Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Watkins (supercentenarian): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under People |
Neptune5000 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete as nom''' 3-sentence article completely about unverifiable longevity OR/SYN. Sources are unreliable RejRes (GRG-authored), GRG, and OHB. Nonnotability and citation lack already tagged in article since 11/2007. [[User:John J. Bulten/Friends|JJB]] 05:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete as nom''' 3-sentence article completely about unverifiable longevity OR/SYN. Sources are unreliable RejRes (GRG-authored), GRG, and OHB. Nonnotability and citation lack already tagged in article since 11/2007. [[User:John J. Bulten/Friends|JJB]] 05:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Jclemens-public|Jclemens-public]] ([[User talk:Jclemens-public|talk]]) 07:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Jclemens-public|Jclemens-public]] ([[User talk:Jclemens-public|talk]]) 07:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to establish notability, fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Neptune5000|<span style="color:blue">Neptune</span><span style="color:red">5000</span>]] ([[User talk:Neptune5000#top|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]) 01:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:53, 6 December 2010
Elizabeth Watkins (supercentenarian)
- Elizabeth Watkins (supercentenarian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Continuing nominations of nonnotable supercentenarians with no more than one reliable source per WT:WOP#Common deletion outcomes. I intend that, during discussion, any article supporters either find sources or merge sourced material to deal with the indisputable WP:GNG failure (the requirement of multiple reliable sources); without either of these actions, bare "keep" votes will not address that failure. I also intend that any who disagree with the WT:WOP proposal, which affirms GNG for deletion of these articles, should comment at that link. Article-specific details with my !vote below. JJB 05:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as nom 3-sentence article completely about unverifiable longevity OR/SYN. Sources are unreliable RejRes (GRG-authored), GRG, and OHB. Nonnotability and citation lack already tagged in article since 11/2007. JJB 05:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete No reliable sources to establish notability, fails WP:GNG. Neptune5000 (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC)