hides to the coast would only need to be extended inland. At the Caution Bay loading point it would need one extra train to condense the gas for shipping, which would mean building one extra train besides the two extra trains for the Elk-Antelope gas field. Synergies are expected.[102] ExxonMobil has been the main actor in this field but it is not the only participant. ExxonMobil as lead operator owned 49 percent, Oil Search held 38.5 percent, and JX Nippon of Japan held 12.5 percent interest. The Australian company Santos has bought into the project a 14.3 percent stake. Santos' acquisition saw current participant ExxonMobil's stake drop from 48.99 percent to 36.86 percent, Oil Search's from 38.51 percent to 36.86 percent and JX Nippon's from 12.50 percent to 11.96 percent.[103][104] However, the deal with Santos was contingent on the award of a product development licence and reaching a final investment decision.[105] Before the political changes, Oil Search was optimistic about the development of Pn’yang. They expected an agreement with the PNG government similar to the one with Papua LNG in the second quarter of 2019 and an FID in 2020 in conjunction with the FID for Papua-LNG.[106] It is unlikely that these deadlines will be met because of the political changes.

The Western Gas Project

The Western Gas Project is the fourth LNG development. The major operator is Horizon oil. The collaborating partners are Oil Search, Kumul, and the PNG state company.[107] The Chinese company Balang is a likely partner since it bought the interests of the Spanish company Repsol in PNG.[108] A considerable amount of condensate – oil that comes along with the gas – is expected in the project. That is of particular interest to OilSearch as the company is stabilising. It entails the construction of a processing (conditioning) plant at the wellheads, a separate pipe line to Daru, and the construction of a liquidification plant in Daru. The planning was to complete pre-FEED studies (concept engineering and design) in the second half of 2018. The deadline was not met and prospects have been affected by the political changes and landowner concerns.[109]

Equity participation finances

The projection of equity participation finances in LNG projects is a major issue in the politics surrounding LNG projects. The Mining Act in PNG allowed government participation to be involved to have a share of a maximum of 30 percent in natural resources projects; In the case of PNG LNG this was projected as a 19.4% share. About US$800 million was contributed to the construction of the project and the mining rights. This payment was to be made following the FID. A concurrent phase in the project was the front end engineering Design (FEED) which raised the project's cost, which required the share to be financed by equity. As a result, the PNG government had to find US$1 billion when the FID was made on 12 August 2008.[110] In early March 2009 the PNG government acquired the sum through a loan from IPIC (International Public Investment Corporation), a sovereign fund from the government of Abu Dhabi. It was not an ordinary loan, but an exchangeable bond. IPIC acquired the right to either be repaid in cash or through the security in the loan: PNG's equity in Oil Search Limited. These shares ideally would, at the time of redemption, equal at least the value of the loan which was designated at a share value of A$8.55. If the value of the shares was lower than the loan, the PNG government would have to pay out the missing cash. If the value of the shares was higher than the loan and IPIC wanted to buy the shares, the PNG government was entitled to the extra value in cash. The loan was expected to mature after five years, but IPIC could opt for a shorter period. The interest was 5%.[111][112] When the loan matured in 2014 the share price was around A$8.55 and IPIC wanted the shares as repayment for the loan. The PNG government sent a delegation to Abu Dhabi in an attempt to dissuade them and accept cash. They refused and the Oil Search shares were transferred from the PNG government to IPIC. The share price also fell back and PNG had to add US$70.8 million.[113] This financial construction was defended by Somare when the deal was concluded. He argued that the government did not want the loan to add to government indebtedness. It was fundamentally the sale of an asset – the Oil Search shares – in the first place. 2008 was also the year of the worldwide financial crisis which made it difficult to raise money.[114] “The exchangeable bond effectively involved a future swap in shares held in Oil Search for immediate funding for a direct equity stake in the LNG venture.” [115] The latter was expected to be much more profitable: The government also expected to raise more money from the equity participation in LNG-PNG than from Oil Search dividends. It was expected that the revenue stream from the LNG project would redeem the loan. Somare was the government minister in charge of public companies (IPBC) and the LNG project. Morauta challenged Somare when the IPIC loan concluded; he criticised Somare's position as minister in charge of IPBC and Somare's use of his position to monopolise negotiations about the loan. From the beginning, he criticised the mortgages of national assets (the government's shares in Oil Search).[116] Morauta became the minister of IPBC in 2011 and reiterated his criticisms: "A loan in which Treasury was not involved; a loan which never had NEC approval; a loan which was never tabled in Parliament. It was negotiated and signed behind closed doors by people with no experience in the complex world of international high finance." He criticised technicalities of the loan: "The loan was drawn half a year before it was needed for financing and this led to a loss of interest. Currency risk was not hedged either. The most fundamental criticism was that A longer running time of the loan could have resulted in financing it from the income stream of PNG/LNG. That was due to early maturing of the loan not realistic."[117]

The government of PNG lost its equity in Oil Search after the IPIC loan was redeemed and had exchanged it for equities in LNG PNG. O’Neill wanted to redress this situation with a new shareholder in Oil Search,[118] who was looking for fresh capital to buy a stake in the next LNG project: the Elk-Antelope gas field. They needed US$900 million to buy the share of Pac LNG group in that field. Oil Search issued new share capital to finance this acquisition. These shares were bought by the government of PNG and financed with a loan from the Australian branch of the UBS bank.[119] This loan was similar to the IPIC loan to finance shares in LNG PNG: the shares that PNG bought in Oil Search were security for the loan; it was a "collared loan", which implied hedging one's bets on the movement of share prices – the high and low were the collar – in order to guarantee a loan purchasing the shares.[120] The risks for the bank were reduced because the loan was to be serviced directly from an escrow account in Singapore where PNG's income from LNG PNG was paid. UBS had a first claim to the money,[121][122]

