Jump to content

Abortion: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Whatever404 (talk | contribs)
3,583 edits
→See also: redirect
Tom Lennox (talk | contribs)
224 edits
←Replaced content with 'It's murder'
Line 1: Line 1:
It's murder
{{pp-semi|small=yes|expiry=October 14, 2013}}
{{Abortion}}
{{Abortion by country sidebar}}
<!--Note to editors: This article has a long and intense history of terminology debates. Please review the talk page before making changes to lines to see if there is a previous established consensus or compromise. Thank you.-->
An '''abortion''' is the termination of a [[pregnancy (mammals)|pregnancy]] by the removal or expulsion of an [[embryo]] or [[fetus]] from the [[uterus]], resulting in or caused by its death. An abortion can occur spontaneously due to [[Complication (medicine)|complications]] during pregnancy or can be induced. ''Abortion'' as a term most commonly refers to the induced abortion of a [[pregnancy|human pregnancy]], while spontaneous abortions are usually termed [[miscarriage]]s.

Abortion has a long [[history of abortion|history]] and has been induced by various methods including herbal [[abortifacient]]s, the use of sharpened tools, physical trauma and other [[traditional medicine|traditional methods]]. Modern medicine utilizes [[medication]]s and [[surgery|surgical procedures]] to induce abortion. The [[abortion law|legality]], prevalence, and cultural views on abortion vary substantially around the world. In many parts of the world there is a divisive [[Abortion debate|public debate]] over the [[Ethical aspects of abortion|ethical]] and [[Abortion law|legal]] aspects of abortion between the [[pro-life]] and [[pro-choice]] movements. The approximate number of induced abortions performed worldwide in 2003 was 42 million, which declined from nearly 46 million in 1995.<ref name="Worldwide">{{cite journal |first=Gilda |last=Sedgh |coauthors=Stanley Henshaw, Susheela Singh, Elisabeth Åhman and Iqbal H. Shah |year=2007 |month=October |title=Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide |journal=[[The Lancet]] |volume=370 |issue=9595 |pages=1338–1345 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61575-X |pmid=17933648 |url=http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2007/10/17/13/Chang-Guttmacher_Institute_abortion_report.source.prod_affiliate.91.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2008-12-02}}</ref>

==Types of abortion==
===Spontaneous abortion===
{{main|Miscarriage}}

Spontaneous abortion (also known as miscarriage) is the expulsion of an embryo or fetus due to accidental trauma or [[Death by natural causes|natural causes]] before the 20th [[gestational age|week of gestation]]. Most miscarriages are due to incorrect replication of chromosomes; they can also be caused by environmental factors. A pregnancy that ends between 20 and 37 weeks of gestation, if it results in a [[Live birth|live-born]] infant, is known as a "[[premature birth]]". When a fetus dies [[in utero]] after about 20 weeks, or during [[childbirth|delivery]], it is usually termed "[[stillbirth|stillborn]]". Premature births and stillbirths are generally not considered to be miscarriages although usage of these terms can sometimes overlap.

Most miscarriages occur very early in pregnancy. Between 10% and 50% of pregnancies end in clinically apparent miscarriage, depending upon the age and health of the pregnant woman.<ref>"[http://wuphysicians.wustl.edu/dept.asp?pageID=8&ID=35 Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility: Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (Recurrent Miscarriage)]." (n.d.) Retrieved 2006-01-18 from Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology web site.</ref> In most cases, they occur so early in the pregnancy that the woman is not even aware that she was pregnant. One study testing hormones for ovulation and pregnancy found that 61.9% of conceptuses were lost prior to 12 weeks, and 91.7% of these losses occurred subclinically, without the knowledge of the woman.<ref name="pmid7117572">{{cite journal |author=Edmonds DK, Lindsay KS, Miller JF, Williamson E, Wood PJ |title=Early embryonic mortality in women |journal=Fertil. Steril. |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=447–53 |year=1982 |pmid=7117572 |doi=}}</ref>

The risk of spontaneous abortion decreases sharply after the 10th week from the last menstrual period [[gestational age|(LMP)]],<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2176898.stm |title=Q&A: Miscarriage |date=2002-08-06 |publisher=[[BBC]] |accessdate=2008-12-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Lennart |last=Nilsson |authorlink=Lennart Nilsson |coauthors=Lars Hamberger |title=A child is born |publisher=[[Doubleday (publisher)|Doubleday]] |location=[[Garden City, New York]] |year=1990 |origdate=1965 |pages= |isbn=0-385-40085-3 |oclc=21412111}}{{pn}}</ref> with a loss rate between 8.5 weeks LMP and birth of about two percent; pregnancy loss is “virtually complete by the end of the embryonic period."<ref>{{cite book |first=E. |last=Jauniaux |coauthors=P. Kaminopetros and H. El-Rafaey |chapter=Early pregnancy loss |editor=Martin J. Whittle and C. H. Rodeck |title=Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical practice |publisher=Churchill Livingstone |location=Edinburgh |year=1999 |page=[http://books.google.com/books?id=0BY0hx2l5uoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA835,M1 835] |isbn=0-443-05357-X |oclc=42792567}}</ref>

This risk of spontaneous abortion is greater in those with a known history of several spontaneous abortions or an induced abortion, those with systemic diseases, and those over the age 35. Other causes can be infection (of either the woman or fetus), immune response, or serious systemic disease. A spontaneous abortion can also be caused by accidental [[Physical trauma|trauma]]; intentional trauma or stress to cause miscarriage is considered induced abortion or [[feticide]].<ref name="Fetal Homicide Laws">{{cite web |url=http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/fethom.htm |title=Fetal Homicide Laws |accessdate=2008-03-20 |publisher=[[National Conference of State Legislatures]]}}</ref>

===Induced abortion===
A pregnancy can be intentionally aborted in many ways. The manner selected depends chiefly upon the [[gestational age]] of the embryo or fetus, in addition to the legality, regional availability, and doctor-patient preference for specific procedures. Reasons for procuring induced abortions are typically characterized as either therapeutic or elective. An abortion is medically referred to as therapeutic when it is performed to:
*save the life of the pregnant woman;<ref name="roche1">Roche, Natalie E. (2004). [http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3311.htm Therapeutic Abortion]. Retrieved 2006-03-08.</ref>
*preserve the woman's physical or mental health;<ref name="roche1"/>
*terminate pregnancy that would result in a child born with a [[congenital disorder]] that would be [[death|fatal]] or associated with significant [[morbidity]];<ref name="roche1"/> or
*[[selective reduction|selectively reduce]] the number of fetuses to lessen health risks associated with [[multiple birth|multiple pregnancy]].<ref name="roche1"/>

==Abortion methods==
===Surgical===
[[Image:Abortionmethods.png|thumb|350px|right|[[Gestational age]] may determine which abortion methods are practiced.]]
In the first 12 weeks, [[suction-aspiration abortion|suction-aspiration]] or vacuum abortion is the most common method.<ref>{{cite web |author=Healthwise |url=http://www.webmd.com/hw/womens_conditions/tw1078.asp#tw1112 |title=Manual and vacuum aspiration for abortion |year=2004 |publisher=[[WebMD]] |accessdate=2008-12-05}}</ref> ''Manual [[Vacuum aspiration]]'' (MVA) abortion consists of removing the [[fetus]] or [[embryo]] by suction using a manual [[syringe]], while ''electric [[vacuum aspiration]]'' (EVA) abortion uses an electric [[pump]]. These techniques are comparable, and differ in the mechanism used to apply suction, how early in pregnancy they can be used, and whether cervical dilation is necessary. MVA, also known as "mini-suction" and "[[menstrual extraction]]", can be used in very early pregnancy, and does not require cervical dilation. Surgical techniques are sometimes referred to as 'Suction (or surgical) Termination Of Pregnancy' (STOP). From the 15th week until approximately the 26th, [[dilation and evacuation]] (D&E) is used. D&E consists of opening the [[cervix]] of the [[uterus]] and emptying it using surgical instruments and suction.

''[[Dilation and curettage]]'' (D&C), the second most common method of abortion, is a standard gynecological procedure performed for a variety of reasons, including examination of the uterine lining for possible malignancy, investigation of abnormal bleeding, and abortion. ''[[Curettage]]'' refers to cleaning the walls of the [[uterus]] with a [[curette]]. The [[World Health Organization]] recommends this procedure, also called ''sharp curettage,'' only when MVA is unavailable.<ref>{{cite book |author=[[World Health Organization]] |chapter=Dilatation and curettage |chapterurl=http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/impac/Procedures/Dilatetion_P61_P63.html |title=Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors |publisher=[[World Health Organization]] |location=[[Geneva]] |year=2003 |pages= |isbn=92-4-154587-9 |oclc=181845530 |accessdate=2008-12-05}}</ref> The term ''D and C'', or sometimes ''suction curette'', is used as a [[euphemism]] for the first trimester abortion procedure, whichever the method used.

