Epanorthosis
This article is missing information about specific types of epanorthosis with examples of each. (Idea: is there a euphemistic or dysphemistic usage of epanorthosis?). (March 2014) |
An epanorthosis is a figure of speech that signifies emphatic word replacement.[1] "Thousands, no, millions!" is a stock example. Epanorthosis as immediate and emphatic self-correction often follows a Freudian slip (either accidental or deliberate).
Etymology
The word epanorthosis, attested 1570, is from Ancient Greek epanórthōsis (ἐπανόρθωσις) "correcting, revision" < epí (ἐπί) + anorthóō (ἀνορθόω) "restore, rebuild" < ana- (ἀνα-) "up" + orthóō (ὀρθόω) "straighten" < orthós (ὀρθός) "straight, right" (hence to "straighten up").
Examples
- "Seems, madam! Nay, it is; I know not 'seems.'" (Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 2)
- "The psychologist known as Sigmund Fraud—Freud, I mean!"
- "I've been doing this for six weeks!—er, days, that is."
- "Man has parted company with his trusty friend the horse and has sailed into the azure with the eagles, eagles being represented by the infernal combustion engine–er er, internal combustion engine. [loud laughter] Internal combustion engine! Engine!" – Winston Churchill[2]
The words in italics are technically the epanorthoses, but all the words following the dash may be considered part of the epanorthosis as well. Striking through words is another way of demonstrating such an effect.
In Aviation English phraseology, the word "correction" must be explicitly used: "climb to reach Flight Level 290 at time 58 — correction at time 55".
A modern variant is the use of ^H (as in "We've always used COBOL^H^H^H^H") to suggest a backspace, or ^W to suggest deletion of the preceding word. Both may be repeated as necessary.
References
- ^ "Epanorthosis". Silva Rhetoricae. Archived from the original on 5 May 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
- ^ Langworth, Richard (ed.). Churchill By Himself: The Definitive Collection of Quotations. PublicAffairs. p. 297. ISBN 978-1-58648-957-1. Retrieved December 30, 2011.