The finances were controversial since its inception and were similar to the debate around the IPIC loan. First, the loan concluded by bypassing the legally required channels and the little consultation that took place was careless. For example, the board of the State Petroleum organization was presented with a decision that they were expected to follow and concerns were ignored.[123] PNG's National Executive Council (NEC) was also confronted with a prepared statement. The treasurer, Don Polye, refused to sign and was fired as a result.[124] However, there were more ministers who opposed the decision.[125] The decision has probably passed in some form through the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance, but prominent PNG economists argued from its inception that “the UBS loan was sought outside of sound fiscal management laws and legal governance”.[126] This was confirmed by an Ombudsman Commission report that recommended a leadership tribunal for Marape and O'Neill. The Commission found fifteen breaches of procedure.[127] The most important breach may be that parliament was not asked to approve the loan as this was constitutionally required.[128]

Much of the loan was shrouded in mystery and there suspicions about parties benefiting themselves. The suspicions were warranted as there was a bridging loan of A$335 million covering the costs of acquiring the shares besides the substantive collared loan of A$904 million to cover the price of the Oil Search shares. [129] The Ombudsman Commission's report found that “it involved different contracts being signed between at least eight different parties including the PNG State, UBS AG, UBS Nominees Pty Ltd, UBS Securities Australia Limited, the National Petroleum Company of PNG (Kroton) Limited and its parent, the Independent Public Business Corporation, the Papua New Guinea Liquefied Natural Gas Global Company LDC and, finally, Oil Search Limited”.[130] The Commission of inquiry into the UBS loan would pay attention to the fees paid to brokers and negotiators.[131]

Third, the loan was supposed to be redeemed for a long time before one could expect revenues from the Elk-Antelope gas field to repay it. It was expected to be serviced from the income from PNG LNG. However, according to the treasury secretary Dirio Vele, the PNG government could only expect revenues to flow after 2020 when investment costs were recouped. The investment costs had to be settled out of depreciation charges to pay off the loans to the highly geared project.[132] The loan had to be repaid in 2016 and Morauta wondered how that had to be repaid.[133] Ultimately, the loan was repaid by the transfer of shares to Oil Search. The repayment was made at a loss: the government of PNG had bought these at A$8.20 and the price was A$6,70 at the time of redemption. When the deal concluded the PNG government expected the share price to double which would have resulted in a windfall for the PNG government. Kumul Petroleum Holdings, the state owned company that owned the shares estimated the loss at US$254 million.[134][135]

The policy debate

Income from natural resources in PNG projects were far below international standards, according to authoritative institutions (OESO, IMF and IETI).[136][137][138][139] It was thus understandable that renegotiation of the Papua/LNG agreement was a priority for the Marape government after coming to power. Kua reopened negotiations. However, the energy companies were only willing to grant minor concessions. Kua had to accept the terms of the Papua-LNG agreement, but he insisted that the agreement for the P’nyang gas field should offer considerably better terms: "In the P’nyang talks, the government appears to be seeking a better tax take, more local content and jobs opportunities, more project information from the operator, and a firm commitment to development of P’nyang in a defined timeframe.”[140] The energy companies were not willing to take that into consideration and talks broke down between government and the companies on 31 January 2020. [141] Prime Minister Marape sounded confident that progress on the Papua LNG project with lead developer ExxonMobil would continue. [142] Three new trains to convert natural gas into LNG were planned to treat the gas from Papua-LNG as well as from P’nyong. The energy companies wanted to only proceed with preliminary engineering and design for the expansion of its PNG LNG plan with new trains after a Petroleum Development Licence was given for the P’nyang field. [143] The result was a stalemate.

Landowner interests are a further complicating factor. An umbrella organisation of landowners groups covering the area of operation of Papua/LNG went to the courts in order to ask for a temporary injunction against the continuation of developing Papua-LNG. The court allowed the landowners to delay the issue of a Production Development Licence until a new agreement was negotiated and a new Petroleum and Gas Act was in place. Among the landowners' demands were production sharing and at least 50% PNG ownership.[144]

Policies did not reflect much on the attempts to gain equity in the projects. The PNG government has lost its shareholding in Oil Search and exchanged them in practice for a shareholding in LNG PNG. This exchange came at a substantial cost of contracting and servicing a loan and an additional payment. The government of PNG has not acquired a shareholding in Papua-LNG through Oil Search despite the cost of contracting and servicing a loan plus unknown extra payments. The energy companies benefited from a capital injection in PNG LNG through the government's shareholding. Oil Search has benefitted from a capital injection through the botched attempt to gain shares through the UBS loan. The agreement on Papua-LNG expected a shareholding of 22.25 percent in Papua LNG that is expected to be paid from the project's income. Ken Ail Kaepai of PNG University of Technology sketched the dilemma as follows: “Under this arrangement, the dividends will be delayed over more extended periods required for allowing the State to repay the equity capital sourced from external lending institutions or will enable the investor to recoup its equivalent equity capital cost internally using future positive cash flows from the project.”[145]