Other techniques must be used to induce abortion in the second [[trimester]]. Premature delivery can be induced with [[prostaglandin]]; this can be coupled with injecting the [[amniotic sac|amniotic fluid]] with caustic solutions containing [[saline (medicine)|saline]] or [[urea]]. After the 16th week of gestation, abortions can be induced by [[intact dilation and extraction]] (IDX) (also called intrauterine cranial decompression), which requires surgical decompression of the fetus' head before evacuation. IDX is sometimes called "[[partial-birth abortion]]," which has been [[Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act|federally banned]] in the United States. A [[hysterotomy abortion]] is a procedure similar to a [[caesarean section]], and is performed under [[general anesthesia]] because it is considered major abdominal surgery. It requires a smaller incision than a caesarean section and is used during later stages of pregnancy.<ref name="encarta">{{cite encyclopedia |last=McGee |first=Glenn |authorlink=Glenn McGee |coauthors=[[Jon F. Merz]] |encyclopedia=[[Encarta]] |title=Abortion |url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761553899/Abortion.html |accessdate=2008-12-05 |publisher=[[Microsoft]]}}</ref>

From the 20th to 23rd week of gestation, an [[medical injection|injection]] to stop the fetal [[heart]] can be used as the first phase of the surgical abortion procedure<ref>{{cite journal |author=Vause S, Sands J, Johnston TA, Russell S, Rimmer S |title=Could some fetocides be avoided by more prompt referral after diagnosis of fetal abnormality? |journal=J Obstet Gynaecol |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=243–5 |year=2002 |month=May |pmid=12521492 |doi=10.1080/01443610220130490 |url=http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/01443610220130490&magic=pubmed&#124;&#124;1B69BA326FFE69C3F0A8F227DF8201D0 |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Dommergues M, Cahen F, Garel M, Mahieu-Caputo D, Dumez Y |title=Feticide during second- and third-trimester termination of pregnancy: opinions of health care professionals |journal=Fetal. Diagn. Ther. |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=91–7 |year=2003 |pmid=12576743 |doi=10.1159/000068068 |url=http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&file=fdt18091 |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Bhide A, Sairam S, Hollis B, Thilaganathan B |title=Comparison of feticide carried out by cordocentesis versus cardiac puncture |journal=Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=230–2 |year=2002 |month=September |pmid=12230443 |doi=10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00797.x |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Senat MV, Fischer C, Bernard JP, Ville Y |title=The use of lidocaine for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy |journal=BJOG |volume=110 |issue=3 |pages=296–300 |year=2003 |month=March |pmid=12628271 |doi= 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02217.x|url=http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pubmed&issn=1470-0328&date=2003&volume=110&issue=3&spage=296 |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Senat MV, Fischer C, Ville Y |title=Funipuncture for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy |journal=Prenat. Diagn. |volume=22 |issue=5 |pages=354–6 |year=2002 |month=May |pmid=12001185 |doi=10.1002/pd.290 |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> to ensure that the fetus is not born alive.<ref>{{cite book |author=Nuffield Council on Bioethics |chapter=Clinical perspectives (Continued) |chapterurl=http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/browseablepublications/criticalCareDecisionFetalNeonatalMedicine/report_542.html |accessdate=2008-12-03 |title=Critical Case Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues |publisher=Nuffield Council on Bioethics |location= |year=2006 |isbn=1-904384-14-5 |oclc=85782378}}</ref>

===Medical===
{{main|Medical abortion}}

Effective in the first trimester of pregnancy, non-surgical abortions (referred to as 'medical abortions') comprise 10% of all abortions in the United States and Europe. Combined regimens include [[methotrexate]] or [[mifepristone]], followed by a [[prostaglandin]] (either [[misoprostol]] or [[gemeprost]]: misoprostol is used in the U.S.; gemeprost is used in the UK and Sweden.) When used within 49 days gestation, approximately 92% of women undergoing medical abortion with a combined regimen completed it without surgical intervention.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Spitz, I.M. et al|title=Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|year=1998|volume=338|issue=18|pmid=9562577|doi=10.1056/NEJM199804303381801|page=1241|pages=1241}}</ref> Misoprostol can be used alone, but has a lower efficacy rate than combined regimens. In cases of failure of medical abortion, vacuum or manual aspiration is used to complete the abortion surgically.

===Other methods===
[[Image:Angkordemon.jpg|thumb|left|[[Bas-relief]] at [[Angkor Wat]], [[Cambodia]], c. 1150, depicting a [[demon]] inducing an abortion by pounding a mallet into a woman's belly.]] Historically, a number of [[herb]]s reputed to possess [[abortifacient]] properties have been used in [[folk medicine]]: [[tansy]], [[pennyroyal]], [[black cohosh]], and the now-extinct [[silphium]] (see [[Abortion#History of abortion|history of abortion]]).<ref name="riddle2">{{cite book |first=John M. |last=Riddle |title=Eve's herbs: a history of contraception and abortion in the West |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |location=[[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] |year=1997 |pages= |isbn=0-674-27024-X |oclc=36126503}}{{pn}}</ref> The use of herbs in such a manner can cause serious — even lethal — side effects, such as [[multiple organ dysfunction syndrome|multiple organ failure]], and is not recommended by [[physician]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Ciganda C, Laborde A |title=Herbal infusions used for induced abortion |journal=J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. |volume=41 |issue=3 |pages=235–9 |year=2003 |pmid=12807304 |doi=10.1081/CLT-120021104 |url= |accessdate=2008-12-04}}</ref>

Abortion is sometimes attempted by causing trauma to the [[abdomen]]. The degree of force, if severe, can cause serious internal injuries without necessarily succeeding in inducing [[miscarriage]].<ref>Education for Choice. (2005-05-06). <nowiki>http://www.efc.org.uk/Foryoungpeople/Factsaboutabortion/Unsafeabortion</nowiki>{{Dead link|date=December 2008}} Unsafe abortion. Retrieved 2006-01-11.</ref> Both accidental and deliberate abortions of this kind can be subject to criminal liability in many countries. In [[Myanmar|Burma]], [[Indonesia]], [[Malaysia]], the [[Philippines]], and [[Thailand]], there is an ancient tradition of attempting abortion through forceful abdominal [[massage]].<ref name="potts">{{cite journal |first=Malcolm |last=Potts |authorlink=Malcolm Potts |coauthors=Martha Campbell |year=2002 |title=History of Contraception |journal=Gynecology and Obstetrics |volume=6 |issue=8 |url=http://big.berkeley.edu/ifplp.history.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2008-12-04}}</ref>

Reported methods of unsafe, [[self-induced abortion]] include misuse of [[misoprostol]], and insertion of non-surgical implements such as [[knitting needle]]s and [[clothes hanger]]s into the [[uterus]]. These methods are rarely seen in developed countries where surgical abortion is legal and available.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Thapa SR, Rimal D, Preston J |title=Self induction of abortion with instrumentation |journal=Aust Fam Physician |volume=35 |issue=9 |pages=697–8 |year=2006 |month=September |pmid=16969439 |doi= |url=http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/200609/11015 |accessdate=2008-12-04}}</ref>
{{clr}}<!-- The clr tag prevents the picture from running into the next section. Please keep it at the bottom of this section. -->

==Health considerations==
Early-term surgical abortion is a simple procedure which is safer than [[childbirth]] when performed before the 16th week.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Henshaw |first=Stanley K. |title=Induced Abortion: A World Review, 1990 |journal=International Family Planning Perspectives |volume=23 |issue=2 |pages=246–252 |year=1990 |month=June}}</ref><ref name="grimes">{{cite journal |author=Grimes DA |title=The morbidity and mortality of pregnancy: still risky business |journal=Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. |volume=170 |issue=5 Pt 2 |pages=1489–94 |year=1994 |pmid=8178896 |doi= |url=}}</ref> Abortion methods, like most [[minimally invasive procedure]]s, carry a small potential for serious complications.<ref>{{cite book |author=[[World Health Organization]] |title=Medical Methods for Termination of Pregnancy: Report of a Who Scientific Group |series=Who Technical Report Series No. 871 |publisher=[[World Health Organization]] |location=[[Geneva]] |year=1997 |pages= |isbn=92-4-120871-6 |oclc=38276325}}{{pn}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=Slava V. |last=Gaufberg |date=2006-08-29 |publisher=eMedicine |title=Abortion, Complications |url=http://www.emedicine.com/emerg/topic4.htm |accessdate=2007-06-30}}</ref> The risk of complications can increase depending on how far [[pregnancy]] has progressed.<ref name="pauli">{{cite journal |author=Pauli E, Haller U, Zimmermann R |title=[Morbidity of dilatation and evacuation in the second trimester: an analysis] |language=German |journal=Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=107–15 |year=2005 |pmid=15818053 |doi=10.1159/000083785 |url=}}</ref><ref name="bartley">{{cite journal |author=Bartley J, Tong S, Everington D, Baird DT |title=Parity is a major determinant of success rate in medical abortion: a retrospective analysis of 3161 consecutive cases of early medical abortion treated with reduced doses of mifepristone and vaginal gemeprost |journal=Contraception |volume=62 |issue=6 |pages=297–303 |year=2000 |pmid=11239616 |doi=10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00187-6}}</ref>

