Portal frame
This article needs additional citations for verification. (November 2013) |
Portal frame structures are designed to span between supports and rely on fixed joints with moment resisting capacity where vertical supports connect to horizontal beams or trusses. Portal frame structures can be constructed using a variety of materials and methods. These include steel, reinforced concrete and laminated timber such as glulam. The connections between the columns and the rafters are designed to be moment-resistant, i.e. they can carry bending forces.[1] "They were first developed in the 1960s, and have now become the most common form of enclosure for spans of 20 to 60 m"[2]
Because of these very strong and rigid joints, some of the bending moment in the rafters is transferred to the columns. This means that the size of the rafters can be reduced or the span can be increased for the same size rafters. This makes portal frames a very efficient construction technique to use for wide span buildings.
Portal frame construction is therefore typically seen in warehouses, barns and other places where large, open spaces are required at low cost and a pitched roof is acceptable.
Generally portal frames are used for single-story buildings but they can be used for low-rise buildings with several floors where they can be economic if the floors do not span right across the building (in these circumstances a skeleton frame, with internal columns, would be a more economic choice). A typical configuration might be where there is office space built against one wall of a warehouse.
Portal frames can be clad with all sorts of material but the most popular solution, for reasons of economy and speed, is some form of lightweight insulated metal cladding with cavity masonry work to the bottom 2m of the wall to provide security and impact resistance. The lightweight cladding would be carried on sheeting rails spanning between the columns of the portal frames.
Portal frames can be defined as two-dimensional rigid frames that have the basic characteristics of a rigid joint between column and beam.
The main objective of this form of design is to reduce bending moment in the beam, which allows the frame to act as one structural unit.
The transfer of stresses from the beam to the column results in rotational movement at the foundation, which can be overcome by the introduction of a pin/hinge joint.
For warehouses and industrial buildings, sloping roof made of purlins and ac sheet roofing between portals is provided. For assembly halls, portals with R.C slab roof cast monolithically is used.
Portal frames are designed for the following loads:
- roof load
- wind load
Previously, it has been shown that the LRFD and ASD can produce significantly different designs of steel gable frames.[3]
There are few situations where ASD produces significantly lighter weight steel gable frame designs. Additionally, it has been shown that in high snow regions, the difference between the methods is more dramatic.[4]
While designing, care should be taken for proper
- joints
- foundation
- bracing
If the joints are not rigid, they will "open up" and the frame will be unstable when subjected to loads. This is the pack of cards effect.
- Vertical loading results in the walls being pushed outwards. If the foundation cannot resist horizontal push, outward movement will occur and the frame will lose strength.
- Wind subjects the frame to uplift forces. Overturning forces on the sides and ends of the building. Drag forces on the roof and sides.
- These destabilizing forces are resisted essentially by the weight of the building and in this regard, the foundations contribute significantly to this weight. The foundations are regarded as the building's anchors.
References
- ^ "Portal frames". www.steelconstruction.info. Retrieved 4 April 2019.
- ^ Trebilcock, Peter, and R. M. Lawson. Architectural design in steel. London: Spon Press, 2004. Print. 31.
- ^ Naser Katanbafnezhad, and Alan Hoback. "Comparison of LRFD and ASD for Pre-Fabricated Gable Frame Design.
- ^ Katanbafnezhad, Naser, and Alan Hoback. "Pre-Fabricated Gable Frame Design in High Snow Regions-Comparison of LRFD and ASD." AJER 9.6 (2020): 160-168.