See also

References

  1. ^ PNG Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) project Available at: https://www.hydrocarbons-technology.com/projects/pnglng/ No date of posting. Accessed on: 25/02/2019
  2. ^ https://data.worldbank.org/country/papua-new-guinea Posted in 2019. Accessed on: 24/02/2019
  3. ^ Available at: http://www.worldstopexports.com/petroleum-gas-exports-country/ No date posting:. Accessed on: 25/02/2019
  4. ^ The history of the PNG-Queensland LNG pipeline Available at:https://www.pipeliner.com.au/2016/03/16/the-history-of-the-png-queensland-pipeline/ Posted on: 16/03/20 Accessed on: 3/03/2019
  5. ^ https://pnglng.com/About/History
  6. ^ https://pnglng.com/About/Co-venturers Available at: https://pnglng.com/About/Co-venturers Dated as: LNGPNG 2008-2019 Accessed on: 2/3/2019
  7. ^ Available at:PNG/LNG impact study: An assessment of the direct and indirect impacts of the proposed PNG/LNG project on the economy of PNG Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/118394202/Acil-Tasman-Impact-Study-Revision-01 Posted by:Shankar Jha in April 2009
  8. ^ Osami Tsukimori and Sonale Paul:: Exxon declares force majeure on exports from Papua New guinea source. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-papua-quake-exxon-mobil/exxon-declares-force-majeure-on-exports-from-papua-lng-project-source-idUSKCN1GE0GJ Posted on:2/03/2018 Accessed on; 3/03/2020
  9. ^ LNG published share participation in percentages but not in actual amounts of US$. However, the government of Papua New Guinea borrowed US$ 1.681 billion to buy a stake of 16.8%. Exxon Mobil's share is 33% and therefore will be roughly US$3.3 billion. “IPIC deal a major PNG government achievement” Available at: http://www.pngindustrynews.net/storyView.asp?storyID=9637514&section=Wantok&sectionsource=s14035&aspdsc=yes Posted on: 17/9/2012; “PNG LNG project overview” Available at: http://www.oilsearch.com/Our-Activities/PNG-LNG-Project.html Archived 2017-01-26 at the Wayback Machine Accessed on 4/11/2016.
  10. ^ “PNG LNG Project financing” Presentation at USEXIM annual conference 11/3/2010. Available at: http://www.exim.gov/sites/default/files/events/annual-conference-2010/PNGLNGProjectFinance.pdf Accessed on: 4/11/2016;”Project Finance for LNG Project in Papua New Guinea: Contributing to Stable Energy Resource Supply to Japan by Supporting Development of New LNG Supply Source” Available at: https://www.jbic.go.jp/en/information/press/press-2009/1216-7217 Posted on: 16/12/2009 Accessed on 4/11/2009
  11. ^ https://pnglng.com/About/Our-Operations Dated: 2008-2019 Accessed on 16/03/2018
  12. ^ Jaques Moss, Everything you need to know about Papua New Guinea massive lng project. Available at: https://knect365.com/energy/article/5891f3ed-db96-47c9-bc86-9c26eee9b91e/everything-you-need-to-know-about-papua-new-guineas-massive-lng-project. Posted on: 6/8/18 Accessed on: 18/3/2018
  13. ^ Dan Murtaugh, Jason Scott and Stephen Engle, Exon, Total eye Papua New Guinea expansion deal by March Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-16/exxon-total-eye-papua-new-guinea-lng-expansion-deal-by-march Posted on 16/11/2018
  14. ^ Jaques Moss, Everything you need to know about Papua New Guinea massive lng project. Available at https://knect365.com/energy/article/5891f3ed-db96-47c9-bc86-9c26eee9b91e/everything-you-need-to-know-about-papua-new-guineas-massive-lng-project. Posted on: 6/8/18 Accessed on: 18/3/2018
  15. ^ Exxon's PNG/LNG costs balloon to $ 19 billion Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-exxon-png/exxons-png-lng-project-costs-balloon-to-19-billion-idUSBRE8AA0GR20121112 Posted on: 12/11//2012 Accessed on 20/3/2011
  16. ^ Available at: https://pnglng.com/About/Project-overview Dated: 2008-2019. Accessed on 16/03/2018
  17. ^ Jonathan Barrett and tom Wetbrook, In Papua New guinea Exxon's giant lng project fuels frustration Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-papua-lng-exxon-mobil-insight/in-papua-new-guinea-exxons-giant-lng-project-fuels-frustration-idUSKCN1PA32M?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews Posted on: 17/1/2019 Accessed on: 13/3/2019
  18. ^ Dan Murtaugh, Jason Scott and Stephen Engle, Exon, Total eye Papua New Guinea expansion deal by March Available at:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-16/exxon-total-eye-papua-new-guinea-lng-expansion-deal-by-march
  19. ^ OilSearch: what we do; PNG/LNG project Available at: https://www.oilsearch.com/what-we-do/production/png-lng-project Dated :2017. Accessed on 20/3/2019
  20. ^ Mark McGillvray Modelling or Muddling? Economic analysis of the LNG/PNG project. Available at: http://www.devpolicy.org/economic-analysis-of-the-png-lng-project-20180607/ Posted on 6/6/2018 Accessed on: 21/3/2019
  21. ^ Liam Fox: Papua New Guinea's Prime Minister rejects LNG report he hadn't read as 'fake news' Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-01/png-pm-rejects-lng-report/9716208 Posted: 1/5/2018 Accessed on: 13/3/2019
  22. ^ Exxon defends economic impact of png gas project Available at: https://www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/356376/exxon-defends-economic-impact-of-png-gas-project Posted 1/4/2018 Accessed on 13/3/1019
  23. ^ More powers for IPBC Available at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/more-powers-for-ipbc/ Posted on: 5/3/2010 Accessed: 12/3/2019
  24. ^ (Tax holidays worrisome” The National 6/8/2012 p.38 Also available at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/tax-holidays-worrisome/ Posted at 6/8/2012 Accessed on: 21/3/2019 Patrick Saniwa Sakal and Gynnie Kero, “IRC Exec defends tax holidays” The National 8/8/2012 Also available at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/irc-exec-defends-tax-holidays/ Posted on: 7/8/2012 Accessed on: 21/3/2019See also: “LNG revenue to flow in 2020: Vele” by Gedeon Timothy The National 4/10/2016 Available at: http://www.thenational.com.pg/lng-revenue-flow-2020-vele/ Accessed on: 4/11/2016
