Detransition: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 22:0722:07, 3 March 2019 Mooeena talk contribs 30,850 bytes +8 Hopefully this is a good compromise.
curprev 20:0020:00, 3 March 2019 A145GI15I95 talk contribs m 30,842 bytes +5 →Individual accounts: Unclear why "lived as transgender" was changed to "lived as female".
curprev 02:0102:01, 3 March 2019 Equivamp talk contribs 30,837 bytes −8 →Individual accounts: A few changes to wording
curprev 00:4300:43, 3 March 2019 Equivamp talk contribs 30,845 bytes −294 →Occurrence: Connection to the topic of detransition is paramount here

curprev 20:5420:54, 2 March 2019 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 31,139 bytes +16 Dating maintenance tags: {{Npov}}
curprev 20:3320:33, 2 March 2019 Mooeena talk contribs 31,123 bytes +11 Added NPOG tag. See talk page. Tag: Visual edit
curprev 16:3516:35, 2 March 2019 A145GI15I95 talk contribs m 31,112 bytes −35 Undid revision 885735464 by Raksasi (talk) Citations are given in article MOS:CITELEAD. Tag: Undo
curprev 00:0700:07, 2 March 2019 Raksasi talk contribs m 31,147 bytes +35 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit

curprev 18:0618:06, 18 February 2019 A145GI15I95 talk contribs 31,112 bytes +218 Renewed attempt to summarize all sections into one brief paragraph for lead.
curprev 07:4507:45, 18 February 2019 Citation bot talk contribs m 30,894 bytes −79 Alter: template type, title. Add: chapter-url, pages, issue, volume, journal, doi. Removed accessdate with no specified URL. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | User-activated.

curprev 22:3122:31, 15 February 2019 StardustCat talk contribs 24,215 bytes −4,504 Cantor's findings are self-published on his personal blog with some very vague interpretation of the numbers. This is definitely not an acceptable source and should not stand alongside actual research studies. See WP:Self-published.