This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
A congruence θ of a join-semilattice S is monomial, if the θ-equivalence class of any element of S has a largest element. We say that θ is distributive, if it is a join, in the congruence lattice Con S of S, of monomial join-congruences of S.
The following definition originates in Schmidt's 1968 work and was subsequently adjusted by Wehrung.
Definition (weakly distributive homomorphisms). A homomorphism μ : S → T between join-semilattices S and T is weakly distributive, if for all a, b in S and all c in T such that μ(c)≤ a ∨ b, there are elements x and y of S such that c≤ x ∨ y, μ(x)≤ a, and μ(y)≤ b.
(1) For an algebra B and a reduct A of B (that is, an algebra with same underlying set as B but whose set of operations is a subset of the one of B), the canonical (∨, 0)-homomorphism from Conc A to Conc B is weakly distributive. Here, Conc A denotes the (∨, 0)-semilattice of all compact congruences of A.
(2) For a convex sublattice K of a lattice L, the canonical (∨, 0)-homomorphism from Conc K to Conc L is weakly distributive.
E.T. Schmidt, Zur Charakterisierung der Kongruenzverbände der Verbände, Mat. Casopis Sloven. Akad. Vied. 18 (1968), 3--20.
F. Wehrung, A uniform refinement property for congruence lattices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 127, no. 2 (1999), 363–370.
F. Wehrung, A solution to Dilworth's congruence lattice problem, preprint 2006.