Women typically experience minor pain during first-trimester abortion procedures. In a 1979 study of 2,299 patients, 97% reported experiencing some degree of pain. Patients rated the pain as being less than earache or toothache, but more than headache or backache.<ref name="pmid443287">{{cite journal |author=Smith GM, Stubblefield PG, Chirchirillo L, McCarthy MJ |title=Pain of first-trimester abortion: its quantification and relations with other variables |journal=Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. |volume=133 |issue=5 |pages=489–98 |year=1979 |pmid=443287 |doi= |url=}}</ref> Local and general anesthetics are used during surgical procedures<ref>[http://www.womensmedcenter.com/faqs/default.asp Women's Center Medical]{{Verify credibility|date=December 2008}}</ref>

===Mental health===
{{Main|Abortion and mental health}}
The relationship between induced abortion and [[mental health]] is an area of controversy.<ref name="Bazelon"/><ref name="now">[http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/329/index.html "Post-Abortion Politics"] NOW with David Brancaccio on PBS</ref> No scientific research has demonstrated a direct [[causality|causal relationship]] between abortion and poor mental health,<ref name="Mooney"/><ref name=more-on-koop>{{cite journal |year=1990 |month=January/February |title=More on Koop's Study of Abortion
|journal=Family Planning Perspectives |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=36–39 |url=http://www.jstor.org/pss/2135437 |publisher=[[Guttmacher Institute]] |doi=10.2307/2135437}}</ref> though some studies have noted that there may be a [[statistical correlation]]. Pre-existing factors in a woman's life, such as emotional attachment to the pregnancy, lack of social support, pre-existing psychiatric illness, and conservative views on abortion increase the likelihood of experiencing negative feelings after an abortion.<ref name="APA89">{{cite journal |author=Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE |title=Psychological responses after abortion |journal=Science |volume=248 |issue=4951 |pages=41–4 |year=1990 |pmid=2181664 |doi=10.1126/science.2181664}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=S. |last=Edwards |year=1997 |month=July/August |title=Abortion study finds no long-term ill effects on emotional well-being |journal=Family Planning Perspectives |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3634/is_199707/ai_n8772240 |accessdate=2008-12-03 |doi=10.2307/2953388 |volume=29 |pages=193}}</ref>

In a 1990 review, the [[American Psychological Association]] (APA) found that "severe negative reactions [after abortion] are rare and are in line with those following other normal life stresses."<ref name=more-on-koop/> The APA revised and updated its findings in August 2008 to account for the accumulation of new evidence, and again concluded that induced abortion did not lead to increased mental health problems.<ref>[http://www.apa.org/releases/abortion-report.pdf Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion] APA (August 13, 2008)</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Benedict |last=Carey |date=2008-08-12 |title=Abortion Does Not Cause Mental Illness |work=[[New York Times]] |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/health/research/13brfs-ABORTIONDOES_BRF.html |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> As of August 2008, the United Kingdom [[Royal College of Psychiatrists]] is also performing a [[systematic review]] of the medical literature to update their position statement on the subject.

Some proposed negative [[psychological]] effects of abortion have been referred to by [[pro-life]] advocates as a separate condition called "post-abortion syndrome." However, the existence of "post-abortion syndrome" is not recognized by any medical or psychological organization,<ref name="Grimes">{{cite journal |author=Grimes DA, Creinin MD |title=Induced abortion: an overview for internists |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=140 |issue=8 |pages=620–6 |year=2004 |pmid=15096333 |doi=10.1001/archinte.140.5.620 |quote=Abortion does not lead to an increased risk for breast cancer or other late psychiatric or medical sequelae. …The alleged 'postabortion trauma syndrome' does not exist.}}</ref> and some [[physician]]s and [[pro-choice]] advocates have argued that the effort to popularize the idea of a "post-abortion syndrome" is a tactic used by pro-life advocates for political purposes.<ref name="Bazelon">{{cite news |first=Emily |last=Bazelon |authorlink=Emily Bazelon |date=2007-01-21 |title=Is There a Post-Abortion Syndrome? |work=[[New York Times Magazine]] |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/21/magazine/21abortion.t.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=5092fc3344065aec&ex=1327035600&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1190370959-M3NVF8bZOGTDu468IEZo8g |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref name="Mooney">{{cite journal |first=Chris |last=Mooney |authorlink=Chris Mooney |year=2004 |month=October |title=Research and Destroy: How the religious right promotes its own 'experts' to combat mainstream science |work=[[Washington Monthly]] |url=http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0410.mooney.html |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref name="stotlandreview">{{cite journal |author=Stotland NL |title=Abortion and psychiatric practice |journal=J Psychiatr Pract |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=139–49 |year=2003 |pmid=15985924 |doi=10.1097/00131746-200303000-00005 |quote=Currently, there are active attempts to convince the public and women considering abortion that abortion frequently has negative psychiatric consequences. This assertion is not borne out by the literature: the vast majority of women tolerate abortion without psychiatric sequelae.}}</ref><ref name="stotland_1404747">{{cite journal |author=Stotland NL |title=The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome |journal=JAMA |volume=268 |issue=15 |pages=2078–9 |year=1992 |month=October |pmid=1404747 |doi=10.1001/jama.268.15.2078}}</ref>

==Incidence of induced abortion==
The incidence and reasons for induced abortion vary regionally. It has been estimated that approximately 46 million abortions are performed worldwide every year. Of these, 26 million are said to occur in [[abortion law|places where abortion is legal]]; the other 20 million happen where the procedure is illegal. Some countries, such as Belgium (11.2 per 100 known pregnancies) and the Netherlands (10.6 per 100), have a low rate of induced abortion, while others like Russia (62.6 per 100) and [[Vietnam]] (43.7 per 100) have a comparatively high rate. The world ratio is 26 induced abortions per 100 known pregnancies.<ref>Henshaw, Stanley K., Singh, Susheela, & Haas, Taylor. (1999). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/25s3099.html The Incidence of Abortion Worldwide]. ''International Family Planning Perspectives, 25 (Supplement)'', 30 – 8. Retrieved 2006-01-18.</ref>

===By gestational age and method===
[[Image:UK abortion by gestational age 2004 histogram.svg|thumb|[[Histogram]] of abortions by [[gestational age]] in [[England and Wales]] during 2004. Average is 9.5 weeks.]]

Abortion rates also vary depending on the stage of [[pregnancy]] and the method practiced. In 2003, from data collected in those areas of the United States that sufficiently reported [[gestational age]], it was found that 88.2% of abortions were conducted at or prior to 12 weeks, 10.4% from 13 to 20 weeks, and 1.4% at or after 21 weeks. 90.9% of these were classified as having been done by "[[curettage]]" ([[Suction-aspiration abortion|suction-aspiration]], [[Dilation and curettage]], [[Dilation and evacuation]]), 7.7% by "[[medical abortion|medical]]" means ([[mifepristone]]), 0.4% by "[[instillation abortion|intrauterine instillation]]" ([[saline (medicine)|saline]] or [[prostaglandin]]), and 1.0% by "other" (including [[hysterotomy abortion|hysterotomy]] and [[hysterectomy]]).<ref name="cdc2003">Strauss, L.T., Gamble, S.B., Parker, W.Y, Cook, D.A., Zane, S.B., & Hamdan, S. (November 24, 2006). [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5511a1.htm Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2003]. ''Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55 (11),'' 1-32. Retrieved May 10, 2007.</ref> The [[Guttmacher Institute]] estimated there were 2,200 [[intact dilation and extraction]] procedures in the U.S. during 2000; this accounts for 0.17% of the total number of abortions performed that year.<ref>Finer, Lawrence B. & Henshaw, Stanley K. (2003). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3500603.html Abortion Incidence and Services in the United States in 2000]. ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35 (1).'' Retrieved 2006-05-10.</ref> Similarly, in England and Wales in 2006, 89% of terminations occurred at or under 12 weeks, 9% between 13 to 19 weeks, and 1.5% at or over 20 weeks. 64% of those reported were by vacuum aspiration, 6% by D&E, and 30% were medical.<ref>{{cite web |author=Department of Health |year=2007 |title=Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2006 |url=http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_075697 |accessdate=2007-10-12}}</ref> Later abortions are more common in China, India, and other developing countries than in developed countries.<ref>Cheng L. [http://www.who.int/rhl/fertility/abortion/CD006714_chengl_com/en/index.html “Surgical versus medical methods for second-trimester induced abortion : RHL commentary”] (last revised: 1 November 2008). The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.</ref>

===By personal and social factors===
[[Image:AGIAbortionReasonsBarChart.png|thumb|left|A [[bar chart]] depicting selected data from the 1998 [[Alan Guttmacher Institute|AGI]] [[meta-study]] on the reasons women stated for having an abortion.]]

