Jump to content

Jonathan Crowe

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lennart97 (talk | contribs) at 23:32, 14 October 2020 (fixed link to DAB page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jonathan George Crowe (born 1979) is an Australian legal philosopher. He is Professor of Law at Bond University.[1] Crowe is recognised internationally for his work on legal philosophy, ethics and public law.[2] He is a proponent of natural law theory in jurisprudence and ethics.[3] He is known in Australia for his advocacy on behalf of survivors of sexual violence.[4]

Career

Crowe commenced his academic career at the University of Queensland, before taking up a full professorship at Bond University. He is a regular visiting scholar at the University of Texas at Austin and has also held visiting positions at Georgetown University. He holds a PhD in law and philosophy from the University of Queensland.[5]

Crowe is an Honorary Life Member of the Australasian Society of Legal Philosophy, having served as its President from 2014 to 2018 (succeeding Jeffrey Goldsworthy).[6] He is also a former President of the Australian Dispute Resolution Research Network.[7] He co-edits the Journal of Legal Philosophy with Hillary Nye.[8]

Scholarship

Crowe is best known internationally for his writings on legal philosophy and ethics, particularly his interpretation of the natural law tradition.[9] He has also produced significant bodies of work on constitutional law, rape and sexual assault law, international humanitarian law and dispute resolution.[10]

Natural law theory

Crowe’s book Natural Law and the Nature of Law argues against traditional ideas of natural law as timeless and unchanging.[11] Rather, he proposes a ‘diachronic’ conception of natural law as evolving over time.[12] Crowe describes natural law as ‘socially embodied, historically extended and dependent on facts about human nature.’[13] Natural law, on this view, is shaped by both inherent human qualities and the natural and social environments of human communities.[14] It reflects ‘the ongoing human quest to work out how best to live flourishing, fulfilling lives given the nature we have and the social worlds we inhabit.’[15]

Artifact theory of law

Crowe defends a theory of the nature of law that focuses on law’s character as a human artifact.[16] He argues that artifacts are defined primarily by reference to their functions.[17] Law’s function is ‘to serve as a deontic marker by creating a sense of social obligation’.[18] Crowe contends that a law that is poorly suited to perform this function is defective, while a purported legal enactment that is incapable of performing this function fails to qualify as law.[19] A law that is so unjust that it is incapable of creating a sense of social obligation will therefore be no law at all.[20]

Judicial interpretation

Crowe’s work on judicial interpretation is critical of originalism. He argues that judges should give legal documents their ordinary contemporary meaning, rather than the meaning they held when first enacted.[21] This is necessary to preserve law’s function as a means of social coordination.[22] Crowe argues that judges should interpret laws in light of social practices and institutions, relying on ‘historically extended narratives’.[23] He terms this theory ‘wide contextualism’.[24] He further contends that, where the law is unjust, judges should bring it into dialogue with moral values to reach a practically reasonable outcome.[25]

Political philosophy

Crowe challenges the traditional focus of natural law theory on state institutions.[26] He highlights the important role of non-state forms of order, such as evolved social norms and practices, in securing the common good.[27] Crowe argues that justice is best understood as the outcome of ethical relations between embodied persons, rather than as a set of idealised institutions imposed on society from above. He describes this idea as ‘small justice’.[28] He criticises competing theories of justice, such as that of John Rawls, for neglecting the role of interpersonal interactions in ensuring justice at a societal level.[29]

Existentialism

Crowe’s work on legal and ethical theory is influenced by existentialism, particularly the writings of Emmanuel Levinas. His doctoral thesis examined the intersections between existentialist ethics and natural law theory.[30] Crowe draws attention to the important role of time in Levinas’s writings. He argues that the temporal (or diachronic) dimension of Levinas’s theory bridges the gap between his ethics and his political philosophy.[31]

Mediation ethics

In collaborative work with Rachael Field, Crowe has argued for a new understanding of the ethics of mediation.[32] Traditional views of mediation ethics focus on mediator neutrality or impartiality. However, Field and Crowe contend these notions are unhelpful and unrealistic when applied to mediation practice.[33] Instead, they propose a new ethical paradigm centred on party self-determination.[34] This approach is supported by ‘a focus on informed consent and an ethos of professionalism’.[35] Field and Crowe defend a contextual ethical method as the most suitable way of resolving ethical dilemmas in mediation practice.[36]

Advocacy

Crowe is a founding Co-Director with Rachael Burgin and Saxon Mullins of Rape and Sexual Assault Research and Advocacy (RASARA), an Australia-wide organisation working to shape community responses to sexual violence.[37] The organisation describes itself as ‘survivor-focused’, ‘evidence-based’ and ‘reform-orientated’.[38] He is also involved in a high-profile public advocacy campaign with author and activist Bri Lee to reform the mistake of fact excuse in Queensland rape law.[39] Crowe and Lee’s advocacy led the Queensland Attorney-General to refer this issue to the Queensland Law Reform Commission in July 2019.[40]