  25. ^ Paul Flannigan and Luke Fletcher, (2018) Double or Nothing,, the broken promises of PNG/LNG Available at: https://www.jubileeaustralia.org/latest-news/new-jubilee-report-shows-that-efic-funded-png-lng-project-has-hurt-png Posted on: 29/4/2018 Accessed on: 21/3/201 Pp. 31-34 Accessed on 13/3/2019
  26. ^ PNG LNG Benefits sharing agreement. Available at: http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2016/11/PNG-Landowners-LNG-Project-Companies-2008-agreement.pdf
  27. ^ Papua New Guinea starts to paying landowners royalties Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/papua-lng-royalties/papua-new-guinea-starts-paying-landowners-lng-royalties-idUSL4N1LU2MQ Posted on: 13/9/2017 Accessed on 13/3/2019
  28. ^ Freddy Mou, Frustrated PNG gas supply landowners protest over non-payment of royalties Available at: https://asiapacificreport.nz/2017/02/20/frustrated-png-gas-landowners-protest-over-non-payment-of-royalties/ Posted on 20/2/2017
  29. ^ Lucy E.J. Woods, Deal in sight for PNG landowners protesting Exxon led gas project Available at: https://news.mongabay.com/2018/08/deal-in-sight-for-png-landowners-protesting-exxon-led-gas-project/ Posted on 31/8/2018
  30. ^ Eric Tiozek and Barbara Hnniman: PNG landowners block access to wells over royalties dispute Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-29/png-landowners-seize-gas-wells-over-royalty-disputes/9206828 Posted at 29/11/2017 Accessed on: 13/3/2019
  31. ^ Eric Tiozek Exxon Mobil investigating reported vandalism on gas pipe project in Papua New guineaAvailable at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-exxon-mobil-papua/exxonmobil-investigating-reported-vandalism-on-gas-pipe-project-in-papua-new-guinea-idUSKBN1JF06G Posted on:19/6/2018 Accessed on 13/3/2019
  32. ^ Angore wellhead committee to provide security Available at: https://postcourier.com.pg/angore-wellhead-leadership-committee-provide-security/ Posted on 21/62018
  33. ^ Cole Latimer, Oil search blames PNG government for slow payments, https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/oil-search-blames-png-government-for-slow-payments-20180511-p4zers.html. Posted on:12/5/ 2018 Accessed 13/3/2019
  34. ^ (9) Ruth Waram, Communications manager Oil search working with government on PNG-LNG landowners Available at: https://www.oilsearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/21388/Oil-Search-working-with-Govt-on-PNG-LNG-benefits-for-landowners-150518.pdf Posted on 15/5/2018 Accessed on: 13/3/2019
  35. ^ Speech to 2018 Chamber of Mines and Petroleum Conference by Andrew Barry, Managing Director, ExxonMobil PNG Limited Available at: https://pnglng.com/Newsroom/Speeches/Why-are-we-here Posted on 3/12/2018 Accessed on: 2/3/2019
  36. ^ Kevin Teme, PNG LNG Pipeline Landowners to receive Benefits MRDC Available at: https://postcourier.com.pg/png-lng-pipeline-landowners-receive-benefits-mrdc/ Posted on: 25.10/2018 Accessed on 13/3/2019
  37. ^ John Barrett, Tom Westbrook, In Papua New Guinea Exxon's giant lng project fuels frustration https://www.reuters.com/article/us-papua-lng-exxon-mobil-insight/in-papua-new-guinea-exxons-giant-lng-project-fuels-frustration-idUSKCN1PA32M Posted on 17/1/2019
  38. ^ Meriba Tulo, Peter O’Neill Government to ensure better deal for the communities Available at: 5/12/ 2018 https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2018/12/05/peter-oneill-government-to-ensure-better-deal-for-communities/ Posted on: 5/12/2018 Accessed on 13/3/2019
  39. ^ Sam Koim and Stephen Howes, Why do pnglng landowner royaltiestake so long Available AT http://www.devpolicy.org/png-lng-landowner-royalties-long-20161216/ Posted on 16/12/2016 Accessed on: 13/3/2019
  40. ^ Colin Filer, Rethinking the landowner problem in the pnglng project http://www.devpolicy.org/revisiting-the-landowner-problem-in-the-png-lng-project-20190213/ Posted on: 13/2/2019 Accessed: 13/3/2019
  41. ^ Peter Dwyer, Monica Minnegal, Landowner Identification in PNG: a job for the government, Available at: http://www.devpolicy.org/landowner-identification-in-png-20190321/#comment-685305 Posted on:21/3/2019 Accessed 13/3/2019 Accessed on: 13/3/2019
  42. ^ John Barrett, Tom Westbrook, In Papua New Guinea exxons giant lng project fuels frustration Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-papua-lng-exxon-mobil-insight/in-papua-new-guinea-exxons-giant-lng-project-fuels-frustration-idUSKCN1PA32M Posted on 17/1/2019
  43. ^ Speech to 2018 Chamber of Mines and Petroleum Conference by Andrew Barry, Managing Director, ExxonMobil PNG Limited Available at: https://pnglng.com/Newsroom/Speeches/Why-are-we-here Posted on 3/12/2018 Accessed on: 13/3/2019
  44. ^ Henzy Yakham, Reform PNGs ownership laws Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/tag/mekere-morauta/ Posted on: 12/9/2018
  45. ^ Luke Fletcher and Paul Flanagan, Double or nothing. The broken economic promises of PNGLNG p. Available at: https://www.jubileeaustralia.org/latest-news/new-jubilee-report-shows-that-efic-funded-png-lng-project-has-hurt-png p.32
  46. ^ Rowan Callick and Asia-Pacific Editor, Michael Somare loses to son Arthur on gas tactics. Available at: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/michael-somare-loses-to-son-arthur-on-gas-tactics/news-story/693c2090d0e7a98f5e28089b0dafed96 Posted at: 5/09/2009
  47. ^ Asset report: Elk Antelope. Available at: https://www.woodmac.com/reports/upstream-oil-and-gas-elkantelope-papua-lng-7206092 Posted at: 11/10/2019
  48. ^ Total sign gas agreement for Papua-LNG project. Available at: http://www.energyglobalnews.com/total-sign-papua-lng-project-gas-agreement/ Posted at: 20/11/2018
  49. ^ Oil Search: Certification Elk-Antelope gas field completed. Available at https://www.lngworldnews.com/oil-search-elk-antelope-gas-certification-completed/ Posted at: 15/07/2015
  50. ^ Charles Duhig, Big game, an Enron survivor hunts for riches. Posted on: 21/1/2007 Accessed on: 13/05/2019
  51. ^ "InterOil Confirms Continuity of the Antelope Reef Reservoir and Extends LNG Agreements". Posted on: 8/01/2013 Accessed on: 8/05/2019
