# Cross-polarized wave generation

Fig. 1.

Cross-polarized wave (XPW) generation is a nonlinear optical process that can be classified in the group of frequency degenerate (four-wave mixing) processes. It can take place only in media with anisotropy of third-order nonlinearity. As a result of such nonlinear optical interaction at the output of the nonlinear crystal, it is generated a new linearly polarized wave at the same frequency, but with polarization oriented perpendicularly to the polarization of input wave

${\displaystyle \omega ^{(\perp )}~=~\omega ^{(\|)}~+~\omega ^{(\|)}~-~\omega ^{(\|)}}$.

Simplified optical scheme for XPW generation is shown on Fig. 1. It consists of a nonlinear crystal plate (thick 1-2 mm) sandwiched between two crossed polarizers. The intensity of generated XPW has cubic dependence with respect to the intensity of the input wave. In fact this is the main reason this effect is so successful for improvement of the contrast of the temporal and spatial profiles of femtosecond pulses. Since cubic crystals are used as nonlinear media they are isotropic with respect to linear properties (there is no birefringence) and because of that the phase and group velocities of both waves XPW and the fundamental wave (FW) are equal:VXPW=VFW and Vgr,XPW=Vgr,FW. Consequence of that is ideal phase and group velocity matching for the two waves propagating along the crystal. This property allows obtaining very good efficiency of the XPW generation process with minimum distortions of the pulse shape and the spectrum.

## Description of the process

Consider the case of interaction of two perpendicularly polarized waves in nonlinear media with cubic nonlinearity.[1] The equations describing the self phase modulation of the fundamental wave A and the generation of new wave perpendicularly polarized wave B in condition that |B| << |A| (i.e. when the depletion of the fundamental wave is neglected, self and cross phase modulation of wave B) can be written in following form:

Fig. 2. Dependence of the efficiency of XPW generation for three different time and spatial profiles: rectangular (top hat) in space and Gaussian in time (gray solid line); Gaussian in time and space (dash line); rectangular in time and space, i. e. plane wave (black solid line).
${\displaystyle {\frac {dA}{dz}}=-i\gamma _{\|}|A|^{2}A}$,
${\displaystyle {\frac {dB}{dz}}=-i\gamma _{\perp }|A|^{2}A}$,

where ${\displaystyle \gamma _{\|}}$ and ${\displaystyle \gamma _{\perp }}$ are coefficients that depend on (i) the orientation of the sample with respect to the crystal axes (see [2] for the expressions for two popular orientations: Z-cut and for holographic cut); (ii) the component ${\displaystyle \chi _{xxxx}^{(3)}}$ and (iii) anisotropy of ${\displaystyle \chi _{}^{(3)}}$ tensor.[2]

The solution of this simplified system with initial conditions А(0)=А0 and B (0) = 0 is:

${\displaystyle A=A_{0}e^{-i\gamma _{||}|A|^{2}L}}$,
${\displaystyle B=A_{0}{\frac {\gamma _{\perp }}{\gamma _{||}}}(e^{-i\gamma _{||}|A|^{2}L}-1)}$,

where L is the length of the nonlinear media. In case of CW pump, the efficiency ${\displaystyle \eta }$, that is defined as ratio of XPW intensity Iout at the output of the nonlinear media to the intensity of the input wave Iin can be described by sin2 function of input intensity × length product:

(1)         ${\displaystyle \eta ={\frac {|B(L)|^{2}}{|A_{0}|^{2}}}={\frac {I_{out}}{I_{in}}}=4({\frac {\gamma _{\perp }}{\gamma _{||}}})^{2}\sin ^{2}(\gamma _{||}|A|^{2}L/2)}$.

If self phase modulation is relatively small ${\displaystyle \gamma _{\|}|A|^{2}L\leq 1}$ then:

(2)         ${\displaystyle \eta =({\gamma _{\perp }})^{2}|A|^{4}L^{2}\propto \gamma _{\perp }^{2}I_{in}^{2}L^{2}}$.

Fig. 3. Experimentally measured XPW generation efficiency as a function of input energy (in μJ) with use of BaF2 crystal(s) for one crystal scheme (upper plot) and two crystal scheme (lower plot).

