Entrustable professional activity
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2023) |
Entrustable professional activity (EPA) refers to a framework within medical education where trainees are evaluated on their ability to perform certain critical clinical tasks without direct supervision. Originating from the medical education domain, the success of EPAs has sparked interest in its application across other professional sectors.
History and development
[edit]The last decades of the 20th century saw a pronounced shift in medical education, with a growing emphasis on competency-based medical education (CBME). Especially in English-speaking countries like the USA, UK, Canada, and Australia, there was an increasing call to ensure that medical graduates had specific competencies to guarantee patient safety and effective medical care. This led to institutions framing their curricula around competency frameworks, such as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in the USA, which defined core competencies for all medical specialties.[1]
However, while CBME provided a structured approach, educators and policymakers noticed some limitations. Competencies, though crucial, were often too granular or abstract for direct assessment. This raised concerns about how to determine a trainee's readiness for independent practice. Was it enough to be competent in isolated skills, or was there a need to demonstrate capability in integrating these skills in real-world contexts?
Professor Olle Ten Cate from the Netherlands introduced the concept of EPAs in this backdrop. The idea was to bridge the gap between competency acquisition and real-world clinical responsibilities. Instead of asking if a trainee had acquired a list of skills, the focus shifted to whether they could be "entrusted" with specific professional activities that integrated multiple competencies.[2]
This framework quickly gained traction, not just in the Netherlands, but also in various English-speaking countries. In the United States, for instance, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) explored the implementation of EPAs for undergraduate medical education. By 2014, the AAMC had defined a set of 13 core EPAs that all medical school graduates should be able to perform on day one of residency without direct supervision.[3]
The UK, Canada, and Australia also saw discussions and pilot implementations of the EPA framework, recognizing the need for a more holistic approach to assessing trainee readiness for clinical practice.[4][5]
Success in medical education
[edit]The transition to EPAs from the traditional competency-based approach bore several advantages:
- Authentic Assessment: EPAs fostered a more authentic and real-world assessment of a medical trainee's capabilities, ensuring readiness for independent clinical practice.[6]
- Integrated Competencies: Unlike the compartmentalized assessment in traditional models, EPAs offered a unified approach, viewing competencies as interconnected and providing a comprehensive overview of a trainee's skillset.[7]
- Tailored Feedback: The specificity of EPAs permitted educators to deliver more precise feedback, driving trainees towards areas that needed improvement [8]
Related articles
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Swing, Susan R. (January 2007). "The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective". Medical Teacher. 29 (7): 648–654. doi:10.1080/01421590701392903. ISSN 0142-159X. PMID 18236251. S2CID 205475450.
- ^ ten Cate, Olle (2013-03-01). "Nuts and Bolts of Entrustable Professional Activities". Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 5 (1): 157–158. doi:10.4300/jgme-d-12-00380.1. ISSN 1949-8357. PMC 3613304. PMID 24404246.
- ^ Obeso, Vivian T.; Phillipi, Carrie A.; Degnon, Christine A.; Carter, Teresa J. (2018-02-05). "A Systems-Based Approach to Curriculum Development and Assessment of Core Entrustable Professional Activities in Undergraduate Medical Education". Medical Science Educator. 28 (2): 407–416. doi:10.1007/s40670-018-0540-7. ISSN 2156-8650. S2CID 256428777.
- ^ Frank, Jason R.; Danoff, Deborah (January 2007). "The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies". Medical Teacher. 29 (7): 642–647. doi:10.1080/01421590701746983. ISSN 0142-159X. PMID 18236250. S2CID 2396441.
- ^ Batalden, Paul; Leach, David; Swing, Susan; Dreyfus, Hubert; Dreyfus, Stuart (September 2002). "General Competencies And Accreditation In Graduate Medical Education". Health Affairs. 21 (5): 103–111. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.21.5.103. ISSN 0278-2715. PMID 12224871.
- ^ Holmboe, Eric S.; Sherbino, Jonathan; Long, Donlin M.; Swing, Susan R.; Frank, Jason R. (2010-07-27). "The role of assessment in competency-based medical education". Medical Teacher. 32 (8): 676–682. doi:10.3109/0142159x.2010.500704. ISSN 0142-159X. PMID 20662580. S2CID 19056325.
- ^ Mulder, Hanneke; Cate, Olle Ten; Daalder, Rieneke; Berkvens, Josephine (2010-09-20). "Building a competency-based workplace curriculum around entrustable professional activities: The case of physician assistant training". Medical Teacher. 32 (10): e453–e459. doi:10.3109/0142159x.2010.513719. ISSN 0142-159X. PMID 20854153. S2CID 25845498.
- ^ van der Vleuten, C. P. M.; Schuwirth, L. W. T.; Driessen, E. W.; Dijkstra, J.; Tigelaar, D.; Baartman, L. K. J.; van Tartwijk, J. (2012-02-25). "A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose". Medical Teacher. 34 (3): 205–214. doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.652239. ISSN 0142-159X. PMID 22364452. S2CID 6820916.