  52. ^ Shell and ExxonMobil head to head in Papua New Guinea: Shell and ExxonMobil court InterOil for new LNG project Available at: https://www.2b1stconsulting.com/shell-and-exxonmobil-head-to-head-in-papua-new-guinea/ Posted on: 30/09/2013 Accessed on: 7/05/2019
  53. ^ Merrill Lynch Commodities, Pacific LNG and InterOil Sign Shareholder Agreement.for LNG Project, Available at: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20070731006271/en/Merrill-Lynch-Commodities-Pacific-LNG-InterOil-Sign Posted on: 31/7/2007 Accessed on: 7/05//2019
  54. ^ InterOil confident $6 billion PNG gas project can be saved Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-interoil-idUSBRE84D0FO20120514 Posted on: 14/05/2012 Accessed on 8/05/2012
  55. ^ ) Oxford Business Group, The report: Papua New Guinea 2013. p.. 97 Available at: https://books.google.nl/books?id=npq82RA8ouYC&pg=PA97&lpg=PA97&dq=government+participation+50%25+Elk+Antelope&source=bl&ots=3TbGha_iyZ&sig=ACfU3U0--JMEqP-pduUOHy_-W8ELAlMTnw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjgoKTj24viAhVRIMUKHU0rAJo4ChDoATAAegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=government%20participation%2050%25%20Elk%20Antelope&f=false Accessed on: 8/05/2019
  56. ^ Total and InterOil Close Elk-Antelope Transaction Available at: https://www.total.com/en/media/news/press-releases/total-et-interoil-finalisent-la-transaction-elk-antelope Posted on: 26/3/2014 Accessed on: 7/05/2017
  57. ^ Oil Search pounces on Elk-Antelope Available at: https://pngresourcesonline.com/oil-search-pounces-on-elk-antelope/ Posted on: 3/7/2014 Accessed on: 7/05/2019
  58. ^ Elk/Antelope gas fields: what’s really going on? https://www.businessadvantagepng.com/elkantelope-gas-fields-whats-really-going/ Posted on: 5/03/2014 Accessed on: 7/05/2019
  59. ^ Arbitration to determine future of Papua New Guinea’s second gas project Available at: https://www.businessadvantagepng.com/arbitration-determine-future-papua-new-guineas-second-gas-project/ Posted on: 26/11/2014 Accessed on: 8/05/2019
  60. ^ InterOil win clears way for Total’s participation in Papua New Guinea’s Elk/Antelope gas project Available at: https://www.businessadvantagepng.com/interoil-win-clears-way-totals-participation-papua-new-guineas-elkantelope-gas-project/ Posted on: 11/2/2015 Accessed on: 11/2/2019
  61. ^ Brian Robins, Oil Search makes $3b bid for PNG rival InterOil Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/oil-search-makes-3b-bid-for-png-rival-interoil-20160520-gozh9r.html Posted on: 20/5/2016 Accessed on: 8/5/2019
  62. ^ Oil Search bows to ExxonMobil in battle for InterOil Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-interoil-m-a-oil-search-idUSKCN10101R Accessed on: 8/5/2019 Posted on 21/07/2016 Accessed on: 8/5/2019
  63. ^ InterOil Corporation Announces The Retirement Of Phil Mulacek From The Board And The Appointment Of Dr. Michael Hession Available at: https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/interoil-corporation-announces-the-retirement-of-phil-mulacek-from-the-board-and-the-appointment-of-dr-michael-hession-513254571.html Posted on: 18/11/2013 Accessed on: 8/5/2019
  64. ^ ) InterOil shareholders approve revised takeover proposal Available at: https://www.businessadvantagepng.com/interoil-shareholders-approve-revised-takeover-proposal/ Posted on: 15/2/2017. Accessed on: 8/5/2019
  65. ^ ) Sonali Paul, Total, partners reach initial agreement on $13 billion Papua LNG project Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-papua-total-lng/total-partners-reach-initial-agreement-on-13-billion-papua-lng-project-idUSKCN1RL085 Posted on: 9/4/2019 Accessed on: 12/5/2019
  66. ^ Rick Wilkinson, Papua New Guinea Government, partners sign LNG agreement Available at: https://www.ogj.com/articles/2019/04/papua-new-guinea-government-partners-sign-lng-agreement.html Posted on: 4/9/2019 Accessed on: 12/5/2019
  67. ^ Interoil Total finalize Elk-Antelope deal. Available at: https://www.lngworldnews.com/interoil-total-finalize-elk-antelope-deal/ Posted on: 26/3/2019 Accessed on: 12/5/2019
  68. ^ PNG Oil Search to buy Pac LNG Available at: https://www.lngworldnews.com/png-oil-search-to-buy-pac-lng/ Posted on: 27/2/2014
  69. ^ Oil Search and Total sign agreement regarding acquisition of InterOil assets in Papua New Guinea Available at: https://www.total.com/en/media/news/press-releases/oil-search-and-total-sign-agreement-regarding-acquisition-interoil-assets-papua-new-guinea Posted on: 20/5/2016
  70. ^ Rick Wilkinson, Papua LNG group signs MOU with Papua New Guinea in Oil and Gas Journal | 16 November 2018 Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2018/11/19/papua-lng-group-signs-mou-with-papua-new-guinea/ Posted on 18/11/2018 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  71. ^ Oil Search, Total, Exxon sign long-awaited gas deal with PNG, Reuters 9/4/2019 Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2019/04/10/oil-search-total-exxon-sign-long-awaited-gas-deal-with-png/#comments Posted on: 10/4/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  72. ^ PNG govt makes FLNG flash Available at: https://www.pngreport.com/png/news/1103053/png-govt-makes-flng-splash Posted on: 4/11/2011 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  73. ^ (4) Development in Energy sector to boost PNG’s economy from The Report 2017 Available at: https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/growth-driver-despite-setbacks-ongoing-developments-provide-boost-sector-and-economy No exact date of posting Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  74. ^ Sonali Paul, Total, partners reach initial agreement on $13 billion Papua LNG project Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-papua-total-lng/total-partners-reach-initial-agreement-on-13-billion-papua-lng-project-idUSKCN1RL085 Posted on: 9/4/2019 Accessed on: 12/5/2019