The last expression (2) indicates that when nonlinear phase shift of the fundamental wave ${\displaystyle \gamma _{\|}|A|^{2}L}$ is relatively small the efficiency grows as square of input intensity. The increase of the nonlinear phase shift above 3 prevents the coherent growing of XPW signal and leads in principle to periodical dependence of the efficiency as a function of input intensity. The use of two crystal scheme allows this problem to be overcome.[3][4][2]

Accounting the temporal and spatial shapes leads to reduction of the predicted by expression (1) efficiency. This is illustrated on Fig. 2 where the exact solution with all processes accompanying the effect of generation of XPW taken into account is given. The maximum XPW efficiency obtained with single crystal scheme approaches 12% for Gaussian in space and in time, while for top-hat spatial profile and Gaussian in time the maximum achieved efficiency is 29%. This behavior is direct consequence of the nonlinearity of the process. Typical experimental results for generation of XPW in BaF2 crystal are shown in Fig. 3. It is seen the efficiency of XPW process in single crystal scheme saturates close to 10%, while with two crystal scheme one can achieve 20–30% efficiency for XPW generation.[3][2]

The effect of XPW generation is finding application for enhancement of the temporal contrast of femtosecond pulses [4] and for their monitoring and control. The approach of XPW generation for cleaning femtosecond pulses will be used in the Extreme Light Infrastructure European project.[5][6]

## References

1. ^ Minkovski, N.; Saltiel, S. M.; Petrov, G. I.; Albert, O.; Etchepare, J. (2002-11-15). "Polarization rotation induced by cascaded third-order processes". Optics Letters. The Optical Society. 27 (22): 2025–2027. doi:10.1364/ol.27.002025. ISSN 0146-9592. Minkovski, N.; Petrov, G. I.; Saltiel, S. M.; Albert, O.; Etchepare, J. (2004-09-01). "Nonlinear polarization rotation and orthogonal polarization generation experienced in a single-beam configuration". Journal of the Optical Society of America B. The Optical Society. 21 (9): 1659–1664. doi:10.1364/josab.21.001659. ISSN 0740-3224.
2. ^ a b c d Canova, Lorenzo; Kourtev, Stoyan; Minkovski, Nikolay; Jullien, Aurélie; Lopez-Martens, Rodrigo; Albert, Olivier; Saltiel, Solomon M. (2008-06-09). "Efficient generation of cross-polarized femtosecond pulses in cubic crystals with holographic cut orientation". Applied Physics Letters. AIP Publishing. 92 (23): 231102. doi:10.1063/1.2939584. ISSN 0003-6951.
3. ^ a b Jullien, A.; Albert, O.; Chériaux, G.; Etchepare, J.; Kourtev, S.; Minkovski, N.; Saltiel, S. M. (2006). "A two crystal arrangement to fight efficiency saturation in cross-polarized wave generation". Optics Express. The Optical Society. 14 (7): 2760–2769. doi:10.1364/oe.14.002760. ISSN 1094-4087.
4. ^ Jullien, A.; Kourtev, S.; Albert, O.; Chériaux, G.; Etchepare, J.; Minkovski, N.; Saltiel, S.M. (2006-06-29). "Highly efficient temporal cleaner for femtosecond pulses based on cross-polarized wave generation in a dual crystal scheme". Applied Physics B. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 84 (3): 409–414. doi:10.1007/s00340-006-2334-7. ISSN 0946-2171.
5. ^ Jullien, Aurélie; Albert, Olivier; Burgy, Frédéric; Hamoniaux, Guy; Rousseau, Jean-Philippe; Chambaret, Jean-Paul; Augé-Rochereau, Frédérika; Chériaux, Gilles; Etchepare, Jean; Minkovski, Nikolay; Saltiel, Solomon M. (2005-04-15). "10^?10 temporal contrast for femtosecond ultraintense lasers by cross-polarized wave generation". Optics Letters. The Optical Society. 30 (8): 920–922. doi:10.1364/ol.30.000920. ISSN 0146-9592.
6. ^ Chvykov, V.; Rousseau, P.; Reed, S.; Kalinchenko, G.; Yanovsky, V. (2006-05-15). "Generation of 10^11 contrast 50 TW laser pulses". Optics Letters. The Optical Society. 31 (10): 1456–1458. doi:10.1364/ol.31.001456. ISSN 0146-9592.