Jump to content

Employ American Workers Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Forbes72 (talk | contribs) at 19:24, 13 September 2020 (removed Category:111th United States Congress; added Category:Acts of the 111th United States Congress using HotCat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Employ American Workers Act (EAWA) was a component of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, commonly called the "stimulus bill") passed by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by Barack Obama, then President of the United States, on February 17, 2009.[1][2][3][4] The Act had a validity period of two years and was set to expire on February 17, 2011.[1] It was not renewed, hence it sunset on February 17, 2011 and is no longer applicable.[5]

Provisions

EAWA affected only those companies that had received funds from one of these:[1][3]

EAWA imposed the requirement that all such companies would be classified as H-1B-dependent employers for their Labor Condition Applications, with the following caveats:

  • Whereas employers were exempt from the H-1B-dependency requirements when hiring for a position with an annual salary of more than $60,000 or a worker with a graduate degree, this exemption did not apply for the companies to which EAWA applied.
  • The rule applied to all companies where the employee had not yet started a job on H-1B. This included companies that had already received approvals on their Labor Condition Application. Such companies were only required to submit the additional information needed for the conditions of the EAWA rather than resubmit the whole LCA.[1][6]
  • The rule did not apply to workers seeking to extend their H-1B stay.[3]
  • Once a company had repaid all its Section 13 and TARP funding, it was no longer bound by these constraints and returned to being treated like other companies.[3]

Form I-129 was modified by the USCIS to include an additional sheet asking questions about receipt of TARP and Section 13 funding and repayment of the funds.[2]

The United States Department of the Treasury clarified that, if the Treasury merely holds warrants in an entity (such as through the Capital Purchase Program) that does not make the entity subject to EAWA.[7]

The concept of H-1B-dependent workers, originally introduced in the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998, was intended to apply to companies for which a substantial portion of the workforce used the H-1B. Its extension to companies that may not otherwise have a large H-1B workforce was due to concerns that government funds given to banks be used to tackle problems of unemployment and depression in the United States, rather than fund the livelihoods of foreigners.[8]

Reception

EAWA received sharp criticism from immigration lawyers and economists who alleged that the law was an act of economically irresponsible protectionism, and that it starved companies of talented workers precisely when they needed those workers the most.[5][8][9][10] An article in the Wall Street Journal noted that many students who had received confirmed job offers from financial institutions found their employers reneging on the offers due to the new restrictions.[9]

An article in EWeek noted that these restrictions on TARP and Section 13 recipients, most of them banks and other financial institutions, would likely make it easier for workers at technology companies to get H-1B visas, given the limited number of visas allotted every year and the fierce competition for those slots.[11]

References

  1. ^ a b c d "Employ American Workers Act (EAWA) and H-1B Petitions". United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  2. ^ a b "USCIS Announces New Requirements for Hiring H-1B Foreign Workers" (PDF). March 20, 2009. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  3. ^ a b c d "Fact Sheet #62Z" (PDF). Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  4. ^ "EAWA FAQ" (PDF). Federal Reserve System, in consultation with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  5. ^ a b Mehta, Cyrus D. (February 18, 2011). "EAWA HAS SUNSET". Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  6. ^ "9 FAM 41.53 EXHIBIT I EMPLOY AMERICAN WORKERS ACT (EAWA) RESTRICTIONS ON H-1B PETITIONS" (PDF). United States Department of State. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 30, 2009. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  7. ^ "FAQ on Capital Purchase Program and the Employ American Workers Act" (PDF). United States Department of the Treasury. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  8. ^ a b Paparelli, Angelo A.; Chiappari, Ted J. "The Employ American Workers Act: Protectionist Turducken, Immigration Style" (PDF). Seyfarth Shaw LLP. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  9. ^ a b Slaughter, Matthew J. (June 20, 2012). "How Skilled Immigrants Create Jobs. The Employ American Workers Act has achieved three things: Lost ideas. Lost jobs. Lost taxes". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  10. ^ Paparelli, Angelo A. (February 26, 2009). "Banking on Zombie Immigration". Immigration Daily. Retrieved March 29, 2015.
  11. ^ Mark, Roy (March 23, 2009). "USCIS Issues 2009 H-1B Visa Plans". EWeek. Retrieved March 29, 2015.