A 1998 aggregated study, from 27 countries, on the reasons women seek to terminate their pregnancies concluded that common factors cited to have influenced the abortion decision were: desire to delay or end [[childbirth|childbearing]], concern over the interruption of [[employment|work]] or [[education]], issues of financial or relationship stability, and perceived immaturity.<ref name="bankole98">Bankole, Akinrinola, Singh, Susheela, & Haas, Taylor. (1998). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2411798.html Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 Countries]. ''International Family Planning Perspectives, 24 (3)'', 117-127 & 152. Retrieved 2006-01-18.</ref> A 2004 study in which American women at [[abortion clinic|clinics]] answered a [[questionnaire]] yielded similar results.<ref name="finer2005">Finer, Lawrence B., Frohwirth, Lori F., Dauphinee, Lindsay A., Singh, Shusheela, & Moore, Ann M. (2005). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantative and qualitative perspectives]. ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37 (3),'' 110-8. Retrieved 2006-01-18.</ref> In Finland and the United States, concern for the health risks posed by pregnancy in individual cases was not a factor commonly given; however, in [[Bangladesh]], India, and [[Kenya]] health concerns were cited by women more frequently as reasons for having an abortion.<ref name="bankole98"/> 1% of women in the 2004 survey-based U.S. study became pregnant as a result of [[rape]] and 0.5% as a result of [[incest]].<ref name="finer2005"/> Another American study in 2002 concluded that 54% of women who had an abortion were using a form of [[birth control|contraception]] at the time of becoming pregnant while 46% were not. Inconsistent use was reported by 49% of those using [[condom]]s and 76% of those using the [[combined oral contraceptive pill]]; 42% of those using condoms reported failure through slipping or breakage.<ref>Jones, Rachel K., Darroch, Jacqueline E., Henshaw, Stanley K. (2002). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3429402.pdf Contraceptive Use Among U.S. Women Having Abortions in 2000–2001]. ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34 (6).'' Retrieved June 15, 2006.</ref> The Guttmacher Institute estimated that "most abortions in the United States are obtained by minority women" because minority women "have much higher rates of unintended pregnancy."<ref>Susan A. Cohen: [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/11/3/gpr110302.html ''Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture''], Guttmacher Policy Review, Summer 2008, Volume 11, Number 3</ref>

Some abortions are undergone as the result of societal pressures. These might include the stigmatization of [[disabled]] persons, preference for children of a specific [[sex]], disapproval of [[single parent|single motherhood]], insufficient economic support for [[family|families]], lack of access to or rejection of contraceptive methods, or efforts toward [[population control]] (such as [[People's Republic of China|China's]] [[one-child policy]]). These factors can sometimes result in compulsory abortion or [[sex-selective abortion]].

==History of abortion==
[[Image:FrenchPeriodicalPills-January61845,BostonDailyTimes.jpg|thumb|right|"French Periodical Pills." An example of a clandestine advertisement published in an 1845 edition of the ''Boston Daily Times''.]]
{{main|History of abortion}}
Induced abortion can be traced to ancient times.<ref name="devereux">{{cite book |last=Devereux |first=G. |chapter=A typological study of abortion in 350 primitive, ancient, and pre-industrial societies |chapterurl=http://www.popline.org/docs/671051 |accessdate=2008-12-02 |editor=Harold Rosen |title=Abortion in America; medical, psychiatric, legal, anthropological, and religious considerations |year=1967 |location=[[Boston]] |publisher=[[Beacon Press]] |oclc=187445}}</ref> There is evidence to suggest that, historically, pregnancies were terminated through a number of methods, including the administration of [[abortifacient]] herbs, the use of sharpened implements, the application of abdominal pressure, and other techniques.

The [[Hippocratic Oath]], the chief statement of [[medical ethics]] for Hippocratic physicians in [[Ancient Greece]], forbade doctors from helping to procure an abortion by [[pessary]]. [[Soranus (Greek Physician)|Soranus]], a second-century Greek [[physician]], suggested in his work ''[[Gynaecology]]'' that women wishing to abort their pregnancies should engage in energetic exercise, energetic jumping, carrying heavy objects, and riding animals. He also prescribed a number of recipes for herbal baths, pessaries, and [[bloodletting]], but advised against the use of sharp instruments to induce miscarriage due to the risk of organ [[perforation]].<ref>{{cite book |first=Mary R. |last=Lefkowitz |authorlink=Mary Lefkowitz |coauthors=Maureen B. Fant |title=Women's life in Greece & Rome: a source book in translation |publisher=[[Johns Hopkins University Press]] |location=[[Baltimore]] |year=1992 |pages= |isbn=0-8018-4474-6 |oclc=25373320 |url=http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/ |accessdate=2008-12-02}}</ref> It is also believed that, in addition to using it as a [[contraceptive]], the ancient Greeks relied upon [[silphium]] as an [[abortifacient]]. Such folk remedies, however, varied in effectiveness and were not without risk. [[Tansy]] and [[pennyroyal]], for example, are two [[poison]]ous [[herbs]] with serious [[Adverse effect (medicine)|side effects]] that have at times been used to terminate pregnancy.

During the [[Islamic Golden Age|medieval period]], [[Medicine in medieval Islam|physicians in the Islamic world]] documented detailed and extensive lists of [[birth control]] practices, including the use of [[abortifacient]]s, commenting on their effectiveness and prevalence.<ref>{{citation|last=Sheikh|first=Sa'diyya|contribution=Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam|editor-first=Daniel C.|editor-last=Maguire|title=Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] US|year=2003|isbn=0195160010|pages=105-128 [105-6]}}</ref> They listed many different birth control substances in their medical encyclopedias, such as [[Avicenna]] listing 20 in ''[[The Canon of Medicine]]'' (1025) and [[Muhammad ibn Zakariya ar-Razi]] listing 176 in his ''Hawi'' (10th century). This was unparalleled in European medicine until the 19th century.<ref>{{citation|last=Sheikh|first=Sa'diyya|contribution=Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam|editor-first=Daniel C.|editor-last=Maguire|title=Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] US|year=2003|isbn=0195160010|pages=105-128 [115]}}</ref>

Abortion in the 19th century continued, despite bans in both the United Kingdom and the United States, as the disguised, but nonetheless open, advertisement of services in the [[Victorian era]] suggests.<ref>{{cite web |first=James |last=DeHullu |url=http://mysite.verizon.net/jdehullu/abortion/abhist.htm |accessdate=2008-12-02 |title=Histories of Abortion}}</ref>

In the 20th century the [[Soviet Union]] (1919), [[Iceland]] (1935) and Sweden (1938) were among the first countries to legalize certain or all forms of abortion.<ref name="cbctrust">{{cite web |url=<nowiki>http://www.cbctrust.com/history_law_religion.php</nowiki>{{Dead link|date=December 2008}} |title=Abortion Law, History & Religion |accessdate=2008-03-23 |work=Childbirth By Choice Trust}}</ref> In 1935 Nazi Germany, a law was passed permitting abortions for those deemed "hereditarily ill," while women considered of German stock were specifically prohibited from having abortions.<ref>{{cite book |last=Friedlander |first=Henry |authorlink=Henry Friedlander |title=The origins of Nazi genocide: from euthanasia to the final solution |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |location=Chapel Hill |year=1995 |page=[http://books.google.com/books?id=gqLDEKVk2nMC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA30,M1 30] |isbn=0-8078-4675-9 |oclc=60191622}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Robert |last=Proctor |authorlink=Robert N. Proctor |title=Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |location=[[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] |year=1988 |pages=122, 123 and 366 |isbn=0-674-74578-7 |oclc=20760638}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Margaret L. |last=Arnot |authorlink=Margaret McLean |coauthors=Cornelie Usborne |title=Gender and Crime in Modern Europe |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |year=1999 |page=231 |isbn=1-85728-745-2 |oclc=186748539}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=DiMeglio |first=Peter M. |editor=Helen Tierney |encyclopedia=Women's studies encyclopedia |title=Germany 1933-1945 (National Socialism) |year=1999 |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=[[Westport, Connecticut]] |isbn=0-313-31072-6 |oclc=38504469 |pages=[http://books.google.com/books?id=gQLqRd7hJq0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA589,M1 589]}}</ref>

==Social issues==
===Sex-selective abortion===
{{Main|Sex-selective abortion and infanticide}}

The advent of both [[Medical ultrasonography|sonography]] and [[amniocentesis]] has allowed parents to determine [[sex]] before [[childbirth|birth]]. This has led to the occurrence of [[sex-selective abortion and infanticide|sex-selective abortion]] or the targeted termination of a [[fetus]] based upon its sex.

