Jump to content

Davila v. Davis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Davila v. Davis
Decided June 26, 2017
Full case nameDavila v. Davis
Docket no.16-6219
Citations582 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
The ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel does not provide cause to excuse the procedural default of ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claims.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinions
MajorityThomas
DissentBreyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan

Davila v. Davis, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel does not provide cause to excuse the procedural default of ineffective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel claims.[1][2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Davila v. Davis, No. 16-6219, 582 U.S. ___ (2017).
  2. ^ "Opinion analysis: In Texas capital case, divided court limits scope of "nested" ineffective-assistance claims". SCOTUSblog. 2017-06-27. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
[edit]
  • Text of Davila v. Davis, No. 16-6219, 582 U.S. ___ (2017) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)