An Apologeticall Narration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

An Apologeticall Narration, Hvmbly svbmitted to the Honourable Houses of Parliament. By Tho: Goodwin, Philip Nye, Sidrach Simpson, Jer: Burroughes, William Bridge. London, Printed for Robert Dawlman, M.DC.XLIII. [1643] was a theological tract submitted by five Independent preachers to the English Parliament on 3 January 1644 as a part of the debates taking place during the Westminster Assembly.

An Apologeticall Narration was written by Thomas Goodwin, Philip Nye, Sidrach Simpson, Jeremiah Burroughs and William Bridge sometimes referred to collectively as the "Five Dissenting Brethren".[1]The five authors had all been exiled in Holland in the 1630s and had links to the New England churches.

The pamphlet can be seen as a manifesto of congregationalism, where churches would be independently organised, although maintaining fraternal links. The two biggest evils for these Congregationalists (or Independents) were sectarianism and intolerance (although there were some limits to tolerance).[2] But while arguing for some measure of congregationalist independence, the pamphlet also aimed to reassure the presbyterian majority that the gathering of independent churches was not about to create ecclesiastical disorder. Thus it was not necessary to secure uniformity in the new constitution of the Church of England. This conciliatory tone accounts for the harsh judgements on the separatists and the Brownists.[3]

Despite the book deliberately seeking a moderate, indeed 'apologeticall', tone, it launched an enormous amount of printed debate that definitively split the godly community into the presbyterian and independent factions.[4] This included a rebuttal by Adam Steuart, published in February.[5]

Veronica Wedgwood argues that by submitting the tract direct to Parliament, rather than the Westminster Assembly, this was an effective way of bringing their point of view to a wider public without exposing it to controversy in the Assembly, where it would have faced being out-argued and they themselves would have been outnumbered.[6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Stewart, Angus. "The Westminster Confession and Church Unity". Covenant Protestant Reformed Church. Retrieved 13 September 2013. 
  2. ^ Rose, Jaqueline (2011).Godly Kingship in Restoration England: The Politics of The Royal Supremacy, 1660–1688 CUP. ISBN 9781139499675 . p.80
  3. ^ eds. Jones, Robert Tudur; Dix, Kenneth; Ruston; Alan (2007). Protestant Nonconformist Texts: 1550 to 1700 vol. 1. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 9780754638643. p.151
  4. ^ Shagan, Ethan H. The Case of An Apologeticall Narration in eds. Taylor, Stephen and Tapsell, Grant (2013) The Nature of the English Revolution Revisited: Essays in Honour of John Morrill. Boydell Press. ISBN 9781843838180. pps.36-39
  5. ^ Some Observations and Annotations upon the Apologetical Narration (1644)
  6. ^ C.V. Wedgewood (1958), The King's War 1641 - 1647, Collins, p. 285 

Further reading[edit]