It is suggested that sex-selective abortion might be partially responsible for the noticeable disparities between the [[birth rate]]s of male and female children in some places. The preference for male children is reported in many areas of Asia, and abortion used to limit female births has been reported in [[Mainland China]], [[Republic of China|Taiwan]], South Korea, and India.<ref>Banister, Judith. (1999-03-16). [http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/ebspr96a.html Son Preference in Asia - Report of a Symposium]. Retrieved 2006-01-12.</ref>

In India, the [[economic]] role of men, the costs associated with [[dowry|dowries]], and a [[Hindu]] tradition which dictates that [[funeral|funeral rites]] must be performed by a male relative have led to a [[culture|cultural]] preference for [[son]]s.<ref>Mutharayappa, Rangamuthia, Kim Choe, Minja, Arnold, Fred, & Roy, T.K. (1997). [http://www2.eastwestcenter.org/pop/misc/subj-3.pdf Son Preferences and Its Effect on Fertility in India]. ''National Family Health Survey Subject Reports, Number 3.'' Retrieved 2006-01-12.</ref> The widespread availability of diagnostic testing, during the 1970s and '80s, led to advertisements for services which read, "Invest 500 [[rupee]]s &#91;for a sex test&#93; now, save 50,000 rupees &#91;for a dowry&#93; later."<ref>{{cite journal |first=Rita |last=Patel |year=1996 |month=Fall |title=The practice of sex selective abortion in India: May you be the mother of a hundred sons |journal=Carolina Papers in International Health and Development |volume=7 |url=http://cgi.unc.edu/research/pdf/abortion.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> In 1991, the male-to-female [[human sex ratio|sex ratio]] in India was skewed from its biological norm of 105 to 100, to an average of 108 to 100.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Sudha |first=S. |coauthors=S. Irudaya Rajan |year=1999 |month=July |title=Female Demographic Disadvantage in India 1981-1991: Sex Selective Abortions and Female Infanticide |journal=Development and Change |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=585–618 |doi=10.1111/1467-7660.00130 |url=http://web.archive.org/web/20030101210623/http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/organizations/healthnet/gender/docs/sudha.html |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> Researchers have asserted that between 1985 and 2005 as many as 10 million female fetuses may have been selectively aborted.<ref>{{cite news |first=Patricia |last=Reaney |publisher=[[Reuters]] |url=http://web.archive.org/web/20060220072756/http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L06779563.htm |title=Selective abortion blamed for India's missing girls |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> The Indian government passed an official ban of pre-natal sex screening in 1994 and moved to pass a complete ban of sex-selective abortion in 2002.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Mudur |first=Ganapati |year=2002 |title=India plans new legislation to prevent sex selection |journal=[[BMJ]] |volume=324 |issue=7334 |pages=385b |doi=10.1136/bmj.324.7334.385/b}}</ref>

In the People's Republic of China, there is also a historic son preference. The implementation of the [[one-child policy]] in 1979, in response to population concerns, led to an increased disparity in the sex ratio as parents attempted to circumvent the law through sex-selective abortion or the abandonment of unwanted daughters.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Maureen J. |last=Graham |coauthors=Ulla Larsen and Xiping Xu |year=1998 |month=June |title=Son Preference in Anhui Province, China |journal=International Family Planning Perspectives |volume=24 |issue=2 |url=http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2407298.html |accessdate=2008-12-03 |doi=10.2307/2991929 |pages=72}}</ref> Sex-selective abortion might be an influence on the shift from the baseline male-to-female birth rate to an elevated national rate of 117:100 reported in 2002. The trend was more pronounced in rural regions: as high as 130:100 in [[Guangdong]] and 135:100 in [[Hainan]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Plafker |first=Ted |year=2002 |month=May |title=Sex selection in China sees 117 boys born for every 100 girls |journal=[[BMJ]] |volume=324 |issue=7348 |pages=1233a |doi=10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1233/a |pmid=12028966}}</ref> A ban upon the practice of sex-selective abortion was enacted in 2003.<ref>"[http://www.china.org.cn/english/2003/Mar/59194.htm China Bans Sex-selection Abortion]." (2002-03-22). ''Xinhua News Agency.'' Retrieved 2006-01-12.</ref>

===Unsafe abortion===
[[Image:RussianAbortionPoster.jpg|thumb|left|[[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[Propaganda|poster]] circa 1925, promoting hospital abortions. Title translation: "Abortions performed by either trained or self-taught midwives not only maim the woman, they also often lead to death."]]
{{main|Unsafe abortion}}
Women seeking to terminate their pregnancies sometimes resort to unsafe methods, particularly where and when access to legal abortion is being barred.

The [[World Health Organization]] (WHO) defines an unsafe abortion as being "a procedure...carried out by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both."<ref name="whounsafe"/> Unsafe abortions are known colloquially as "back-alley" abortions.<ref>{{cite web |first=Jill |last=Stanek |date=2006-08-09 |title=Miami: The legalized back-alley abortion capital |work=[[WorldNetDaily]] |url=http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51451 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref> This can include a person without medical training, a professional health provider operating in sub-standard conditions, or [[self-induced abortion|the woman herself]].

Unsafe abortion remains a [[public health]] concern today due to the higher incidence and severity of its associated complications, such as incomplete abortion, [[sepsis]], [[hemorrhage]], and damage to internal organs. WHO estimates that 19 million unsafe abortions occur around the world annually and that 68,000 of these result in the woman's death.<ref name="whounsafe">World Health Organization. (2004). <nowiki>http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/unsafe_abortion_estimates_04/estimates.pdf</nowiki>{{Dead link|date=December 2008}} Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000. Retrieved 2006-01-12.</ref> Complications of unsafe abortion are said to account, globally, for approximately 13% of all [[maternal death|maternal mortalities]], with regional estimates including 12% in Asia, 25% in [[Latin America]], and 13% in [[sub-Saharan Africa]].<ref>Salter, C., Johnson, H.B., and Hengen, N. (1997). [http://www.infoforhealth.org/pr/l10edsum.shtml Care for postabortion complications: saving women's lives]. ''Population Reports, 25 (1).'' Retrieved 2006-02-22.</ref> A 2007 study published in the ''[[The Lancet]]'' found that, although the global rate of abortion declined from 45.6 million in 1995 to 41.6 million in 2003, unsafe procedures still accounted for 48% of all abortions performed in 2003.<ref name="Worldwide"/> [[Health education]], access to [[family planning]], and improvements in [[health care]] during and after abortion have been proposed to address this phenomenon.<ref>World Health Organization. (1998). [http://www.who.int/docstore/world-health-day/en/pages1998/whd98_10.html Address Unsafe Abortion]. Retrieved 2006-03-01.</ref>

==Abortion debate==
{{Refimprovesect|date=November 2008}}
[[Image:March for Women's Lives detail.jpg|thumb|right|Pro-choice activists near the [[Washington Monument]] at the [[March for Women's Lives]].]]
[[Image:March for life 2007.JPG|thumb|right|Pro-life activists at the [[March for Life]] in 2007. The rally is held annually in [[Washington, DC]].]]
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[Image:P1020321.JPG|thumb|right|Pro-life activists at the [[March for Life]] in 2008. The rally is held annually in [[Washington, DC]].]] -->
{{main|Abortion debate|Pro-choice|Pro-life}}
In the [[history of abortion]], induced abortion has been the source of considerable [[debate]], [[controversy]], and [[activism]]. An [[opinion|individual's position]] on the complex [[ethical]], [[moral]], [[philosophical]], [[Biology|biological]], and [[legal]] issues is often related to his or her [[value system]]. Opinions of abortion may be best described as being a combination of beliefs on its morality, and beliefs on the responsibility, ethical scope, and proper extent of [[government]]al [[authority|authorities]] in [[Policy|public policy]]. [[religion|Religious ethics]] also has an influence upon both personal opinion and the greater debate over abortion (see [[religion and abortion]]).

