1905 Barkston Ash by-election
The Barkston Ash by-election, 1905 was a parliamentary by-election held for the British House of Commons constituency of Barkston Ash, then in the West Riding of Yorkshire, on 13 October 1905.
Vacancy
The by-election was caused by the death, on 18 September 1905, of the sitting Conservative MP Sir Robert Gunter. Gunter had been seriously ill with neuritis and phlebitis since June 1905 and had been unconscious for several days before his death.[1]
Candidates
Conservatives
Because of ill health Gunter had told his local party in 1903 that he would be standing down as MP. They had then selected George Lane-Fox, an Eton and Oxford educated barrister and a member of the West Riding County Council[2] to be their candidate.
Liberals
Barkston Ash was a safe Tory seat. It had never been represented by a Liberal or Radical.[3] Gunter had been unopposed at the 1900 general election and also in 1895 but the political tide seemed to be flowing against the government of Arthur Balfour. In 1903 they had lost five seats in by-elections, in 1904 another seven and six seats had been gained by the Liberals in by-elections so far in 1905.[4] Against this encouraging background the Liberals had already selected Joseph Ormond Andrews a barrister from Leeds to fight the next election[5] and they adopted Andrews as their by-election candidate.[1]
Other
There was speculation that an Independent candidate, Henry Liversidge, who might be best described as a Lib-Lab and who had earlier in 1905 announced an intention to contest the next election,[5] stand as a candidate on the platform of tariff reform.[6] However it was soon reported that no Tariff Reform League or other candidate would be standing on that issue.[7]
Issues
Tariff Reform
Although no tariff candidate entered the field, the issue of protectionism was one of the great issues of the day. Whereas the question of Irish Home Rule had dominated political debate in earlier elections, the ‘dumping’ of foreign goods on British markets and the struggle between tariff reformers and free traders was now seen as a prime election battleground.[3] The Free Trade Union, founded in 1903 to safeguard the free import of food and raw materials and oppose the policy of protection as a barrier to good relations within the British Empire[8] had acquired a reputation for intelligent and effective electioneering on behalf of Liberal candidates and had moved some key organisers into the Barkston Ash constituency to offer support to Andrews[3] and to campaign and produce literature and posters for him.[9] The Liberals played the Free Trade card for all it was worth.[10]
Agricultural labour
There was a strong mining community in the south of the constituency which traditionally supported the Liberals and a substantial suburban house-holder vote spreading out from Leeds, which together with the farmers and landowners could usually be relied upon to vote Conservative. This meant the agricultural labourers held the key to the result.[11] Both candidates courted the votes of the rural worker, Andrews emphasising the value of Free Trade in keeping food prices cheap whereas Lane-Fox appealed to the traditional conservatism of rural people.[11]
Religion
Both candidates also, despite denials[3] were keen to attract votes from the sizeable Roman Catholic minority in the area. The Liberals denounced the Education Act 1902 and hoped for Catholic voters to be sympathetic to Irish Home Rule in support of their co-religionists in Ireland[11] although as the campaign wore on they became vulnerable to attack on the administration of the Education Act by the Liberal controlled West Riding County Council.[12] The Tories looked to the well-established local Catholic community to remain true to their family traditions and support the Conservative establishment.[11]
Foreign affairs
Government policy abroad gave the Liberals little to campaign on. There was a distinct strain of English patriotism in the Yorkshire character and the area had provided strong support over the fighting of the Boer War. The only area left to exploit was the introduction of Chinese labour into South Africa gold mining operations[13] and the allegation that so-called coolies were being forced to work under conditions no better than those of slaves.[14]
Result
The Liberals gained Barkston Ash from the Unionists by a majority of 228 votes.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | Joseph Ormond Andrews | 4,376 | 51.3 | ||
| Conservative | George Richard Lane-Fox | 4,148 | 48.7 | ||
| Majority | 228 | 2.6 | |||
| Turnout | 8,524 | ||||
| Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | ||||
It was another indication of how the electorate across the country, even in such a traditional constituency, had grown tired of the Conservative government which had been in office for ten years. It was this swing of the pendulum, rather than the specific policy issues or personalities of the candidates, which was responsible for the Liberal victory[16] – although the question of tariff reform was clearly an influential element in the result and the campaigning efforts of the Free Trade Union played their part in stimulating the electorate and getting them to the polls in greater numbers than their opponents.[17]
Aftermath
Despite the 1906 Liberal landslide Lane-Fox was returned to parliament three months later and the constituency remained in Tory hands thereafter.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | George Richard Lane-Fox | 4,894 | 53.5 | +4.8 | |
| Liberal | Joseph Ormond Andrews | 4,246 | 46.5 | −4.8 | |
| Majority | 548 | 7.0 | 9.6 | ||
| Turnout | 9,140 | 88.9 | |||
| Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +4.8 | |||
As the Commons were not sitting at the time of the by-election Andrews was one of the few people in history to be elected to parliament but never to take their seat.
References
- ^ a b The Times, 19 September 1905 p4
- ^ The Times, 9 October 1905 p11
- ^ a b c d The Times, 3 October 1905 p7
- ^ Roy Douglas, History of the Liberal Party 1895-1970; Sidgwick & Jackson, 1971 p30
- ^ a b The Times, 12 April 1905 p5
- ^ The Times, 22 September 1905
- ^ The Times, 25 September 1905 p9
- ^ Chris Cook, Sources in British Political History, 1900-1951 Volume 1; Macmillan, 1975 p101
- ^ The Times, 6 October 1905 p5
- ^ The Times 9 October 1905 p11
- ^ a b c d The Times, 4 October 1905 p11
- ^ The Times, 11 October 1905 p8
- ^ The Times, 12 October 1905 p8
- ^ John Hotchkiss Stewart Reid, The origins of the British Labour Party; University of Minnesota Press, 1955 pp107-108
- ^ a b British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 by Craig
- ^ The Times, 16 October 1905 p7
- ^ The Times, 13 October 1905 p8