Jump to content

William T. L. Cox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 03:13, 9 January 2021 (Add: bibcode. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:University of Wisconsin–Madison faculty‎ | via #UCB_Category 310/946). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

William T. L. Cox
Born (1984-11-14) November 14, 1984 (age 39)
Alma materUniversity of Florida (B.S.)
University of Wisconsin-Madison (Ph.D.)
Known forImplicit bias
Gaydar
Scientific career
FieldsPsychology
InstitutionsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison (Assistant Scientist)
Websitewww.sciencecox.com

William Taylor Laimaka Cox is an assistant scientist in the department of psychology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.[1] He is an experimental cognitive scientist specializing in stereotyping, prejudice, and learning. His work explores the cultural and cognitive mechanisms that perpetuate stereotypes and prejudices and applies the understanding of those mechanisms to effective evidence-based interventions to reduce bias.[2]

Cox and Devine have conducted research on the cognitive structure of stereotypes, demonstrating that some stereotypes primarily serve as categorization cues, especially those stereotypes related to social groups with non-visible defining features, like gay men.[3][4] Whereas other researchers have argued that people have an accurate "gaydar" ability that enables people to visually identify whether someone is gay or straight, Cox, Devine, and their colleagues argued that "gaydar" is simply an alternate label for using stereotypes to infer orientation (e.g., inferring that fashionable men are gay), and thereby serves the function of a legitimizing myth to reduce the normative stigma associated with stereotyping. The researchers point out that past work arguing that people have accurate "gaydar" falls prey to the false positive paradox (see also the base rate fallacy), because the alleged accuracy discounts the very low base rate of LGB people in real populations, resulting in a scenario where the "accuracy" of gaydar reported in lab studies translates to high levels of inaccuracy in the real world.[5]

References

  1. ^ "William T. L. Cox (Professional Website)".
  2. ^ Jessica Nordell (May 7, 2017). "Is This How Discrimination Ends?". The Atlantic. Retrieved August 17, 2017.
  3. ^ Cox, William T. L.; Devine, Patricia G. (2015). "Stereotypes possess heterogeneous directionality: A theoretical and empirical exploration of stereotype structure and content". PLoS One. 10 (3): 1–15. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1022292C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122292. PMC 4374885. PMID 25811181.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  4. ^ Cox, William T. L.; Devine, Patricia G.; Bischmann, Alyssa A.; Hyde, Janet S. (2016). "Inferences About Sexual Orientation: The Roles of Stereotypes, Faces, and The Gaydar Myth". The Journal of Sex Research. 52 (8): 1–15. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1015714. PMC 4731319. PMID 26219212.
  5. ^ Cox, William T. L.; Devine, Patricia G.; Bischmann, Alyssa A.; Hyde, Janet S. (2016). "Ecological invalidity of existing gaydar research: In-lab accuracy translates to real-world inaccuracy. Response to Rule, Johnson, & Freeman (2016)". The Journal of Sex Research. 54 (7): 820–824. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1278570. PMID 28276940. S2CID 24436549.