Abortion debates, especially pertaining to [[abortion law]]s, are often spearheaded by [[advocacy|advocacy groups]] belonging to one of two camps. In the United States, most often those in favor of greater legal restrictions on, or even complete prohibition of abortion, describe themselves as [[pro-life]] while those against legal restrictions on abortion describe themselves as [[pro-choice]]. Generally, the pro-life position argues that a human fetus is a [[human being]] with the [[right to life|right to live]] making abortion tantamount to [[murder]]. The pro-choice position argues that a woman has certain [[reproductive rights]], especially the choice whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.

In both public and private debate, arguments presented in favor of or against abortion focus on either the moral permissibility of an induced abortion, or justification of [[laws]] permitting or restricting abortion.

Debate also focuses on whether the [[pregnancy|pregnant]] woman should have to notify and/or have the [[consent]] of others in distinct cases: a [[minor (law)|minor]], her parents; a [[marriage|legally married]] or [[common-law marriage|common-law]] wife, her husband; or a pregnant woman, the biological father. In a 2003 Gallup poll in the United States, 79% of male and 67% of female respondents were in favor of spousal notification; overall support was 72% with 26% opposed.<ref>The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2005-11-02). "[http://people-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=122 Public Opinion Supports Alito on Spousal Notification Even as It Favors Roe v. Wade]." ''Pew Research Center Pollwatch.'' Retrieved 2006-03-01.</ref>

===Public opinion===
{{Main|Societal attitudes towards abortion}}

A number of [[opinion poll]]s around the world have explored [[public opinion]] regarding the issue of abortion. Results have varied from poll to poll, country to country, and region to region, while varying with regard to different aspects of the issue.

A May 2005 survey examined attitudes toward abortion in 10 European countries, asking polltakers whether they agreed with the statement, "If a woman doesn't want children, she should be allowed to have an abortion". The highest level of approval was 81% (in the Czech Republic); the lowest was 47% (in Poland).<ref>TNS Sofres. (May 2005). [http://www.thebrusselsconnection.be/tbc/upload/attachments/European%20Values%20Overall%20EN.pdf European Values]. Retrieved January 11, 2007.</ref>

In North America, a December 2001 poll surveyed [[Abortion in Canada#Opinion polls|Canadian opinion on abortion]], asking [[Canada|Canadians]] in what circumstances they believe abortion should be permitted; 32% responded that they believe abortion should be legal in all circumstances, 52% that it should be legal in certain circumstances, and 14% that it should be legal in no circumstances. A similar poll in January 2006 surveyed people in the United States about [[Abortion in the United States#Public Opinion|U.S. opinion on abortion]]; 33% said that abortion should be "permitted only in cases such as rape, incest or to save the woman's life", 27% said that abortion should be "permitted in all cases", 15% that it should be "permitted, but subject to greater restrictions than it is now", 17% said that it should "only be permitted to save the woman's life", and 5% said that it should "never" be permitted.<ref>''[http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm The Polling Report].'' (2006). Retrieved 2006-01-11.</ref> A November 2005 poll in Mexico found that 73.4% think abortion should not be legalized while 11.2% think it should.<ref>{{cite web |title=Mexicans Support Status Quo on Social Issues |publisher=[[Angus Reid Global Monitor]] |date=2005-12-01 |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/10042 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref>

Of attitudes in [[South America]], a December 2003 survey found that 30% of [[Argentina|Argentines]] thought that [[abortion in Argentina]] should be allowed "regardless of situation", 47% that it should be allowed "under some circumstances", and 23% that it should not be allowed "regardless of situation".<ref>{{cite web |title=Argentines Assess Abortion Changes |publisher=[[Angus Reid Global Monitor]] |date=2004-03-04 |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/2029 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref> A March 2007 poll regarding the [[Abortion in Brazil|abortion law in Brazil]] found that 65% of [[Brazil]]ians believe that it "should not be modified", 16% that it should be expanded "to allow abortion in other cases", 10% that abortion should be "decriminalized", and 5% were "not sure".<ref>{{cite web |title=Brazilians Want to Keep Abortion as Crime |publisher=[[Angus Reid Global Monitor]] |date=2007-04-12 |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/15370 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref> A July 2005 poll in [[Colombia]] found that 65.6% said they thought that abortion should remain illegal, 26.9% that it should be made legal, and 7.5% that they were unsure.<ref>{{cite web |title=Colombians Reject Legalizing Abortion |publisher=[[Angus Reid Global Monitor]] |date=2005-08-02 |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/8333 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref>

===Selected issues of the abortion debate===
====Breast cancer hypothesis====
{{main|Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis}}
The abortion-breast cancer hypothesis (supporters call it the abortion-breast cancer link) posits that induced abortion increases the risk of developing [[breast cancer]];<ref name="RUSSO_505">{{cite journal |author=Russo J, Russo I |title=Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence |journal=Am J Pathol |volume=100 |issue=2 |pages=505–506 |year=1980 |pmid=6773421 |quote=In contrast, abortion is associated with increased risk of carcinomas of the breast. The explanation for these epidemiologic findings is not known, but the parallelism between the DMBA-induced rat mammary carcinoma model and the human situation is striking. …Abortion would interrupt this process, leaving in the gland undifferentiated structures like those observed in the rat mammary gland, which could render the gland again susceptible to carcinogenesis.}}</ref> it has been a controversial subject but the current [[scientific consensus]] has concluded that there is no significant association between first-trimester abortion and breast cancer risk.<ref name="WHO">{{cite web |url=http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs240/en/index.html |title=Induced abortion does not increase breast cancer risk |year=2000 |month=June |accessdate=2007-12-24 |format= |publisher=[[World Health Organization]]}}</ref><ref name="rcog_2000">{{cite book |title=The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion |origyear=2000 |url=http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/induced_abortionfull.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2008-12-05 |series=Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 7 |year=2004 |month=September |publisher=[[Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists]] |isbn=1-904752-06-3 |oclc=263585758 |page=43 |author=[[Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists]]}}</ref><ref name="oversight">{{cite web |url=http://oversight.house.gov/features/politics_and_science/example_breast_cancer.htm |title=Breast Cancer Risks |accessdate=2008-04-14 |publisher=[[United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform]]}}</ref><ref name="JASEN">{{cite journal |author=Koba S, Nowak S |title=[A case of acute bacterial dysentery with cerebrospinal meningitis] |language=Polish |journal=Wiadomości lekarskie |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=221–3 |year=1976 |month=February |pmid=1251638 |doi= |url= |accessdate=2008-12-05 |issn=0043-5147}}</ref>

In early [[pregnancy]], levels of [[estrogen]] increase, leading to [[breast]] growth in preparation for [[lactation]]. The hypothesis proposes that if this process is interrupted by an abortion{{ndash}} before full maturity in the third [[trimester]]{{ndash}} then more relatively vulnerable immature cells could be left than there were prior to the pregnancy, resulting in a greater potential risk of breast cancer. The hypothesis mechanism was first proposed and explored in [[rat]] studies conducted in the 1980s.<ref name="RUSSO">{{cite journal |author=Russo J, Russo IH |title=Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence |journal=Am. J. Pathol. |volume=100 |issue=2 |pages=497–512 |year=1980 |month=August |pmid=6773421 |pmc=1903536 |doi= |url= |accessdate=2008-12-05}}</ref><ref name="RUSSO2">{{cite journal |author=Russo J, Tay L, Russo I |title=Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis |journal=Breast Cancer Research and Treatment |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=5–73 |year=1982 |pmid=6216933 |doi=10.1007/BF01805718}}</ref><ref name="RUSSO3">{{cite journal |author=Russo J, Russo I |title=Biological and molecular bases of mammary carcinogenesis |journal=Laboratory Investigation |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=112–37 |year=1987 |pmid=3302534 |issn=0023-6837}}</ref>

