Draft:Constructive Disalignment
Submission declined on 8 November 2024 by Bonadea (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 7 November 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Qcne 19 days ago. | |
Comment: It seems very unlikely that this is in fact a notable concept as yet, and this is illustrated by the fact that four out of the five sources are about constructive alignment rather than constructive disalignment (this includes source 4, which purportedly verifies the definition of the term constructive disalignment but doesn't mention it anywhere.There might be a mention of it in the article Constructive alignment, provided there is a source other than source 5 in this draft (the only one that is about constructive disalignment), which is not independent. bonadea contributions talk 18:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: We usually require at least three independent sources. qcne (talk) 16:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Constructive disalignment, developed in response to Biggs' constructive alignment [1][2][3]occurs when all elements of a university programme’s teaching, learning, and assessment processes and learning outcomes/competences are not clearly and fully aligned with the fundamental purpose of the course.[4] Essentially, constructive disalignment is where there is a mismatch, or a number of mismatches, between what the programme aims to do (its espoused aims), how it achieves those aims through teaching, learning and assessment processes, and what the students and other key stakeholders, such as employers, expect, want and need it to do. Wherever there is constructive disalignment there will necessarily be problems, issues and unresolved tensions leading to stakeholder dissatisfaction.
The term was developed by Dr Andrew G Holmes and Dr Dominic Henri at the University of Hull in 2024.
References
[edit]- ^ Biggs, John (1996-10-01). "Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment". Higher Education. 32 (3): 347–364. doi:10.1007/BF00138871. ISSN 1573-174X.
- ^ "Constructive Alignment | John Biggs". www.johnbiggs.com.au. Retrieved 2024-11-08.
- ^ "Constructive Alignment | Library Glion". Retrieved 2024-11-08.
- ^ "A Competence-Based Assessment Framework". www.qaa.ac.uk. Retrieved 2024-11-08.
- ^ Holmes and Henri, Andrew, G. and Henri, D. (7/10/24). "https://www.qaa.ac.uk/membership/collaborative-enhancement-projects". Quality Assurance Agency. Retrieved 7/11/24.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|access-date=and|date=(help); External link in|title=
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.