Draft:Chati
Submission declined on 26 January 2024 by Asilvering (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Chati is a virtual event platform based in Yorba Linda, California.[citation needed]
History
[edit]Chati was founded in March 2021 by Greg and Don Cruikshank.[1] When founded, Chati was composed of 25 team members across five departments: sales, marketing & public relations, production, creative, and development.
In 2023, Labroots, Inc. had 145 customers, including Thermo Fisher Scientific, Abbott, BD, Agilent Technologies, Siemens, Sartorius, and others; several of which are now using Chati as Labroots' default platform.[2]
Platform and Services
[edit]Chati's current products include virtual and hybrid event solutions such as webinars, sales, marketing, virtual training, education, internal events/meetings, HR recruitment/job fairs, conferences, and virtual team building. Chati offers two service models, full-service and self-service. With full-service, Chati's experienced production team and in-house design team builds an event to client specifications, while self-service allows event organizers to design and deploy virtual events tailored to their audience with the help of Chati-produce templates.
References
[edit]- ^ "MarTech Edge Interview with Greg Cruikshank, Chief Executive Officer, Chati". MarTech Edge. Retrieved 2024-01-24.
- ^ "Explore Labroots Partnering Companies and Sponsors". www.labroots.com. Retrieved 2024-01-24.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.