====Fetal pain debate====
{{Main | Fetal pain}}
Fetal pain, its existence, and its implications are part of a larger debate about abortion. Many researchers in the area of fetal development believe that a fetus is unlikely to feel pain until after the seventh month of pregnancy.<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/ "Study: Fetus feels no pain until third trimester"], Associated Press via MSNBC (2005-08-24). Retrieved 2008-04-13.</ref><ref Developmental [[neurobiology|neurobiologists]] suspect that the establishment of [[Human thalamus|thalamocortical]] connections (at about 26 weeks) may be critical to fetal perception of pain.<ref name="Johnson">Johnson, Martin and Everitt, Barry. ''[http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0632042877&id=MzZRuSQ5UeEC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&ots=cx0KcmuOYk&dq=%22emerging+consensus+among+developmental+neurobiologists+that+the+establishment+%22&num=100&sig=8I9DY9KPpuSPNYvGI3sEV2bmKsA Essential reproduction]'' Retrieved 2007-02-21.</ref> However, legislation has been proposed by [[pro-life]] advocates requiring abortion providers to tell a woman that the fetus may feel pain during an abortion procedure.<ref>Weisman, Jonathan. "[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/04/AR2006120401089.html House to Consider Abortion Anesthesia Bill]", ''Washington Post'' 2006-12-05. Retrieved 2007-02-06.</ref>

A review by researchers from the [[University of California, San Francisco]] in ''[[Journal of the American Medical Association|JAMA]]'' concluded that data from dozens of medical reports and studies indicate that fetuses are unlikely to feel pain until the [[third trimester]] of pregnancy.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Lee SJ, Ralston HJ, Drey EA, Partridge JC, Rosen MA |title=Fetal pain: a systematic multidisciplinary review of the evidence |journal=JAMA |volume=294 |issue=8 |pages=947–54 |year=2005 |pmid=16118385 |doi=10.1001/jama.294.8.947}}</ref><ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/ "Study: Fetus feels no pain until third trimester"] MSNBC</ref> There is an emerging consensus among developmental [[neurobiology|neurobiologists]] that the establishment of [[Human thalamus|thalamocortical]] connections (at about 26 weeks) is a critical event with regard to fetal perception of pain.<ref>Johnson, Martin and Everitt, Barry. ''[http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0632042877&id=MzZRuSQ5UeEC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&ots=cx0KcmuOYk&dq=%22emerging+consensus+among+developmental+neurobiologists+that+the+establishment+%22&num=100&sig=8I9DY9KPpuSPNYvGI3sEV2bmKsA Essential reproduction]'' (Blackwell 2000), p. 215. Retrieved 2007-02-21.</ref> Because pain can involve sensory, emotional and cognitive factors, it may be "impossible to know" when painful experiences are perceived, even if it is known when thalamocortical connections are established.<ref>Johnson, Martin and Everitt, Barry. ''[http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0632042877&id=MzZRuSQ5UeEC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&ots=cx0KcmuOYk&dq=%22emerging+consensus+among+developmental+neurobiologists+that+the+establishment+%22&num=100&sig=8I9DY9KPpuSPNYvGI3sEV2bmKsA Essential reproduction]'' (Blackwell 2000): ''"The multidimensionality of pain perception, involving sensory, emotional, and cognitive factors may in itself be the basis of conscious, painful experience, but it will remain difficult to attribute this to a fetus at any particular developmental age."'' Retrieved 2007-02-21.</ref>

====Effect upon crime rate====
{{Main|Legalized abortion and crime effect}}

A theory attempts to draw a [[correlation]] between the United States' unprecedented nationwide decline of the overall [[crime rate]] during the 1990s and the decriminalization of abortion 20 years prior.

The suggestion was brought to widespread attention by a 1999 [[academic paper]], ''[[The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime]]'', authored by the [[economist]]s [[Steven Levitt|Steven D. Levitt]] and John Donohue. They attributed the drop in crime to a reduction in individuals said to have a higher statistical probability of committing crimes: unwanted children, especially those born to mothers who are [[African-American]], [[poverty|impoverished]], [[teenage pregnancy|adolescent]], [[education|uneducated]], and [[single parent|single]]. The change coincided with what would have been the adolescence, or peak years of potential criminality, of those who had not been born as a result of ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' and similar cases. Donohue and Levitt's study also noted that states which legalized abortion before the rest of the nation experienced the lowering crime rate pattern earlier, and those with higher abortion rates had more pronounced reductions.<ref>{{cite journal |first=John J. |last=Donohue |coauthors=[[Steven Levitt]] |year=2001 |month=May |title=[[The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime]] |journal=[[Quarterly Journal of Economics]] |volume=116 |issue=2 |pages=379–420 |doi=10.1162/00335530151144050 |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref>

Fellow economists Christopher Foote and Christopher Goetz criticized the [[methodology]] in the Donohue-Levitt study, noting a lack of accommodation for statewide yearly variations such as [[cocaine]] use, and recalculating based on incidence of crime [[per capita]]; they found no [[statistically significant]] results.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Foote |first=Christopher L. |year=2008 |month=February |title=The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime: Comment |journal=[[Quarterly Journal of Economics]] |volume=123 |issue=1 |pages=407–423 |doi=10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.407 |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref> Levitt and Donohue responded to this by presenting an adjusted [[data set]] which took into account these concerns and reported that the data maintained the statistical significance of their initial paper.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Donohue |first=John J. |year=2008 |month=February |title=Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz |journal=[[Quarterly Journal of Economics]] |volume=123 |issue=1 |pages=425–440 |doi=10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.425 |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref>

Such research has been criticized by some as being [[Utilitarianism|utilitarian]], [[discrimination|discriminatory]] as to [[Race (classification of human beings)|race]] and [[social class|socioeconomic class]], and as promoting [[eugenic]]s as a solution to [[crime]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Crime-Abortion Study Continues to Draw Pro-life Backlash |date=1999-08-11 |publisher=The Pro-Life Infonet |url=http://ohioroundtable.org/library/articles/life/crimeabortion.html |work=Ohio Roundtable Online Library |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=J.B.F. |url=http://www.americancatholic.org/Messenger/Jan2000/Editorial.asp |title=Abortion and the Lower Crime Rate |year=2000 |month=January |work=St. Anthony Messenger |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref> Levitt states in his book ''[[Freakonomics]]'' that they are neither promoting nor negating any course of action&mdash;merely reporting data as economists.

===Mexico City Policy===
{{Main|Mexico City Policy}}
The Mexico City policy, also known as the "Global Gag Rule" requires any [[non-governmental organization]] receiving US Government funding to refrain from performing or promoting abortion services in other countries. This has had a significant affect on the health policies of many nations across the globe. The Mexico City Policy was instituted under [[President Reagan]], suspended under [[President Clinton]], and reinstated by [[President George W. Bush]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Reproductive Rights in a Global Context |last= Knudsen |first=Lara |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=2006 |publisher= Vanderbilt University Press |location= |isbn=0826515282, 9780826515285 |page=7 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=b3thCcdyScsC&dq=reproductive+rights&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 }}</ref> [[President Barack Obama]] suspended the policy on January 24, 2009. <ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7847651.stm |title=Obama lifts ban on abortion funds |accessdate=2009-01-24 |work= |publisher=BBC News |date=2009-01-24 }}</ref>

===Religious Views===
{{main|Religion and abortion}}

==Abortion law==
{{main|Abortion law|History of abortion law}}
{{see also|Reproductive rights}}
[[File:AbortionLawsMap-NoLegend.png|thumb|right|250px|International status of abortion law: {{legend|#3f9bbb|Legal on request}}
{{legend|#d4df5a|Legal for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, socioeconomic factors, and/or fetal defects}}
{{legend|#64513B|Legal for or illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, fetal defects, and/or mental health}}
{{legend|#FA7014|Illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, and/or mental health}}
{{legend|#cc7662|Illegal with exception for maternal life, health, and/or mental health}}
{{legend|#3236D3|Illegal with no exceptions}}
{{legend|#2F2F2F|Varies by region}}
{{legend|#B3B3B3|No information}}
Vertical stripes (various colours): Illegal but unenforced]]