Books

  • Rachael Field and Jonathan Crowe, Mediation Ethics: From Theory to Practice (Edward Elgar, 2020)
  • Jonathan Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2019)
  • Jonathan Crowe and Constance Youngwon Lee (eds), Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory (Edward Elgar, 2019)
  • Jonathan Crowe, Legal Theory (Thomson Reuters, 3rd ed., 2019)
  • Rebecca Ananian-Welsh and Jonathan Crowe (eds), Judicial Independence in Australia: Contemporary Challenges, Future Directions (Federation Press, 2016)
  • Jonathan Crowe, Legal Theory (Thomson Reuters, 2nd ed., 2014)
  • Jonathan Crowe and Kylie Weston-Scheuber, Principles of International Humanitarian Law (Edward Elgar, 2013)
  • Suri Ratnapala and Jonathan Crowe, Australian Constitutional Law: Foundations and Theory (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2012)
  • Jonathan Crowe, Legal Theory (Thomson Reuters, 2009)

References

  1. ^ Jonathan Crowe. bond.edu.au. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  2. ^ Lara Bullock, Bond University Appoints Trio of Academics. lawyersweekly.com.au. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  3. ^ Jonathan Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2019).
  4. ^ Jonathan Crowe, Queensland Rape Law ‘Loophole’ Could Remain After Review Ignores Concerns About Rape Myths and Consent. theconversation.com. Retrieved on 6 September 2020; Jonathan Crowe, Consent is Not a 'Romance Killer': The Mistake of Fact Defence for Rape Needs to Go. theguardian.com. Retrieved on 16 March 2019; Felicity Robinson, She Didn’t Consent. He Misunderstood. Is it Rape?. primer.com.au. Retrieved on 26 September 2019; Lydia Lynch, ‘It is Horrific': The Queensland Law Allowing Rapists Off Scot-Free. brisbanetimes.com.au. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  5. ^ Curriculum Vitae. academia.edu. Retrieved on 22 September 2020.
  6. ^ About Us. aslp.org.au. Retrieved on 1 October 2018; Jonathan Crowe. academia.edu. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  7. ^ Jonathan Crowe. academia.edu. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  8. ^ Journal of Legal Philosophy. elgaronline.com. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  9. ^ John Finnis, Natural Law Theories. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved on 6 September 2020; Mark C Murphy, The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  10. ^ Jonathan Crowe. bond.edu.au. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  11. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 3-4.
  12. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 246.
  13. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 6.
  14. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 6-7.
  15. ^ Jonathan Crowe, ‘Natural Law and the Nature of Law in a Nutshell' (2019) 44 Australasian Journal of Legal Philosophy 100, 101.
  16. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, ch 8-9.
  17. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 161.
  18. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 175.
  19. ^ Crowe, ‘Natural Law and the Nature of Law in a Nutshell’, 103.
  20. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 176-7.
  21. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, ch 11.
  22. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 208.
  23. ^ Jonathan Crowe, ‘The Narrative Model of Constitutional Implications: A Defence of Roach v Electoral Commissioner’ (2019) 42 University of New South Wales Law Journal 91; Jonathan Crowe, ‘Not-So-Easy Cases’ (2019) 40 Statute Law Review 75.
  24. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 215; Jonathan Crowe, ‘The Role of Contextual Meaning in Judicial Interpretation’ (2013) 41 Federal Law Review 417.
  25. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, ch 12.
  26. ^ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, ch 6.
  27. ^ Jonathan Crowe, ‘Natural Law and the Nature of Law: A Response to Commentators’ (2019) 44 Australasian Journal of Legal Philosophy 133, 138-41; Jonathan Crowe, ‘Natural Law Anarchism’ (2014) 7 Studies in Emergent Order 288.
  28. ^ Jonathan Crowe, ‘Small Justice: The Rights of the Other Animal’ in Peter Atterton and Tamra Wright (eds), Face-to-Face with Animals: Levinas and the Animal Question (State University of New York Press, 2019); Jonathan Crowe, ‘The Idea of Small Justice’, Julius Stone Institute Seminar Series (University of Sydney, 27 June 2019).
  29. ^ Crowe, ‘The Idea of Small Justice’.
  30. ^ Jonathan Crowe, Existentialism, Liberty and the Ethical Foundations of Law (PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, 2006).
  31. ^ Jonathan Crowe, ‘Levinas on Shared Ethical Judgments’ (2011) 42(3) Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 233; Jonathan Crowe, ‘Levinasian Ethics and the Concept of Law’ in Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
  32. ^ Rachael Field and Jonathan Crowe, Mediation Ethics: From Theory to Practice (Edward Elgar, 2020).
  33. ^ Field and Crowe, Mediation Ethics, ch 5-6.
  34. ^ Field and Crowe, Mediation Ethics, ch 9.
  35. ^ Field and Crowe, Mediation Ethics, 6.
  36. ^ Field and Crowe, Mediation Ethics, ch 10.
  37. ^ Jonathan Crowe. jonathancrowe.org. Retrieved on 6 September 2020; Our Board. rasara.org. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  38. ^ Rape and Sexual Assault Research and Advocacy. rasara.org. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  39. ^ Consent Law in Queensland. consentlawqld.com. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  40. ^ Josh Robertson, Queensland Will Abolish Rape Defence 'Loophole' if Law Reform Experts Recommend It. abc.net.au. Retrieved on 6 September 2020; Leanne Edmistone, Battered by Twin Traumas: When Rape Victims Say the Anguish They Suffer from the Legal System is Almost as Bad as the Crime Itself, Something Needs to be Done. QWeekend Magazine, The Courier-Mail (13 July 2019).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonathan_Crowe&oldid=983564854"