  75. ^ Melisha Yafoi, Papua Gas Agreement Date Set from Post Courier 19/3/2019 Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2019/03/20/papua-gas-agreement-date-set/ Posted on: 19/3/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  76. ^ David James, Bank of Papua New Guinea urges a tougher stance on new resources projects from Business Advantage 10/42019 Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2019/04/11/bank-of-papua-new-guinea-urges-tougher-stance-on-new-resources-projects/ Posted on: 20/4/2019. Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  77. ^ Abel wants mines to pay more in the National 17/7/2018 Available at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/abel-wants-mines-to-pay-more/ Posted on: 17/7/2018 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  78. ^ Isaac Nicolas, PNG LNG benefits are below average Available at: https://postcourier.com.pg/png-lng-benefits-average/ Posted on: 2/5//2018 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  79. ^ Gynnie Kero, LNG project expected to deliver K66 billion Available at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/lng-project-expected-to-deliver-k66-billion/ Posted on 10/4/2018 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  80. ^ (11) Philip Undialu MP, Papua LNG: An Open Letter to Dr Fabian Pok by Hela Governor Philip Undialu from: PNG Blogs 16,4/2019 Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2019/04/17/an-open-letter-to-dr-fabian-pok-by-hela-governor-philip-undialu/#comments Posted on:17/4/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  81. ^ (12) Sonali Paul and Tom Westbrook, Papua New Guinea finance minister steps down after LNG deal Available at: https://uk.reuters.com/article/papua-lng-minister/papua-new-guinea-finance-minister-steps-down-after-lng-deal-idUKL8N21T1X4 Posted on: 11/4/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  82. ^ (Staff reporter, Papua-LNG blamed for resignations, Available at: https://www.pngreport.com/government/news/1361706/papua-lng-blamed-for-resignations Posted on: 22/5/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  83. ^ (Johnny Blades, Radio New Zealand 16/4/2018 Grass Project Pressure rising for PNG government. Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2019/04/17/gas-project-pressure-rising-for-pngs-government/ Posted on: 16/4/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  84. ^ (Lohial Nuau,, Acting Secretary Directo oil and gas act to Amb. Isaac Lupari, CBE, Chief Secretary to the Government Papua New Guinea Available at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/y36rhbw2by0qu1y/20190327%20Letter%20from%20DPE%20to%20Chief%20Sec%20re%20PapLNG%20GA%20signing.pdf?dl= Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  85. ^ PM Must come clean on Papua-LNG. Public Statatement by Sir Mekere Morauta KCMG Available at: https://www.mekeremorauta.net/single-post/2019/04/28/PM-must-come-clean-on-Papua-LNG Posted on: 28/4/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  86. ^ PM Must come clean on Papua-LNG. Public Statement by Sir Mekere Morauta KCMG Available at: https://www.mekeremorauta.net/single-post/2019/04/28/PM-must-come-clean-on-Papua-LNG Posted on: 28/4/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  87. ^ (O’Neill gives away billions of kina through huge Papua LNG concessions, Public Statement by Sir Mekere Morauta KCMG Available at: https://www.mekeremorauta.net/single-post/2019/04/30/O’Neill-gives-away-billions-of-kina-through-huge-Papua-LNG-concessions Posted on: April 30, 2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  88. ^ More deficiencies of O’Neill’s Papua LNG Agreement Public Statement by Sir Mekere Morauta KCMG https://www.mekeremorauta.net/single-post/2019/05/02/More-deficiencies-of-O’Neill’s-Papua-LNG-Agreement Posted on May 2, 2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  89. ^ Keith Jackson, Is the new Papua-LNG project all that it appears? Available at: https://asopa.typepad.com/asopa_people/2019/04/is-the-new-papua-lng-project-all-that-it-appears.html Posted on: 13/4/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  90. ^ (20) Henry Blodget InterOil (IOC): "Major Momentum" Or Just A Castle In The Air? (A New Investigation) Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/interoil-ioc-major-momentum-or-just-a-castle-in-the-air-a-new-investigation-2010-4?international=true&r=US&IR=T Posted on: 1/4/2010 Accessed on: 18/5/201
  91. ^ Henry BlodgeApr. 1, 2010, 1:2Doubt expressed about value and viability of Elk-Antelope gasfield Public Statement by Sir Mekere Morauta KCMG Available at: https://www.mekeremorauta.net/single-post/2019/05/05/Doubt-expressed-about-value-and-viability-of-Elk-Antelope-gasfield Posted on: May 5, 2019 Accessed on: 18/5/201
  92. ^ Dr. Fabian Pok response to Hon. Philip Undialu's concern on Gas Agreement (PNG LNG project) Available at: http://kaulga.blogspot.com/2019/04/dr-fabian-pok-response-to-hon-philip.html Posted on: 15/04/2019 Accessed on: 18/5/2019
  93. ^ ) Papua New Guinea prime minister resigns Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/05/papua-guinea-prime-minister-peter-resigns-190526144032925.html Posted on 20/5/2019 Accessed: 9/08/2019
  94. ^ Jamie Tahana, Marape promises to rebuild the country in first address to PNG. Available at: https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/391374/marape-promises-to-rebuild-country-in-first-address-to-png Posted on: 6/06/2019 Accessed: 9/08/2019
  95. ^ Jonathan Barrett, Oil search CEO says new leader unlikely to demand big concessions on gas deal Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-papua-politics-oil-search/oil-search-ceo-says-new-png-leader-unlikely-to-demand-big-concessions-on-gas-deals-idUSKCN1T70VE Posted on:6/06/2019 Accessed: 9/08/2019
  96. ^ Johnny Blades-Radio New Zealand. New PNG govt’s resources stand in the spotlight Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2019/06/page/4/ Posted on: 13/06/2019 Accessed: 9/08/2019
  97. ^ Stephen Stapczynsk – Bloomberg, Total’s PNG plan faces fresh test as Del changes are proposed Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-25/total-s-papua-gas-deal-probe-complete-changes-to-be-recommended Posted: 25/07/2019 Accessed: 9/08/2019
