Jump to content

Arthur Milton Robins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs) at 22:26, 5 October 2020 (Copying from Category:20th-century American painters to Category:20th-century male artists using Cat-a-lot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Arthur Milton Robins (born October 23, 1953) is an American painter and sculptor. He is known for his series of Pool Room paintings as well as his involvement in Bery v. City of New York, a federal lawsuit settled by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1997.[1][2]

Career

Robins is known for his Pool Room paintings, which he says were inspired by his uncle’s pool room in Brooklyn, New York.  He is also known for his vast array and depiction of cityscapes, inspired by New York City living. Art critic Donald Kuspit called his series of Tunnel Paintings, “A new breakthrough in Expressionist Painting History.’’[3]

In 1980, Robins performed a one-man show in the lobby of a U.S. federal courthouse, which was so controversial it made news across the country.[4] The Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Museum of the City of New York both own works by Robins.[5]

Bery v. City of New York

In 1993, Robins was a co-founder of A.R.T.I.S.T (Artists Response To Illegal State Tactics) and a main litigant of a First Amendment lawsuit that was settled by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1997.[6][7] This settlement opened the way for thousands of artists in New York City to show and sell their work on the street of New York City without a permit or license.

2005 controversy

In 2005, Robins was accused of illegally placing art on the walls of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The works supposedly threatened the President George W. Bush and included a written letter and white powder. Arthur was detained at the Museum. Later that night, 5 detectives entered Arthur’s apartment and interrogated him at length. Arthur recorded this event and the story ended up on the front page of The New York Times.[8][9] Robins was never charged. This story led him to be asked to play himself in a film called This Revolution, a docudrama on events related to this issue.[10]  

Selected exhibitions

References

  1. ^ "Reviews of the Art of Arthur Robins | Arthur Robins.com...RevelationFineArt.com .... Poolpaintings.com". Retrieved 2019-05-02.
  2. ^ Lyman, Rick (1997-06-03). "SoHo Street Artists Triumph As High Court Rebuffs City". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-05-02.
  3. ^ "Reviews of the Art of Arthur Robins | Arthur Robins.com...RevelationFineArt.com .... Poolpaintings.com". Retrieved 2019-05-01.
  4. ^ Goldfarb, Myra (June 9, 1980). "ART VS. JURISPRUDENCE". The Morning Call. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  5. ^ Bogart, Michele (2000). Painting the Town: Paintings from the Museum of the City of New York. Yale University Press. pp. 328–329. ISBN 978-0300081992.
  6. ^ "Yahoo! Groups". groups.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2019-05-02.
  7. ^ Lyman, Rick (1997-06-03). "SoHo Street Artists Triumph As High Court Rebuffs City". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-05-01.
  8. ^ Arthur Robins (2007-04-08), #1-Five Detectives Grill Artist (Homeland Security At Work), retrieved 2019-05-01
  9. ^ Salamon, Julie (2004-06-12). "In a Post-9/11 World, the Police Star in an Artist's Reality Video". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-05-01.
  10. ^ This Revolution (2005) - IMDb, retrieved 2019-05-01