Before the scientific discovery in the nineteenth century that human development begins at [[human fertilization|fertilization]],<ref>Garrison, Fielding. [http://books.google.com/books?id=JvoIAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA567&dq=fetilization+was+discovered+hertwig&num=100&ei=nQiGSYDYGouiyATyvuSnDQ#PPA567,M1 An Introduction to the History of Medicine,] pages 566-567 (Saunders 1921).</ref> [[English common law]] forbade abortions after "[[quickening]]”, that is, after “an infant is able to stir in the mother's womb.”<ref>{{cite book |first=William |last=Blackstone |authorlink=William Blackstone |chapter=Amendment IX, Document 1 |chapterurl=http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendIXs1.html |title=[[Commentaries on the Laws of England]] |origyear=1765 |year=1979 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |volume=5 |page=388}}</ref> There was also an earlier period in England when abortion was prohibited "if the foetus is already formed" but not yet quickened.<ref>{{cite book |author=[[Henry de Bracton]] |chapter=The crime of homicide and the divisions into which it falls |editor=George E. Woodbine ed.; Samuel Edmund Thorne trans. |title=On the Laws and Customs of England |origyear={{circa|1250}} |year=1968 |accessdate=2008-12-11 |volume=2 |page=[http://hlsl5.law.harvard.edu/bracton/Unframed/English/v2/341.htm 341] |oclc=1872}}</ref> Both pre- and post-quickening abortions were criminalized by ''[[Lord Ellenborough's Act]]'' in 1803.<ref>[http://members.aol.com/abtrbng/lea.htm Lord Ellenborough’s Act]." (1998). ''The Abortion Law Homepage.'' Retrieved February 20, 2007.</ref> In 1861, the [[British Parliament]] passed the ''[[Offences Against The Person Act 1861|Offences Against the Person Act]]'', which continued to outlaw abortion and served as a model for similar prohibitions in some other nations.<ref>United Nations Population Division. (2002). [http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion Abortion Policies: A Global Review]. Retrieved February 22, 2007.</ref>

The [[Soviet Union]], with legislation in 1920, and [[Iceland]], with legislation in 1935, were two of the first countries to generally allow abortion. The second half of the 20th century saw the liberalization of abortion laws in other countries. The ''[[Abortion Act 1967]]'' allowed abortion for limited reasons in the United Kingdom. In the 1973 case, ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'', the [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] struck down state laws banning abortion, ruling that such laws violated an implied [[right to privacy]] in the [[United States Constitution]]. The [[Supreme Court of Canada]], similarly, in the case of ''[[R. v. Morgentaler]]'', discarded its criminal code regarding abortion in 1988, after ruling that such restrictions violated the security of person guaranteed to women under the ''[[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]''. Canada later struck down provincial regulations of abortion in the case of ''[[R. v. Morgentaler (1993)]].'' By contrast, [[abortion in Ireland]] was affected by the addition of an [[Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland|amendment]] to the [[Republic of Ireland|Irish]] [[Constitution of Ireland|Constitution]] in 1983 by popular [[referendum]], recognizing "the right to life of the unborn".

Current laws pertaining to abortion are diverse. Religious, moral, and cultural sensibilities continue to influence abortion laws throughout the world. The [[right to life]], the right to [[liberty]], the right to [[security of person]], and the right to [[Reproductive rights|reproductive health]] are major issues of [[human rights]] that are sometimes used as justification for the existence or absence of laws controlling abortion. Many countries in which abortion is legal require that certain criteria be met in order for an abortion to be obtained, often, but not always, using a [[trimester]]-based system to regulate the window of legality:
*In the United States, some states impose a 24-hour waiting period before the procedure, prescribe the distribution of information on [[prenatal development|fetal development]], or require that [[minors and abortion|parents be contacted]] if their [[Minor (law)|minor]] daughter requests an abortion.<ref>[http://www.lawserver.com/abortion Interactive maps comparing U.S. abortion restrictions by state] LawServer</ref>
*In the United Kingdom, as in some other countries, two doctors must first certify that an abortion is medically or socially necessary before it can be performed.

Other countries, in which abortion is normally illegal, will allow one to be performed in the case of [[rape]], [[incest]], or danger to the pregnant woman's life or health. A few nations ban abortion entirely: [[Abortion in Chile|Chile]], [[El Salvador]], [[Malta]], Ireland and [[Abortion in Nicaragua|Nicaragua]], although in 2006 the [[Politics of Chile|Chilean government]] began the free distribution of [[emergency contraception]].<ref>Ross, Jen. (September 12, 2006). "[http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0912/p01s04-woam.html In Chile, free morning-after pills to teens]." ''The Christian Science Monitor.'' Retrieved 2006-12-07.</ref><ref>Gallardoi, Eduardo. (September 26, 2006). "[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092600770.html Morning-After Pill Causes Furor in Chile]." ''The Washington Post.'' Retrieved 2006-12-07. </ref> In [[Bangladesh]], abortion is illegal, but the government has long supported a network of "menstrual regulation clinics", where [[menstrual extraction]] ([[manual vacuum aspiration]]) can be performed as menstrual hygiene.<ref>{{cite web|title=Surgical Abortion: History and Overview|publisher=National Abortion Federation|accessdate=2006-09-04|url=http://www.prochoice.org/education/resources/surg_history_overview.html}}</ref>

In places where abortion is illegal or carries heavy social stigma, pregnant women may engage in [[medical tourism]] and travel to countries where they can terminate their pregnancy. In the USA, it is not unusual for women to travel from one state to another for reasons of termination of pregnancy.

==See also==
*[[Abortion fund]]
*[[Anti-abortion violence]]
*[[Eugenics]]
*[[Fetal rights]]
*[[Late-term abortion]]
*[[Mexico City Policy]]
*[[Minors and abortion]]
*[[Paternal rights and abortion]]
*[[Population control]]
*[[Self-induced abortion]]
*[[Stem cell controversy]]

==References==
<!-- ----------------------------------------------------------
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a
discussion of different citation methods and how to generate
footnotes using the<ref>, </ref> and <reference /> tags
----------------------------------------------------------- -->
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

==External links==
{{sisterlinks|abortion}}
*{{dmoz|Society/Issues/Abortion/|Abortion}}
*[http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion Abortion Policies: A Global Review]
*[http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002912.htm#Definition MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia: Abortion]
<!-- HELP KEEP THIS ARTICLE SHORT AND SIMPLE: ADD LINKS TO WHICHEVER SUB-ARTICLE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE INSTEAD OF HERE. ALSO, PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT SITES CONTAINING SHOCK MATERIAL SHALL IN NO CASE BE ACCEPTED. THANKS!!-->

'''The following information resources may be created by those with a non-neutral position in the abortion debate:'''
*[http://www.guttmacher.org/ The Guttmacher Institute]
*[http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion Johnston's Archive: Abortion Statistics and Other Data]

{{Template group
| list =
{{Birth control methods}}
{{Particular human rights}}
{{Reproductive health}}
}}

[[Category:Abortion]]
[[Category:Reproduction]]
[[Category:Core issues in ethics]]
[[Category:Gynecology]]
[[Category:Pregnancy]]
[[Category:Obstetrics]]
[[Category:Gender studies]]
[[Category:Fertility]]

[[ar:إجهاض]]
[[ast:Albuertu]]
[[az:Abort]]
[[bn:গর্ভপাত]]
[[bs:Pobačaj]]
[[bg:Аборт]]
[[ca:Avortament]]
[[cs:Interrupce]]
[[da:Provokeret abort]]
[[de:Schwangerschaftsabbruch]]
[[et:Abort]]
[[el:Έκτρωση]]
[[es:Aborto inducido]]
[[eo:Aborto]]
[[eu:Haurgaltze]]
[[fa:سقط جنین]]
[[fo:Fosturtøka]]
[[fr:Avortement]]
[[gl:Aborto]]
[[ko:낙태]]
[[hr:Pobačaj]]
[[id:Gugur kandungan]]
[[ia:Aborto]]
[[is:Fóstureyðing]]
[[it:Aborto]]
[[he:הפלה מלאכותית]]
[[jv:Abortus]]
[[pam:Abortion]]
[[ka:აბორტი]]
[[sw:Utoaji mimba]]
[[ku:Zarokjiberbirin]]
[[la:Abortus]]
[[lt:Abortas]]
[[hu:Terhességmegszakítás]]
[[mk:Абортус]]
[[ms:Pengguguran]]
[[nl:Abortus]]
[[ja:人工妊娠中絶]]
[[no:Abort]]
[[nn:Abort]]
[[pl:Aborcja]]
[[pt:Aborto]]
[[ro:Avort]]
[[qu:Sulluchiy]]
[[ru:Искусственный аборт]]
[[sq:Dështimi i zhvillimit të fetusit]]
[[simple:Abortion]]
[[sk:Interrupcia]]
[[sl:Splav]]
[[sr:Побачај]]
[[sh:Abortus]]
[[fi:Abortti]]
[[sv:Abort]]
[[tl:Pagpapalaglag]]
[[ta:கருக்கலைப்பு]]
[[te:గర్భస్రావం]]
[[th:การแท้ง]]
[[tr:Kürtaj]]
[[tk:Abort]]
[[uk:Аборт]]
[[ur:اسقاط (حمل)]]
[[yi:אבארטאציע]]
[[zh-yue:落仔]]
[[zh:堕胎]]

Revision as of 14:06, 17 February 2009

It's murder

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abortion&oldid=271340335"