Category talk:Photography magazines

Photography Category‑class

	This category is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Magazines Category‑class

	This category is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

But is it Art?[edit]

It's widely believed that photography, or anyway good photography, is a kind or method of art. If this is so, then photography magazines might be expected to be a subcategory of Category:Art magazines. However, a quick glance at photography magazines shows -- even after one excludes the ads -- that art, however defined, accounts for a small percentage of the content of most. Thus I suggest that this is not made a subcategory of Category:Art magazines. No harm will be done if a few magazines, such as Aperture, go in both categories. -- Hoary 09:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]