  98. ^ Stephen Stapczynsk – Bloomberg, Total’s PNG plan faced a fresh test as changes were proposed in the agreement made. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-25/total-s-papua-gas-deal-probe-complete-changes-to-be-recommended Posted: 25/07/2019 Accessed: 9/08/2019
  99. ^ PNG US13 billion gas deal to go ahead. Available at:https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/398109/png-us13-billion-gas-deal-to-go-ahead Posted on:4/9/2019 Accessed on: 4/09/2019
  100. ^ Exxonmobil reports 84 percent increase in Pn’yang resource potential expansion Available at https://www.worldoil.com/news/2018/4/12/exxonmobil-reports-84-increase-in-p-nyang-resource-potential-expansion-in-png Posted on:4/12/2018 Accessed on: 15/08/2019
  101. ^ Oil Search Elk Antelope certification completed. Available at: https://www.lngworldnews.com/oil-search-elk-antelope-gas-certification-completed/ Posted on: 15/07/2016 Accessed on: 15/08/2019
  102. ^ Companies report increase in P’nyang gas Available at: https://www.ogj.com/general-interest/companies/article/17297370/companies-report-increase-in-pnyang gas-resources resources Posted on: 12/04/2018 Accessed on: 15/08/2019
  103. ^ Nathan Richardson, Australia’s Santos buys into PNG LNGs expansion projects upstream supply Available at: https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/natural-gas/051619-australias-santos-buys-into-png-lng-expansion-projects-upstream-supply Posted on:16/05/2019 Accessed on: 15/08/2019
  104. ^ Ambar Worrick and Tim Westbrook, .Santos buys into Exxon-led PNG gas field amid political ructions Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-santos-deals-png/santos-buys-into-exxon-led-png-gas-field-amid-political-ructions-idUSKCN1SM00H Posted on: 16/05/2019 2019 Accessed on: 15/08/2019
  105. ^ Mathew V. Viazey, PNG LNG expansion gains momentum Available at: https://www.rigzone.com/news/png_lng_expansion_gains_momentum-16-may-2019-158851-article/ Posted on: 16/05/2019 Accessed on: 15/08/2019
  106. ^ Oil Search outlines Papua LNG terms of agreement Available at: https://postcourier.com.pg/oil-search-outlines-papua-lng-terms-agreements/ Posted on: 16/04/2019 Accessed on: 25/08/2019
  107. ^ Horizon oil: western LNG project Available at: https://horizonoil.com.au/projects-operations/papua-new-guinea/western-lng-project/ Date of posting not mentioned Accessed on:15/08/2019
  108. ^ Rick Wilkinson, China extends gas interests in Papua New Guinea from Oil and Gas journal 21/06/2018 Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2018/06/22/china-extends-gas-interests-in-papua-new-guinea/ Posted on 22/06/2018
  109. ^ (2) Rick Wilkinson, China extends gas interests in Papua New Guinea from Oil and Gas journal 21/06/2018 Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2018/06/22/china-extends-gas-interests-in-papua-new-guinea/ Posted on 22/06/2018
  110. ^ The Kramer Report: Real story behind the IPIC deal Part 4. Available at: https://m.facebook.com/kramerreportpng/posts/928667137269593 No date posted. Accessed on: 21/10/2019
  111. ^ Abu Dhabi takes A$1.68 bln stake in Oil Search Available at: https://uk.reuters.com/article/ipic-oilsearch/abu-dhabi-takes-a1-68-bln-stake-in-oil-search-idUKLP66446820081125 Posted on:25/11/2008 Accessed on 21/10/2019
  112. ^ n Diamant, press release: Oil Search, IPEC exchangeable bond agreement 16/3/2009 Available at: https://www.oilsearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/4081/090316-IPIC-secures-strategic-investment-in-Oil-Search-Limited-c49f2828-a8bd-42c6-8ca9-9a123b638ea3.pdf Accessed on 21/10/2019
  113. ^ (PNG seeks Oil Search buyback from Abu Dhabi's IPIC : From: The Australian Available at: http://www.pina.com.fj/?p=pacnews&m=read&o=1518488381530ab926c7fcfb803892 Posted on:24/02/2014 Accessed on: 21/10/2019
  114. ^ Sir Michael: IPIC a win-win deal for PNG from Post Courier Available at: http://www.pina.com.fj/?p=pacnews&m=read&o=13596272605357130d9077c6b5499a Posted on: 23/04/2024 Accessed on: 21/10/2019
  115. ^ IPIC deal a major government achievement Available at: https://www.pngreport.com/print_article/pngindustrynews/news/1107636/ipic-deal-a-major-png-government-achievement?print=true Posted on: 17/09/2012 Accessed on: 21/10/2019
  116. ^ Eve Marshall, PNG criticized over massive lng project loan. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2008-11-07/png-criticised-over-massive-lng-project-loan/198216 Posted on: 7/11/2008 Accessed on: 21/10/2019
  117. ^ Malumnalu, Arthur Somare’s shameful legacy. Available at: https://malumnalu.blogspot.com/2011/11/1024x768-normal-0-false-false-false-en.html Posted ON: 27/11/2011 Accessed on: 21/10/2019
  118. ^ Isaac Nicholas, Prime Minister explains the necessity of the UBS loan Available at: https://postcourier.com.pg/prime-minister-explains-necessity-ubs-loan/ Posted on 8/05/2019 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  119. ^ Oil Search to acquire interest in PRL 15 (Elk/Antelope), providing core strategic position in future LNG developments in PNG Available at: https://www.oilsearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/4195/140227-Acquisition-of-interest-in-PRL-15-c14908c4-8d9c-4b15-81d6-80dd5ca6222f-0.pdf Posted on: 27/02/2014 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  120. ^ John Garnaut, How Oil Search deal found trouble in Papua New Guinea Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/business/how-oil-search-deal-found-trouble-in-papua-20151008-gk43wn.html Posted on: 10/10/2015 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  121. ^ Liam Cochrane, PNG LNG Project: How to share revenue of ExxonMobil PNG exports remains controversial Available at:: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-22/png-gas-gamble-as-the-lng-starts-to-flow/5471230 Posted on: 22/10/2015 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  122. ^ Polye: Investigate LNG money Available at: https://postcourier.com.pg/polye-investigate-lng-money/ Posted on: 24/12/2015 