Draft:Jaw bone atrophy

Jaw Bone Atrophy Jaw bone atrophy is a condition characterized by the progressive loss of bone density and volume in the jaw, often resulting from aging, tooth loss, disease, or failure of previous dental implants. This condition can significantly impact a person's quality of life, leading to difficulties in speaking, chewing, and maintaining facial structure, ultimately contributing to social exclusion and reduced self-esteem. Causes Jaw bone atrophy can be attributed to several factors, including: Aging: As people age, the natural resorption of bone can lead to significant bone loss in the jaw. Tooth Loss: The loss of teeth, particularly when left untreated, accelerates bone resorption due to the lack of stimulation that normally occurs from chewing. Medical Conditions: Conditions such as osteoporosis or severe periodontal disease can contribute to bone loss. Implant Failure: Failed dental implants or the inability to place implants due to insufficient bone density can exacerbate the problem. Impact on Quality of Life The consequences of jaw bone atrophy extend beyond functional limitations. Individuals with severe bone loss often experience difficulties with basic activities such as speaking and chewing, which can lead to nutritional deficiencies and social withdrawal. The inability to secure traditional dental implants due to insufficient bone height and width further complicates treatment options, leaving many patients feeling hopeless. Traditional and Emerging Treatment Options Historically, the treatment of jaw bone atrophy has involved bone grafting procedures to rebuild the jaw structure, followed by the placement of dental implants. Techniques such as the All-on-Four implant system, which allows for a full arch of teeth to be supported by just four implants, have provided solutions for many patients. However, even with these advancements, some individuals cannot receive traditional implants due to the extent of bone loss. Cortical Bone Implant Techniques For cases where traditional implants are not feasible, newer techniques involve anchoring implants in the denser cortical bone regions of the face, such as the zygomatic buttress. Companies like Nobel Biocare and Straumann have developed specialized implants that are anchored in these regions, offering viable solutions for patients with severe maxillary atrophy. These implants provide a stable foundation for prosthetic teeth, allowing for improved function and aesthetics. Advancements in 3D Printing and Custom Implants The advent of 3D printing technology has revolutionized the field of dental implants, particularly for patients with severe jaw bone atrophy. Custom-designed subperiosteal implants, which sit on top of the bone rather than within it, are now possible thanks to advancements in 3D printing. According to Fortune Business Insider, leading companies in this market include Avinent, KLS Martin, and BoneEasy. These custom implants are designed to fit the patient's unique anatomy, providing a solution for those who were previously considered untreatable. These innovations have expanded the range of options available to patients, offering hope to those who have been excluded from traditional implant treatments. Importantly, these custom implants can be used in both the upper and lower jaws, making them a versatile option for a broader range of patients. Conclusion The evolution of dental implant technology continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in the treatment of jaw bone atrophy. As science and technology advance, more patients can benefit from these life-changing treatments, regaining their ability to speak, chew, and engage with society. The development of techniques and technologies such as cortical bone implants and 3D-printed subperiosteal implants represents a significant leap forward in improving the quality of life for individuals suffering from severe bone atrophy. Misch, C.E., et al. "Implant Design Considerations for the Posterior Regions of the Mouth." Journal of Oral Implantology 24, no. 2 (1998): 106-115. Meyer, U., et al. "Bone Loading Characteristics of Dental Implants with and Without Apical Fixation: A Biomechanical Study." Clinical Oral Implants Research 12, no. 6 (2001): 637-643. Truninger, T., et al. "Fatigue and Fracture of Dental Implants: A Review." Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 9 (2012): 91-105. Bedrossian, E. Implant Treatment Planning for the Edentulous Patient: A Graftless Approach to Immediate Loading. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2010. Aparicio, C., et al. "A Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of 110 Zygomatic Implants: A 1–9-year Study." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 11, no. 2 (2006): 187-194. Graves, S.L. "Pterygoid Implants for Maxillary Rehabilitation: A Review of the Literature." Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 94, no. 4 (2005): 324-330. Boyes-Varley, J.G., et al. "Maxillary Palatal Implants: A Critical Review of the Literature." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12, no. 2 (1997): 217-222. Maló, P., et al. "Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Atrophic Maxillae by Immediate Function Using Quadruple Zygomatic Implants in Conjunction with Anterior Implants: A Two-Year Retrospective Study." Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 7, no. 1 (2005): 4-14. Aparicio, C., et al. "Zygomatic Implants: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 27, no. 4 (2012): 1006-1020. Stella, J.P., and Warner, M.R. "Sinus Slot Technique for Simplified, Predictable, Immediate Placement of Zygomatic Implants: A Technical Note." The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 15, no. 6 (2000): 889-893. Brånemark, P.I., et al. "Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Patient with Branemark System Implants." Periodontology 2000 17, no. 1 (1998): 104-116. Santos, L.M.M., Figueiredo, J.L.T., Coelho, R. "Comparison of Zygomatic Implants and Implantize Compact from Boneeasy: A Finite Element Analysis for Bending and Safety Factor." Journal of Oral Medicine and Dental Research (2024). Subperiosteal Dental Implants Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Material (Titanium, Zirconium, and Others), By End-user (Solo Practices, DSO/Group Practices, and Others), and Regional Forecast, 2024-2032 Last Updated: July 29, 2024 | Format: PDF | Report ID: FBI100807 https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/zygomatic-and-pterygoid-implants-market https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/subperiosteal-dental-implants-market-100807