File talk:Cool Timeline2.png

I'm sad that all the different types of cool were replaced by just techno and hip-hop. If those are the only types of cool left, I am very uncool. --121.72.41.251 09:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... according to the chart, hip-hop has covered all other forms of cool like a blanket. How is this remotely accurate? Fishal 20:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Graphing 'cool' is undoubtly uncool. --Endlessdan 18:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is fully yankeecentric and doesn't retreat the point of view outside the United States.--85.53.15.23 01:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USA ALL THE WAY! --EndlessDan 17:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what the vertical axis on this chart is supposed to represent. SamSim (talk) 23:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This chart is totally meaningless. It should be deleted. -Branddobbe (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently nothing cool has happened in Africa since about the 1600's... I vote to delete this chart. Thalter (talk) 19:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah i dont see how plantations were ever "cool"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.51.221 (talk) 06:02, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can't se how they'd be cool now. They were undoubtedly widely spread, especially among the "aristocracy"/people of whom most record was kept most loudly of the time, and thus as close as 1600s can get to "cool" Tar7arus (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image is almost entirely meaningless, and where it does have meaning it is misleading. Case in point: 'British aristocratic reserve'. No such movement existed, in the sense that the Lodz Film School existed. The period this putative movement covers includes the Metaphysical Poets, the cartoons of Gillray, William Blake, Oscar Wilde, John Ruskin... All tremendously influential, British, and not in the least bit reserved. Who, may I ask, belongs in the box "British Aristocratic Reserve"? Without a good number of notable British people who are influential becuase of their reserve and who cover the entire period, I suggest deletion.87.236.134.38 ([[User talk:87.236.134.38|talk]

Besides being pretty debatable, this chart doesn't even mention the Asias. Nnnudibranch 21:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

What's come out of the Asias that's cool? Ummm... nothing. So fuck off. --58.108.74.7 (talk) 11:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's entirely untrue. Lololol. Useless, misleading picture is misleading. Surely "Rap" and "Hip hop" aren't the only things that are considered "cool" in mainstream society? 80.2.12.91 (talk) Anonymous 14:01 GMT, 30th July 2008

For Deletion?[edit]

The debate for deletion is now archived, can the "for deletion" now tag be removed? Tar7arus (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed it already. Thanks. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 14:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone hurry up and delete this shit? It pains me to look at it. --90.213.164.169 (talk) 17:22, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would have added Bob Dylan in addition to Elvis as well; in the early to mid 60s he defined cool, more than the Beatles at the time, who looked up to him until later when they grew out of their early phase. James Dean may be worthy of consideration for the preceding decade too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Word dewd544 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis is there, but swing isn't?[edit]

I think that it is significant enough to be mentioned. 71.236.23.111 (talk) 02:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]