Category talk:Women composers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Category title[edit]

Would Female composers be more accurate? scarecroe 01:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

debate[edit]

An unsourced claim of former debate is irrelevant. Septentrionalis 21:36, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cfd 22 Aug 2005[edit]

No consensus, no change, see discussion for details. However, previous Cfd was to delete, you can see the entire 15 June Cfd discussion here, and following conversations covering gender related categories. Who?¿? 01:33, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; this reference should have been supplied to the deletion discussion. I will comment here that Niteowlneil's argument seems to ignore the fundamental category structure; there shouldn't be any individual bio's in Category:Composers or Category:scientists; all should be subcatted by period, style/science, and (why not?) gender. Septentrionalis 17:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CFD[edit]

hurp durp woman composer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.195.171 (talk) 14:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Women composers / Women classical composers[edit]

What is the distinction between the two categories? Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]