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  123. ^ John Garnaut, How Oil Search deal found trouble in Papua New Guinea Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/business/how-oil-search-deal-found-trouble-in-papua-20151008-gk43wn.html Posted on: 10/10/2015 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  124. ^ (Liam Cochrane, PNG Prime Minister O'Neill sacks treasurer for causing instability Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-11/an-png-pm-sacks-treasurer-polye/5311526 Posted on: 10/3/2014 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  125. ^ Daniel Komboni, don Polye’s stand against O’Neill’s excess nears vindication https://www.pngattitude.com/2019/05/don-polyes-stand-against-oneills-excesses-awaits-its-vindication.html Posted on 27th of May 2019 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  126. ^ ( Charles Yala,, Osborne Sanida, Andrew Nakahttps, The Oil Search loan; implications for PNG Available at: devpolicy.org/the-oil-search-loan-implications-for-png-20140321-2/ Posted on: 11/03/2014 Accessed on: 10/11/201
  127. ^ (Angus Grigg, Jonathan Shapiro and Liz Murray, UBS loan to the government may have breached 15 laws Available at: https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/ubs-loan-to-png-government-may-have-breached-15-laws-20190515-p51nls Posted on: 16/5/2019
  128. ^ UBS loan report tables in parliament Available at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/ocs-ubs-loan-report-tabled-in-parliament/ Posted on:27/6/2019 Accessed on: 10/11/201 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  129. ^ Government insider: demystifying the UBS loan Available at: https://www.facebook.com/PNGInFocus/posts/demystifying-the-ubs-loanby-government-insiderubs-loan-has-been-in-the-center-of/1774302216116928/ Posted on 10/7/2015 Accessed on: 10/11/2019
  130. ^ (Staff reporter, UBS, Oil Search and the forgotten middleman Available at: http://pngicentral.org/reports/ubs-oil-search-and-the-forgotten-middle-men Posted on:17/7/2019 Accessed on:: 10/11/2019
  131. ^ (Cost of UBS loan likely to triple says INJAAvailable at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/cost-of-ubs-loan-inquiry-likely-to-triple-says-injia/
  132. ^ LNG revenue to flow in 2020 Vele Available at: http://www.thenational.com.pg/lng-revenue-flow-2020-vele/ Posted on 4/10/2016 Accessed on: 16/12/19
  133. ^ Mekere Morauta: PM told to come clean on UBS loan Available at: https://www.mekeremorauta.net/single-post/2015/10/12/PM-told-to-come-clean-on-UBS-loan-1 Posted on: 12/10/2015
  134. ^ Eric Tiozek, PNG sells Oil Search stake after deal leaves government massively out of pocket Available at https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-22/png-government-sells-stake-in-oil-search/8976648 Posted on 22/9/2019 Accessed on: 14/12/2019
  135. ^ Prime Minister’s illegal Oil Search costs the nation hundreds of millions kina Available at: https://www.mekeremorauta.net/single-post/2017/09/22/Prime-Minister’s-illegal-Oil-Search-deal-costs-the-nation-hundreds-of-millions-of-kina Posted on: 22/9/2017 Accessed on: 14/12/2019
  136. ^ PNG Beyond the Boom; Economic Update by Oxford Business Group. In the National, Monday 23rd April 2012 Available at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/png-beyond-the-boom/ Posted on: 23/04/2012 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
  137. ^ Public information notice 12/53; IMF Executive Board concludes 2012 Qrticle IV consultation with Papua New Guinea Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pn/2012/pn1253.htm?id=180789 Posted on: 1/06/2012 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
  138. ^ Expert mine not giving enough, The National 23/12/2019 Available at: https://www.thenational.com.pg/expert-mine-not-giving-enough/ Posted on 23/12/2019 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
  139. ^ Official: Minerals not yielding for PNG from The National aka The loggers times 13/01/2020 Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2020/01/page/2/ Posted on: 15/01/2019 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
  140. ^ Credit Suisse analyst Saul Kavonic quoted in: Craig Guthrey, Pressure rises in PNG gas stand off from Petroleum Economist 22/01/2019 (?) Available at: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2020/01/page/1/ Posted on: 24/01/2020; https://www.petroleum-economist.com/articles/midstream-downstream/lng/2020/pressure-rises-in-png-gas-standoff Posted on: 22/01/2020 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
  141. ^ Papua New Guinea scraps talks with Exxon on P'nyang gas project Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-papua-exxon-mobil/papua-new-guinea-scraps-talks-with-exxon-on-pnyang-gas-project-idUSKBN1ZU1AQ Posted on: 31/01/2020 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
  142. ^ (7) Paul Chai, Prime Minister Marape confident of a five train lng future in Papua New guinea. Available at: https://www.businessadvantagepng.com/prime-minister-marape-confident-of-a-five-train-lng-future-in-papua-new-guinea/ Posted on: 31/01/2020 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
  143. ^ Angela Macdonald Smith,Oil Search’s LNG expansion under strain as Exxon rejects PNG’s terms from Australian Financial Review 22/11/2019. Available at: https://www.afr.com/companies/energy/oil-search-lng-expansion-in-peril-as-exxon-rejects-png-s-terms-20191122-p53d5w Posted on: 22/11/2019
  144. ^ Papua LNG put on hold Post Courier 27/11/2019 Available at: https://postcourier.com.pg/papua-lng-put-on-hold/ Posted on: 27/11/2019; Also available on: https://ramumine.wordpress.com/2019/11/27/papua-lng-put-on-hold-by-landowners-court-action/ Posted on: 27/11/2019 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
  145. ^ Academic urges government to revisit tax regime Available at: https://postcourier.com.pg/academic-urges-govt-revisit-tax-regime/ Posted 28/05/2019 Accessed on: 2/02/2020
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_gas_in_Papua_New_Guinea&oldid=967243052"