Jump to content

EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amigao (talk | contribs) at 20:36, 8 August 2020 (clean up, typo(s) fixed: Council → council (2), ’s → 's). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Mechanism is a proposed mechanism in the European Union to punish personnels from non-EU countries responsible for gross violations of human rights. Inspired by the Global Magnitsky Act in the US, the mechanism will enable the EU to maintain a list of human right violators around the globe, and impose on them various sanctions, such as visa bans or asset freeze.[1]

Background

In its history, the EU has on multiple occasions imposed sanctions on other countries for human right violations. Some of the examples include an arm embargo imposed on China since 1989 for the Tiananmen Square Massacre,[2] or asset freezes on certain officials in Iran who repressed and tortured human right activists.[3] However, those were individual sanctions which only targeted particular countries. This approach of adopting a new sanction policy for each country has its limitations, such as the time required to go through the legislation process in the EU or the political implications the process may bring.[4]

In 2016, the US enacted the Global Magnitsky Act which allows the US government to impose sanctions on human right violators on a global scope.[5] Multiple countries, including several members of the EU, soon followed the US's lead and enacted similar legislations to crack down on foreign human right violations. Estonia passed a law in 2016 banning foreigners deemed guilty of human right abuse from entering the country.[6] Lithuania,[7] Latvia,[8] and the United Kingdom,[9] which was a member of the EU at that time, also followed suit and passed similar laws. Additionally, the Dutch parliament has on multiple occasions requested the Dutch government to initiate a similar legislation. However the Dutch government refused and argued that such a legislation will be more effective if passed on the EU level, which led to the discussion of an EU level human rights sanction regime later.[10]

Developments

In late 2018, the Dutch government drafted a position paper named Towards An EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, in which it proposed an EU-level sanction regime as the title suggested. Following the proposal, the Dutch government invited representatives from all other EU member states to the Hague for discussion.[11] The European Parliament subsequently adopted a resolution regarding the proposed sanction regime on 14 March 2019, in which it called on the council to swiftly establish an EU-level human right sanction regime. The resolution also gave several suggestions regarding the regime, such as that it should symbolically carry Sergei Magnitsky’s name, and that an EU-level advisory committee may be set up to oversee the regime.[12]

On 9 December 2019, Josep Borrell, the EU High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, confirmed that the member states of the EU have reached a strong consensus on the proposed regime, and thus the European External Action Service will start to prepare the documentation for the sanction regime.[13]

After 6 months, the European Parliament passed a resolution regarding the Hong Kong national security law on 15 June 2020, in which it called for the council to finalise the preparatory work on the sanction regime, and to use the regime to impose sanctions on Chinese officials responsible for the Hong Kong national security legislation.[14]

Reasons for Implementation

A faster and more flexible process

At the present time, the procedure required to impose an EU sanction on an individual are complex and long, and is thus usually only utilized when a major event involving violent conflict or democratic backsliding occurred. Under the an article in the Lisbon Treaty concerning terrorism, any measures of freezing funds or assets must be adopted by the Council and the European Parliament through the normal legislative procedure. In contrast, the new sanction framework, albeit not yet finalized, can provide a more simple procedure to blacklist human right violators without having to adopt a new legislation everytime.[15]

Avoidance of unintended negative effect

All the previous sanctions imposed by the EU in the past, except the terrorism list, are all state-based sanctions. In contrast, the new sanction regime will be individual-based. While state-based sanctions may induce a deterrent effect on countries guilty of human rights violations, they may also unintendedly affect the social rights and the quality of life of innocent civilians living in the targeted state. For example, a trade ban targeted at a third country can significantly disrupt the distribution of food and sanitation supplies to vulnerable groups such as the poor or women, but the oppressive elites in the targeted state may be able to maintain their quality of life as they usually enjoy considerable wealth. This may also diminish the effectiveness of sanctions as the elites may be unaffected by them. Therefore, a sanction regime targeting individuals instead of states can avoid the unintended adverse impact on innocent civilians, while also being more effective in applying pressure to the personnels responsible for the human rights violations.[16]

References

  1. ^ "MEPs call for EU Magnitsky Act to impose sanctions on human rights abusers". The European Parliament. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  2. ^ "Specfic restrictive measures in relation to the events at the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989". EU Sanctions Map. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  3. ^ "Restrictive measures in relation to serious human rights violations in Iran". EU Sanctions Map. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  4. ^ "An EU human rights sanctions regime?" (PDF). The European Parliament. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  5. ^ "The US Global Magnitsky Act". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  6. ^ "Estonia joins US in passing Magnitsky law". EU Observer. 9 December 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  7. ^ Picard, Renee (16 November 2017). "Lithuania: Parliament Adopts Version of Magnitsky Act". Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  8. ^ Carolan, Sinead (9 February 2018). "Latvia Becomes Final Baltic State to Pass Magnitsky Law". Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  9. ^ "UK House of Commons Passes the Magnitsky Asset Freezing Sanctions". Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. 21 February 2017. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  10. ^ "The Magnitsky Act Comes to the EU: A Human Rights Sanctions Regime Proposed by the Netherlands". Netherlands Helsinki Committee. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  11. ^ Jozwiak, Rikard (19 November 2018). "Netherlands Proposes New EU Human Rights Sanctions Regime". Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  12. ^ "European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2019 on a European human rights violations sanctions regime". European Parliament. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  13. ^ Barigazzi, Jacopo (9 December 2019). "EU to prepare Magnitsky-style human rights sanctions regime". Politico. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  14. ^ "European Parliament resolution on the PRC national security law for Hong Kong and the need for the EU to defend Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy". European Parliament. Retrieved 5 July 2020.
  15. ^ "Targeted sanctions against individuals on grounds of grave human rights violations – impact, trends and prospects at EU leve" (PDF). Directorate General for External Policies of the Union, The European Union. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
  16. ^ Peksen, Dursun (January 2009). "Better or Worse? The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Human Rights". Journal of Peace Research. 46 (1): 59–77. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=EU_Global_Human_Rights_Sanctions_Regime&oldid=971880578"